Log in

Landscapes with the Greatest Natural Heritage in Chiapas, Mexico

  • GEOGRAPHY ABROAD
  • Published:
Geography and Natural Resources Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research has identified the landscapes in the state of Chiapas (Mexico) with the best natural conditions by using the theoretical-methodological principles of complex physical geography. To achieve this goal, the biodiversity was assessed by calculating the number of vascular plant species for each landscape unit and correlated with the results of previous research regarding landscape diversity and the anthropization of vegetation cover. The results indicate that the highest levels of biodiversity correspond to the predominant and recurring landscapes. These geographical relationships indicate the influence of the geomorphological component on the distribution of biodiversity, which was quantitatively validated via two statistical correlations. It is found that the complexes of summits, hillslopes, and gullies in mountain landscapes of tectonic-karstic, tectonic-accumulative, and tectonic-intrusive origin, in temperate, semiwarm humid to subhumid, warm humid, and warm subhumid climates located in the physicogeographical regions of the Lacandona Mountains, the Southern Mountains of Chiapas, and the Western Mountains of Chiapas, all have the best preserved geographical landscapes. In recent years, however, geocomplexes have been impacted by society, which is particularly evident in the Northern Mountains of the Chiapas region. The results of this research are an important contribution to land-use planning processes, because they make it possible to objectively establish environmental policies in Chiapas. For instance, this research provides the geographic basis for modifying or promoting new natural protected areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

REFERENCES

  1. Reid, W.V., Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis, Washington, D.C.: Island Press, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Operational Guidelines for the World Heritage Convention in 2019. http://whc.unesco.org/en/guidelines. Cited April 19, 2021.

  3. Vanteeva, J. and Solodyankina, V., Ecosystem functions of steppe landscapes near Lake Baikal, Hacquetia, 2015, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 65–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sanchéz, M.T., Bocco, G., and Casado, J.M., La política de ordenamiento territorial en México: de la teoría a la práctica. Reflexiones sobre sus avances y retos a futuro, in La política de ordenamiento territorial en México: de la teoría a la práctica, Mexico City: Institute of Geography, UNAM-SEMARNAT, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sochava, V.B., Vvedenie v uchenie o geosistemakh (Introduction to the Doctrine of Geosystems), Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1978.

  6. Solntsev, N.A., Main problems of Soviet landscape science, Sovet. Geogr., 1962, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Priego-Santander, A.G., Campos, M., Bocco, G., and Ramírez, L.G., Relationship between landscape heterogeneity and plant species richness on the Mexican Pacific Coast, Appl. Geogr., 2013, vol. 40, pp. 171–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ganzei, K.S. and Ivanov, A., Landscape diversity of the Kuril Islands, Geogr. Nat. Resour., 2012, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 87–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ganzei, K.S., Pshenichnikova, N.F., and Kiselyova, A.G., Stability assessment of insular geosystems of the Empress Eugénie Archipelago (Peter the Great Gulf, Sea of Japan), Geogr. Nat. Resour., 2020, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 151–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dronin, N.M. and Francis, J.M., Landscape concept in history of Russian (Soviet) geography, in Current Trends in Landscape Research, Innovations in Landscape Research, Muncheberg: Leibniz Centre for Agric. Landscape Res., 2019, pp. 41–62.

  11. Mateo Rodríguez, J.M., Geografía de los Paisajes, Ciudad de La Habana: Universidad de la Habana, 2002.

  12. Bollo-Manent, M. and Hernández Santana, J.R Physical geographycal landscapes of the North western of Chiapas State, Mexico Investigaciones Geográficas, Boletín del Instituto de Geografía, UNAM, 2008, no. 66, pp. 7–24.

  13. Salinas-Chávez, E., Mateo Rodríguez, J.M., Costa de Souza, L., and Moreira, A., Landscape cartography: Theory and application, Physis Terrae, 2019, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 7–29.

    Google Scholar 

  14. González, M., Ramírez, N., Méndez, G., Galindo, L., and Golicher, D., Riqueza de especies de árboles: variación espacial y dimensiones ambientales asociadas a nivel regional, in Diversidad Biológica en Chiapas, México City: Plaza y Valdés Editores, 2005, pp. 81–125.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Morales-Iglesias, H. and Priego-Santander, A.G., Landscape diversity in the Chiapas State, Mexico, Cuadernos Geograficos, 2020, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 316–336.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO), in La biodiversidad en Chiapas: Estudio de Estado, Mexico City: Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad and Gobierno del Estado de Chiapas, 2013. https:// www.cbd.int/doc/nbsap/study/mx-study-chiapas-p1-es. pdf. Cited April 19, 2021.

  17. Morales-Iglesias, H., Priego-Santander, A.G., Bollo-Manent, M., and José-Ríos, M., The anthropization of the vegetation cover in the landscapes of Chiapas State, Mexico, Geogr. Pap., 2019, no. 65, pp. 139–154.

  18. Morales-Iglesias, H., Priego-Santander, A., and Bollo-Manent, M., The map of the physical-geographical landscapes of the Chiapas State, 1: 250 000 scale, Terra Digitalis Int. E-J. of Map, 2017, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–7.

  19. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO), in Sistema Nacional de Información Biológica, Mexico City: Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI), ArcGIS 9.0. https://www.esri.com/en-us/home. Cited April 19, 2021.

  21. StatSoft, Inc. 2007, STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 8.0. www.statsoft.com. Cited April 19, 2021.

  22. Martínez-Camilo, R., González-Espinosa, M., Ramírez-Marcial, N., Cayuela, L., and Pérez-Farrera, M.A., Tropical tree species diversity in a mountain system in southern Mexico: Local and regional patterns and determinant factors, Biotropica, 2018, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 499–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jiménez-López, D.A., Martínez-Camilo, R., Martínez-Meléndez, N., and Kessler, M., Diversity of epiphyte ferns along an elevational gradient in el Triunfo Biosphere Reserve, southern Mexico, Plant Ecol. Evol., 2020, vol. 153, no. 1, pp. 12–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Martínez-Camilo, R. and Martinez-Melendez, N., Características físico-ambientales de los bosques mesófilos en Chiapas, in Los Bosques Mesófilos de Montaña en Chiapas. Situación Actual, Diversidad y Conservación, Tuxtla Gutiérrez: Univ. de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas, 2010, pp. 161–181.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Priego-Santander, A.G., Morales-Iglesias, H., and Enríquez-Guadarrama, C., Paisajes físico-geográficos de la cuenca Lerma-Chapala, Gaceta Ecológica, 2004, no. 71, pp. 11–12.

  26. Macías-Vázquez, J.L., Sánchez-Núñez, J.M., Ramón-Avellán, D., and Arce-Saldaña, J.L., Vulcanismo, in Atlas de Factores de Riesgos de la Cuenca de Motozintla, Chiapas, Mexico City: Institute of Geophysic and Institute de Geography UNAM, Centro de Investigación en Gestión de Riesgos y Cambio Climático, UNICACH, 2013, pp. 92–95.

  27. Ramírez-Sánchez, L.G., Priego-Santander, A.G., Bollo-Manent, M., and Castelo- Agüero, D.C., Potencial para la conservación de la geodiversidad de los paisajes del Estado de Michoacán, México, Perspectiva Geográfica, 2016, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 321–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rodríguez-Echeverry, J. and Leiton, M., Loss and fragmentation of native forest acosystems and its influence on habitat diversity in the Tropical Andes hotspot, Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, 2021, vol. 92, pp. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Toledo, V.M., Repensar la conservación: ¿áreas naturales protegidas o estrategia bioregional?, Gaceta Ecológica, 2005, no. 77, pp. 67–83.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to H. Morales-Iglesias, A. G. Priego-Santander, E. Díaz-Nigenda or M. A. Alatorre-Ibargüengoitia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morales-Iglesias, H., Priego-Santander, A.G., Díaz-Nigenda, E. et al. Landscapes with the Greatest Natural Heritage in Chiapas, Mexico. Geogr. Nat. Resour. 43, 394–400 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1875372822040096

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1875372822040096

Keywords:

Navigation