Log in

Book now, pay later: the effects of delays in payments and temporal distance on consumers’ perceptions and purchase intention

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management Aims and scope

Abstract

In today’s hotel industry, ‘book now, pay later’ practice is widespread. However, despite the prevalence of this phenomenon, the psychological and behavioral influences of ‘book now, pay later’ transactions on consumers have received almost no research attention. Using an experimental design, this research examined how deferred payments influence consumers’ perceived price, perceived risks, and purchase intention according to the time of booking in the leisure travel context. The results demonstrated that people perceived less risks and had a greater purchase intention when a hotel offered the ‘pay later’ option compared to the ‘pay now’ option. However, individuals planning a trip in the near future did not show any significant differences in perceived risks and purchase intention between the options of ‘pay later’ and ‘pay now’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainslie, G., and A. George. 2001. Breakdown of will. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Anan, Y., N. Liberman, and Y. Trope. 2006. The association between psychological distance and construal level: Evidence from an implicit association test. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 135 (4): 609–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benhabib, J., A. Bisin, and A. Schotter. 2010. Present-bias, quasi-hyperbolic discounting, and fixed costs. Games and Economic Behavior 69 (2): 205–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biucky, S.T., and S.R. Harandi. 2017. The effects of perceived risk on social commerce adoption based on TAM model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce Studies 8 (2): 173–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhrmester, M., T. Kwang, and S.D. Gosling. 2011. Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science 6 (1): 3–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, G.B. 1996. Temporal discounting and utility for health and money. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 22 (3): 771–791.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C., and Z. Schwartz. 2008. Room rate patterns and customers’ propensity to book a hotel room. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research 32 (3): 287–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiang, C.F., and S.S. Jang. 2007. The effects of perceived price and brand image on value and purchase intention: Leisure travelers’ attitudes toward online hotel booking. Journal of Hospitality and Leisure Marketing 15 (3): 49–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crompton, J.L. 2016. Implications of prospect theory for the pricing of leisure services. Leisure Sciences 38 (4): 315–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, S.M. 1967. The major dimensions of perceived risk. In Risk taking and information handling in consumer behavior, ed. D.F. Cox. Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, G.R., and R. Staelin. 1994. A model of perceived risk and intended risk-handling activity. Journal of Consumer Research 21 (1): 119–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Featherman, M.S., and P.A. Pavlou. 2003. Predicting e-services adoption: A perceived risk facets perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 59 (4): 451–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fram, E.H., and M.S. McCarthy. 1999. The true price of penalties. Marketing Management 8 (3): 48–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardisty, D.J., K.C. Appelt, and E.U. Weber. 2013. Good or bad, we want it now: Fixed-cost present bias for gains and losses explains magnitude asymmetries in intertemporal choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 26 (4): 348–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, J., and L.B. Kaplan. 1972. The components of perceived risk. In Proceedings of the annual conference of the association for consumer research, ed. M. Venkateran. College Park: Association for Consumer Research.

  • Jang, Y., L. Miao, and C.C. Chen. 2021. Pay now or pay later: The impact of time on payment preference in hotel booking. Journal of Vacation Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1177/13567667211066323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keaveney, S.M. 1995. Customer switching behavior in service industries: An exploratory study. Journal of Marketing 59 (2): 71–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M.K., Y. Chang, S.F. Wong, and M.C. Park. 2015. The effect of perceived risks and switching barriers on the intention to use smartphones among non-adopters in Korea. Information Development 31 (3): 258–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knutson, B.J. 1988. Frequent travelers: Making them happy and bringing them back. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly 29 (1): 82–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lien, C.H., M.J. Wen, L.C. Huang, and K.L. Wu. 2015. Online hotel booking: The effects of brand image, price, trust and value on purchase intentions. Asia Pacific Management Review 20 (4): 210–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masiero, L., G. Viglia, and M. Nieto-Garcia. 2020. Strategic consumer behavior in online hotel booking. Annals of Tourism Research 83: 102947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, J., D. Lee, and J. Ahn. 2004. Risk-focused e-commerce adoption model: A cross-country study. Journal of Global Information Technology Management 7 (2): 6–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, S., and I.P. Tussyadiah. 2017. Multidimensional facets of perceived risk in mobile travel booking. Journal of Travel Research 56 (7): 854–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patak, M., and B. Reynolds. 2007. Question-based assessments of delay discounting: Do respondents spontaneously incorporate uncertainty into their valuations for delayed rewards?”. Addictive Behaviors 32 (2): 351–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prelec, D., and G. Loewenstein. 1998. The red and the black: Mental accounting of savings and debt. Marketing Science 17 (1): 4–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pura, M. 2005. Linking perceived value and loyalty in location-based mobile services. Managing Service Quality 15 (6): 509–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Retail Dive. 2017. Expedia boosts mobile momentum with new booking options. https://www.retaildive.com/ex/mobilecommercedaily/expedia-celebrates-mobile-growth-with-major-app-updates. Accessed 20 Apr 2022.

  • Ryu, K., and H. Han. 2010. Influence of the quality of food, service, and physical environment on customer satisfaction and behavioral intention in quick-casual restaurants: Moderating role of perceived price. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research 34 (3): 310–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiffman, L.G., and L.L. Kanuk. 2009. Consumer behavior. Harlow: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siemens, J.C. 2007. When consumption benefits precede costs: Towards an understanding of ‘buy now, pay later’ transactions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 20 (5): 521–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, M., B.M. Noone, and R.J. Han. 2019. An examination of the role of booking lead time in consumers’ reactions to online scarcity messages. International Journal of Hospitality Management 77: 483–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, E., N. Liberman, and Y. Trope. 2011. The effects of time perspective and level of construal on social distance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 47 (2): 397–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Travel Association. 2020. U.S. Travel Answer Sheet. https://www.ustravel.org/system/files/media_root/document/Research_Fact-Sheet_US-Travel-Answer-Sheet.pdf. Accessed 19 Sep 2022.

  • USA Today. 2021. Book now, pay later: The new trend that’s resha** travel during the pandemic. https://www.usatoday.com/story/travel/advice/2021/01/27/covid-travel-book-now-pay-later-trend-reshapes-pandemic-trips/4261849001. Accessed 20 Apr 2022.

Download references

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yisak Jang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jang, Y., Miao, L. & Chen, CC. Book now, pay later: the effects of delays in payments and temporal distance on consumers’ perceptions and purchase intention. J Revenue Pricing Manag 22, 374–384 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41272-022-00416-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41272-022-00416-4

Keywords

Navigation