Abstract
Background/Objective
Dark adaptation measures photoreceptor recovery following intense light stimulation. Time to recovery reflects retinal function. We describe a novel method of relative foveal dark adaptation using an iPhone. Data from a small number of healthy subjects were studied to assess reproducibility, effects of age, and consider potential clinical utility.
Methods
Relative foveal dark adaption was studied in 6 normal subjects across ages from 20 to 81 years and across differing testing conditions. Foveal bleaching is produced by fixating a bright white circle on an iPhone for variable times. After foveal bleaching an annular surround appears to complete a bullseye stimulus with surround initially brighter than centre. As the fovea recovers the centre regains brightness. Relative foveal dark adaptation, the time for the visual anchor to shift from surround to centre, was studied across a range of bleaching times, ages, and testing conditions.
Results
Dispersion of dark adaptation times grows with increasing age. Foveal bleaching for 30 s was as effective as longer times. Testing times with a 30 s bleach were less than 1 min. Foveal dark adaptation was reproducible within each subject and was unaffected by ambient room lighting, pupil size, and light attenuation. Repeat, immediately sequential testing was similarly reproducible except after long bleaching.
Conclusions
This method of dark adaptation is intuitive, repeatable, and relatively unaffected by testing condition. Testing times are brief, requiring only an iPhone screen positioned at reading distance. Relative foveal dark adaptation may be a useful tool to assess macular health.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41433-024-03201-2/MediaObjects/41433_2024_3201_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41433-024-03201-2/MediaObjects/41433_2024_3201_Fig2_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Raw data from this study can be requested by contacting Dr. Kane. Code for the MacDx® adaptometer is the property of AMA Optics, Inc. AMA Optics can be contacted if more information about the app is desired.
References
Quillen DA. Common causes of vision loss in elderly patients. Am Fam Physician. 1999;60:99–108.
Flaxel CJ, Adelman RA, Bailey ST, Fawzi A, Lim JI, Vemulakonda GA, et al. Age-Related Macular Degeneration Preferred Practice Pattern. Ophthalmology. 2019;127:1–65.
McBee JK, Palczewski K, Baehr W, Pepperberg DR. Confronting complexity: The Interlink of phototransduction and retinoid metabolism in the vertebrate retina. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2001;20:469–529.
Bailliart JP. Le Scotome central provoque. Bull Soc Opth. 1954;LIV:13–16.
Glaser JS, Savino PJ, Sumers KD, McDonald SA, Knighton RW. The photostress recovery test in the clinical assessment of visual function. Am J Ophthalmol. 1977;83:255–60.
Hecht S. The nature of foveal dark adaptation. J Gen Physiol. 1921;4:113–39.
Lamb TD, Pugh EN. Dark adaptation and the retinoid cycle of Vision. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2004;23:307–80.
Mote FA, Riopelle AJ. The effect of varying the intensity and the duration of pre-exposure upon subsequent dark adaptation in the human eye. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1953;46:49–55.
Aubert H. Physiologie der Netzhaut. Breslau: E. Morgenstern; 1865.
Cobb PW. Dark-adaptation with especial reference to the problems of night flying. Psychological Rev. 1919;26:428–53.
Bierings RA, Kuiper M, van Berkel CM, Overkempe T, Jansonius NM. Foveal light and dark adaptation in patients with glaucoma and healthy subjects: A case-control study. Plos One. 2018;13:e0193663.
Newsome DA, Negreiro M. Reproducible measurement of Macular Light Flash Recovery Time using a novel device can indicate the presence and worsening of macular diseases. Curr Eye Res. 2009;34:162–70.
Jackson GR, Edwards JG. A short-duration dark adaptation protocol for assessment of age-related maculopathy. J Ocul Biol Dis Info. 2008;1:7–11.
Jackson GR, Owsley C, McGwin G. Aging and dark adaptation. Vis Res. 1999;39:3975–82.
Rodriguez JD, Lane K, Hollander DA, Shapiro A, Saigal S, Hertsenberg AJ, et al. Cone photoreceptor macular function and recovery after photostress in early non-exudative age-related macular degeneration. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:1325–35.
Owsley C, McGwin G, Clark ME, Jackson GR, Callahan MA, Kline LB, et al. Delayed rod-mediated dark adaptation is a functional biomarker for incident early age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:344–51.
Lindstrom D. Schaum’s Easy Outline of Statistics, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill Education; 2010.
Guyton DL, West CE, Miller JM, Wisnicki HJ. Ophthalmic Optics and Clinical Refraction. Baltimore, MD: Prism Press; 1999. pp 63–4.
Schubert HD. Structure and function of the neural retina. In: Yanoff M, Duker JS editors. Ophthalmology. London; Mosby: 1999.
Li X, Gilchrist AL. Relative area and relative luminence combine to anchor surface lightness values. Percept Psychophys. 1999;61:771–85.
Gaffney AJ, Binns AM, Margrain TH. Aging and Cone Dark Adaptation. Optom Vis Sci. 2012;89:1219–24.
Gaffney AJ, Binns AM, Mar Grain TH. Measurement of cone dark adaptation: a comparison of four psychophysical methods. Doc Ophthalmol. 2014;128:33–41.
Robinson DG, Margrain TH, Bailey C, Binns AM. An evaluation of a battery of functional and structural tests as predictors of likely risk of progression of age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019;60:580–9.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Dr. Phyllis Faust for reading the manuscript and for helpful suggestions.
Funding
The MacDx® adaptometer app was generously provided by AMA Optics, Inc., Miami Beach, FL, USA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors whose names appear on this submission made substantial contributions to the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data, discussed the results, commented on the manuscript, and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. JK took the lead in writing the manuscript. She drafted the work and revised it critically for important intellectual content. MG verified the analytical methods and participated in study design and data acquisition. AG participated in study design and data acquisition and was particularly helpful for the analysis of bleaching time durations. HP supervised the study and IRB requirements and provided critical feedback. SK participated in study design, arranged for IRB supervision, and supervised data collection, subject consents, data storage, and data interpretation.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Kane, J.S., Gaspich, M., Gold, A. et al. Relative foveal dark adaptation: a potential method for assessing macular health. Eye (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-024-03201-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-024-03201-2
- Springer Nature Limited