Abstract
Chronic sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) is characterized by an increase in hearing thresholds at basic speech frequencies, which implies deterioration of auditory speech feedback control and, as a result, changes of speech characteristics. A hypothesis was tested that such deterioration can manifest itself in an increase of F0, F1, F2 formants of speech vowel in patients with moderate and moderately severe postlingual SNHL. Recordings of elicited speech were performed for young and middle age women (36–59 years): 7 women speakers with moderate SNHL who did not use hearing aids; 5 women speakers with moderately severe SNHL who were hearing aids users but were not using them during the recordings; a control group of 12 normally hearing women speakers. An assessment of F0, F1 and F2 of stressed vowels [a], [i], [u] and calculations of vowels’ centralization indices—vowel space area, vowel formant centralization ratio and the second formant ratio (F2i/F2u), were performed. All the studied spectral indices in groups of patients with postlingual SNHL were similar to those in the control group, no statistically reliable differences were revealed.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1134%2FS0022093023020254/MediaObjects/10893_2023_8424_Fig1_HTML.gif)
REFERENCES
Selleck MA, Sataloff RT (2014) The impact of the auditory system on phonation: a review. J Voice 28: 688–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.03.018
Perkell JS (2012) Movement goals and feedback and feedforward control mechanisms in speech production. J Neurolinguistics 25: 382–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2010.02.011
Bolfan-Stosic N, Simunjak B (2007) Effects of hearing loss on the voice in children. J Otolaryngol 36: 120–123. https://doi.org/10.2310/7070.2007.0009
Dehqan A, Scherer RC (2011) Objective voice analysis of boys with profound hearing loss. J Voice 25: 61–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2010.08.006
Schenk BS, Baumgatner WD, Hamzavi J-S (2003) Effect of the loss of auditory feedback on segmental parameters of vowels of postlingually deafened speakers. Auris Nasus Larynx 30: 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0385-8146(03)00093-2
Subtelny JD, Whitehead RL, Samar VJ (1992) Spectral study of deviant resonance in the speech of woman who are deaf. J Speech Lang Hear Res 35: 574–579. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3503.574
Naderifar E, Ghorbani A, Moradi N, Ansari H (2019) Use of formant centralization ratio for vowel impairment detection in normal hearing and different degrees of hearing impairment Logoped Phoniatr Vocol 44: 159–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/14015439.2018.1545867
Hilger AI, Kim SJ, Lester-Smith R, Larson CR (2019) Auditory feedback control of vocal intensity during speech and sustained-vowel production. J Acoust Soc Am 146: 3052 https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5137580
Weerathunge HR, Voon T, Tardif M, Cilento D, Stepp CE (2022) Auditory and somatosensory feedback mechanisms of laryngeal and articulatory speech motor control. Exp Brain Res 240: 2155–2173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-022-06395-7
Luan Y, Wang C, Jiao Y, Tang T, Zhang J, Teng G-J (2019) Dysconnectivity of multiple resting-state networks associated with higher-order functions in sensorineural hearing loss. Front Neurosci 13: 55. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00055
Husain FT, Carpenter-Thompson JR, Schmidt SA (2014) The effect of mild-to-moderate hearing loss on auditory and emotion processing networks. Front Neurosci 8: 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00010
Coelho AC, Medved DM, Brasolotto AG (2015) Hearing loss and the voice. Update On Hearing Loss: 103–128. https://doi.org/10.5772/61217
Garnier M, Henrich N (2014) Speaking in noise: How does the Lombard effect improve acoustic contrasts between speech and ambient noise? Comput Speech and Language 28: 580–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csl.2013.07.005
Tang P, Rattanasone NX, Yuen I, Demuth K (2017) Phonetic enhancement of Mandarin vowels and tones: Infant-directed speech and Lombard speech. J Acoust Soc Am 142: 493–503. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4995998
Kawase S, Smith ML, Wright R (2019) Exploring the Lombard Effect in first language Japanese speakers of English. J Acoust Soc Am 146: 2843–2843. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5136861
Lyakso EE, Grigorev AS (2013) Dynamics of duration and frequency characteristics the vowels over the first seven years of life of children. Russ J Physiol 99: 1097–1110. (In Russ).
Bondarko LV (1998) Phonetics of the modern russian language. SPB Univer, S-Peterburg. (In Russ).
Nicolaidis K, Sfakianaki A (2016) Acoustic characteristics of vowels produced by Greek intelligible speakers with profound hearing impairment I: Examination of vowel space. Int J Speech-Lang Pathol 18: 378–387. https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2015.1101155
Mora R, Crippa B, Cervoni E, Santomauro V, Guastini L (2012) Acoustic features of voice in patients with severe hearing loss. J Otolaryngol-Head and Neck Surg 41: 8–13. https://doi.org/10.2310/7070.2011.110150
Vorperian H, Kent RD (2007) Vowel acoustic space development in children: A synthesis of acoustic and anatomic data. J Speech Lang Hear Res 50: 1510–1545. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2007/104)
Sapir S, Ramig LO, Spielman JL, Fox C (2010) Formant centralization ratio: a proposal for a new acoustic measure of dysarthric speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res 53: 114–125. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0184)
Sapir S, Spielman J, Ramig L, Story BH, Fox C (2007) Effects of intensive voice treatment (the Lee Silverman Voice Treatment [LSVT]) on vowel articulation in dysarthric individuals with idiopathic Parkinson disease: acoustic and perceptual findings. J Speech Lang Hear Res 50: 899–912. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2007/064)
Moura C, Cunha L, Vilarinho H, Cunha MJ, Freitas D, Palha M, Pueschel S, Pais-Clemente M (2008) Voice parameters in children with Down syndrome. J Voice 22: 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2006.08.011
Leder SB, Spitzer JB (1993) Speaking fundamental frequency, intensity, and rate of adventitiously profoundly hearing-impaired adult women. J Acoust Soc Am 93: 2146–2151. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.406677
Langereis MC, Bosman AJ, van Olphen AF, Smoorenburg GF (1998) Effect of cochlear implantation on voice fundamental frequency in post-lingually deafened adults. Audiology 37: 219–230. https://doi.org/10.3109/00206099809072976
Baraldi GS, Almeida LC, Calais LL, Borges AC, Gielow I, Cunto MR (2007) Study of the findamental frequency in elderly women with hearing loss. Rev Bras Otrrinolaringol 73: 378–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1808-8694(15)30082-3
Lee GS, Lin SH (2009) Changes of rhythm of vocal fundamental frequency in sensorineural hearing loss and in Parkinson’s disease. Chin J Physiol 52: 446–450. https://doi.org/10.4077/CJP.2009.AMH074
Nicolaidis K, Sfakianaki A (2016) Acoustic characteristics of vowels produced by Greek intelligible speakers with profound hearing impairment I: Examination of vowel space. Int J Speech-Lang Pathol 18: 378–387. https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2015.1101155
Hotchkin C, Parks S (2013) The Lombard effect and other noise-induced vocal modifications: insight from mammalian communication systems. Biol Rev 88: 809–824. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12026
Luo J, Hage SR, Moss CF (2018) The Lombard effect: from acoustics to neural mechanisms. Trends Neurosci 41: 938–949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2018.07.011
Kleczkowski P, Żak A, Król-Nowak A (2017) Lombard effect in Polish speech and its comparison in English speech. Arch Acoust 42: 561–569. https://doi.org/10.1515/aoa-2017-0060
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors are grateful to L.G. Zaitseva for her advice in processing the speech material.
Funding
The work was supported by funds from the state budget under the state assignment (subject no. 075-00967-23-00).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Idea of work and planning the experiment (L.E.G., I.G.A., K.S.Sh.), methodology preparation (I.G.A., A.P.G.), data collection (K.S.Sh., A.M.L.), data processing (K.S.Sh., A.M.L.), writing and editing the manuscript (K.S.Sh., I.G.A., A.M.L., A.P.G., L.E.G.).
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
COMPLIANCE WITH ETHICAL STANDARDS
All procedures performed in the present study involving humans complied with the requirements of the Ethical Committee of the Municipal Geriatric Medical and Social Center, Saint Petersburg (Protocol no. 9 of October 14, 2021), the Ethical Committee of the Sechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry, and the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 (Protocol no. 3-02 of February 26, 2021), and the Declaration of Helsinki, 1964, as subsequently amended (Protocol no. 3-02, February 26, 2021). Before starting the experiment, each subject signed an informed consent.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Translated by A. Dyomina
Russian Text © The Author(s), 2023, published in Rossiiskii Fiziologicheskii Zhurnal imeni I.M. Sechenova, 2023, Vol. 109, No. 4, pp. 489–501https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869813923040106.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shtin, K.S., Lunichkin, A.M., Gvozdeva, A.P. et al. Spectral Characteristics of Cardinal Vowels as Indicators of the Auditory Speech Feedback Control in Patients with Moderate and Moderately Severe Chronic Postlingual Sensorineural Hearing Loss. J Evol Biochem Phys 59, 596–606 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0022093023020254
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0022093023020254