Log in

Spectral Characteristics of Cardinal Vowels as Indicators of the Auditory Speech Feedback Control in Patients with Moderate and Moderately Severe Chronic Postlingual Sensorineural Hearing Loss

  • Experimental Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Evolutionary Biochemistry and Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chronic sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) is characterized by an increase in hearing thresholds at basic speech frequencies, which implies deterioration of auditory speech feedback control and, as a result, changes of speech characteristics. A hypothesis was tested that such deterioration can manifest itself in an increase of F0, F1, F2 formants of speech vowel in patients with moderate and moderately severe postlingual SNHL. Recordings of elicited speech were performed for young and middle age women (36–59 years): 7 women speakers with moderate SNHL who did not use hearing aids; 5 women speakers with moderately severe SNHL who were hearing aids users but were not using them during the recordings; a control group of 12 normally hearing women speakers. An assessment of F0, F1 and F2 of stressed vowels [a], [i], [u] and calculations of vowels’ centralization indices—vowel space area, vowel formant centralization ratio and the second formant ratio (F2i/F2u), were performed. All the studied spectral indices in groups of patients with postlingual SNHL were similar to those in the control group, no statistically reliable differences were revealed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.

REFERENCES

  1. Selleck MA, Sataloff RT (2014) The impact of the auditory system on phonation: a review. J Voice 28: 688–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.03.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Perkell JS (2012) Movement goals and feedback and feedforward control mechanisms in speech production. J Neurolinguistics 25: 382–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2010.02.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bolfan-Stosic N, Simunjak B (2007) Effects of hearing loss on the voice in children. J Otolaryngol 36: 120–123. https://doi.org/10.2310/7070.2007.0009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dehqan A, Scherer RC (2011) Objective voice analysis of boys with profound hearing loss. J Voice 25: 61–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2010.08.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schenk BS, Baumgatner WD, Hamzavi J-S (2003) Effect of the loss of auditory feedback on segmental parameters of vowels of postlingually deafened speakers. Auris Nasus Larynx 30: 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0385-8146(03)00093-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Subtelny JD, Whitehead RL, Samar VJ (1992) Spectral study of deviant resonance in the speech of woman who are deaf. J Speech Lang Hear Res 35: 574–579. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3503.574

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Naderifar E, Ghorbani A, Moradi N, Ansari H (2019) Use of formant centralization ratio for vowel impairment detection in normal hearing and different degrees of hearing impairment Logoped Phoniatr Vocol 44: 159–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/14015439.2018.1545867

  8. Hilger AI, Kim SJ, Lester-Smith R, Larson CR (2019) Auditory feedback control of vocal intensity during speech and sustained-vowel production. J Acoust Soc Am 146: 3052 https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5137580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Weerathunge HR, Voon T, Tardif M, Cilento D, Stepp CE (2022) Auditory and somatosensory feedback mechanisms of laryngeal and articulatory speech motor control. Exp Brain Res 240: 2155–2173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-022-06395-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Luan Y, Wang C, Jiao Y, Tang T, Zhang J, Teng G-J (2019) Dysconnectivity of multiple resting-state networks associated with higher-order functions in sensorineural hearing loss. Front Neurosci 13: 55. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00055

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Husain FT, Carpenter-Thompson JR, Schmidt SA (2014) The effect of mild-to-moderate hearing loss on auditory and emotion processing networks. Front Neurosci 8: 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Coelho AC, Medved DM, Brasolotto AG (2015) Hearing loss and the voice. Update On Hearing Loss: 103–128. https://doi.org/10.5772/61217

  13. Garnier M, Henrich N (2014) Speaking in noise: How does the Lombard effect improve acoustic contrasts between speech and ambient noise? Comput Speech and Language 28: 580–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csl.2013.07.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tang P, Rattanasone NX, Yuen I, Demuth K (2017) Phonetic enhancement of Mandarin vowels and tones: Infant-directed speech and Lombard speech. J Acoust Soc Am 142: 493–503. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4995998

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kawase S, Smith ML, Wright R (2019) Exploring the Lombard Effect in first language Japanese speakers of English. J Acoust Soc Am 146: 2843–2843. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5136861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lyakso EE, Grigorev AS (2013) Dynamics of duration and frequency characteristics the vowels over the first seven years of life of children. Russ J Physiol 99: 1097–1110. (In Russ).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bondarko LV (1998) Phonetics of the modern russian language. SPB Univer, S-Peterburg. (In Russ).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nicolaidis K, Sfakianaki A (2016) Acoustic characteristics of vowels produced by Greek intelligible speakers with profound hearing impairment I: Examination of vowel space. Int J Speech-Lang Pathol 18: 378–387. https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2015.1101155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mora R, Crippa B, Cervoni E, Santomauro V, Guastini L (2012) Acoustic features of voice in patients with severe hearing loss. J Otolaryngol-Head and Neck Surg 41: 8–13. https://doi.org/10.2310/7070.2011.110150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vorperian H, Kent RD (2007) Vowel acoustic space development in children: A synthesis of acoustic and anatomic data. J Speech Lang Hear Res 50: 1510–1545. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2007/104)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sapir S, Ramig LO, Spielman JL, Fox C (2010) Formant centralization ratio: a proposal for a new acoustic measure of dysarthric speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res 53: 114–125. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0184)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sapir S, Spielman J, Ramig L, Story BH, Fox C (2007) Effects of intensive voice treatment (the Lee Silverman Voice Treatment [LSVT]) on vowel articulation in dysarthric individuals with idiopathic Parkinson disease: acoustic and perceptual findings. J Speech Lang Hear Res 50: 899–912. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2007/064)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Moura C, Cunha L, Vilarinho H, Cunha MJ, Freitas D, Palha M, Pueschel S, Pais-Clemente M (2008) Voice parameters in children with Down syndrome. J Voice 22: 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2006.08.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Leder SB, Spitzer JB (1993) Speaking fundamental frequency, intensity, and rate of adventitiously profoundly hearing-impaired adult women. J Acoust Soc Am 93: 2146–2151. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.406677

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Langereis MC, Bosman AJ, van Olphen AF, Smoorenburg GF (1998) Effect of cochlear implantation on voice fundamental frequency in post-lingually deafened adults. Audiology 37: 219–230. https://doi.org/10.3109/00206099809072976

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Baraldi GS, Almeida LC, Calais LL, Borges AC, Gielow I, Cunto MR (2007) Study of the findamental frequency in elderly women with hearing loss. Rev Bras Otrrinolaringol 73: 378–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1808-8694(15)30082-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee GS, Lin SH (2009) Changes of rhythm of vocal fundamental frequency in sensorineural hearing loss and in Parkinson’s disease. Chin J Physiol 52: 446–450. https://doi.org/10.4077/CJP.2009.AMH074

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nicolaidis K, Sfakianaki A (2016) Acoustic characteristics of vowels produced by Greek intelligible speakers with profound hearing impairment I: Examination of vowel space. Int J Speech-Lang Pathol 18: 378–387. https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2015.1101155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hotchkin C, Parks S (2013) The Lombard effect and other noise-induced vocal modifications: insight from mammalian communication systems. Biol Rev 88: 809–824. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Luo J, Hage SR, Moss CF (2018) The Lombard effect: from acoustics to neural mechanisms. Trends Neurosci 41: 938–949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2018.07.011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kleczkowski P, Żak A, Król-Nowak A (2017) Lombard effect in Polish speech and its comparison in English speech. Arch Acoust 42: 561–569. https://doi.org/10.1515/aoa-2017-0060

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors are grateful to L.G. Zaitseva for her advice in processing the speech material.

Funding

The work was supported by funds from the state budget under the state assignment (subject no. 075-00967-23-00).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Idea of work and planning the experiment (L.E.G., I.G.A., K.S.Sh.), methodology preparation (I.G.A., A.P.G.), data collection (K.S.Sh., A.M.L.), data processing (K.S.Sh., A.M.L.), writing and editing the manuscript (K.S.Sh., I.G.A., A.M.L., A.P.G., L.E.G.).

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. S. Shtin.

Ethics declarations

COMPLIANCE WITH ETHICAL STANDARDS

All procedures performed in the present study involving humans complied with the requirements of the Ethical Committee of the Municipal Geriatric Medical and Social Center, Saint Petersburg (Protocol no. 9 of October 14, 2021), the Ethical Committee of the Sechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry, and the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 (Protocol no. 3-02 of February 26, 2021), and the Declaration of Helsinki, 1964, as subsequently amended (Protocol no. 3-02, February 26, 2021). Before starting the experiment, each subject signed an informed consent.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated by A. Dyomina

Russian Text © The Author(s), 2023, published in Rossiiskii Fiziologicheskii Zhurnal imeni I.M. Sechenova, 2023, Vol. 109, No. 4, pp. 489–501https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869813923040106.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shtin, K.S., Lunichkin, A.M., Gvozdeva, A.P. et al. Spectral Characteristics of Cardinal Vowels as Indicators of the Auditory Speech Feedback Control in Patients with Moderate and Moderately Severe Chronic Postlingual Sensorineural Hearing Loss. J Evol Biochem Phys 59, 596–606 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0022093023020254

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0022093023020254

Keywords:

Navigation