Log in

Integrated predictive modeling of JET H-mode plasma with type-I and type-III ELMs

  • Tokamaks
  • Published:
Plasma Physics Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Edge plasma parameters influence plasma performance in many different ways (profile stiffness is probably one of the best known examples). In the ELMy H-mode plasma, a thin region with improved transport characteristics (the edge transport barrier) links the core and the scrape-off layer. There is a strong coupling between these three areas, so that even a modest variation of plasma parameters in one region can lead to a dramatic change in the overall plasma performance. A systematic MHD stability analysis and self-consistent integrated predictive modeling of a series of JET ELMy H-mode plasmas, including scans in gas fueling and triangularity, are presented. The main conclusion is that plasma performance indeed sensitively depends on the edge plasma parameters, which should be modeled in a self-consistent way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G. Saibene, R. Sartori, A. Loarte, et al., Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 44, 1769 (2000).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. R. Sartori, B. Balet, S. Clement, et al., Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 40, 757 (1998); R. Sartori, D. Bobra, G. D. Conway, et al., in Proceedings of the 26th EPS Conference on Controlled Fusion and Plasma Physics, Maastricht, 1999, ECA 23J, 197 (1999).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. G. Cenacchi and F. Taroni, Rep. JET-IR(88)03 (JET Joint Undertaking, Abingdon, 1988).

  4. R. Simonini, G. Corrigan, G. Radford, et al., Contrib. Plasma Phys. 34, 368 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  5. V. Parail, G. Corrigan, D. Heading, et al., in Proceedings of the 27th EPS Conference on Controlled Fusion and Plasma Physics, Budapest, 2000, ECA 24B, 61 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  6. T. Onjun, G. Bateman, A. H. Kritz, and G. Hammett, Phys. Plasmas 9, 5018 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. A. B. Mikhailovskii, G. T. A. Huysmans, W. O. K. Kerner, and S. E. Sharapov, Fiz. Plazmy 23, 916 (1997) [Plasma Phys. Rep. 23, 844 (1997)].

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. B. Snyder, H. R. Wilson, J. R. Ferron, et al., Phys. Plasmas 9, 2037 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. G. Saibene, L. D. Horton, R. Sartori, et al., Nucl. Fusion 39, 1133 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Additional information

I devote this paper and my very best wishes to Prof. L.I. Rudakov—my “Teacher of Teacher” in Plasma Physics V. Parail

From Fizika Plazmy, Vol. 29, No. 7, 2003, pp. 581–587.

Original English Text Copyright © 2003 by Parail, Bateman, Becoulet, Corrigan, Heading, Hogan, Houlberg, Huysmans, Kinsey, Korotkov, Kritz, Loarte, Lonnroth, McDonald, Monier-Garbet, Onjun, Saibene, Sartori, Sharapov, Wilson, and JET-EFDA contributors.

This article was submitted by the authors in English.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parail, V., Bateman, G., Becoulet, M. et al. Integrated predictive modeling of JET H-mode plasma with type-I and type-III ELMs. Plasma Phys. Rep. 29, 539–544 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1134/1.1592551

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/1.1592551

Keywords

Navigation