Log in

A semi-structured interview to capture manual wheelchair use for mobility activities among individuals with spinal cord injury in real-life situations: development and content validity of the Wheelchair Mobility Activity Log (WC-MAL)

  • Article
  • Published:
Spinal Cord Submit manuscript

Abstract

Study design

Mixed-method approach.

Objectives

To develop and assess the content validity of a semi-structured interview that captures the lived experience of using a manual wheelchair among individuals with SCI in the real world, the Wheelchair Mobility Activity Log (WC-MAL).

Setting

SCIR-Group (UDESC)/Brazil.

Methods

Develo** the WC-MAL comprised five steps: (1) defining the construct—based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF); (2) identifying relevant activities from other assessment instruments and interviews with the end-users (14 Individuals with SCI and 13 rehabilitation professionals); (3) Selecting the items – activities were linked to ICF codes and grouped into sets; (4) develo** the scoring scales based on interviews with the end-users; and, (5) evaluating content validity in accordance with the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN). The content validity ratio (CVR) for each item and scale and the overall instrument content validity index (CVI) were calculated.

Results

From an initial draft of 295 activities identified, a set of 222 activities was linked to the ICF domain of “Mobility (d4)” and further refined to generate the 23 items in the WC-MAL. Three scales were developed to assess Frequency (how often), Performance (how well), and Assistance (assistance needed) levels. The items and scales showed a CVR superior to the critical value established (≥0.64). The general CVI value was 0.96.

Conclusion

The WC-MAL is a promising clinical instrument with adequate content validity to assess the spontaneous use of the manual wheelchair in the real world among individuals with SCI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data will be available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Florio J, Arnet U, Gemperli A, Hinrichs T, Swi SCIsg. Need and use of assistive devices for personal mobility by individuals with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2016;39:461–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Hosseini SM, Oyster ML, Kirby RL, Harrington AL, Boninger ML. Manual wheelchair skills capacity predicts quality of life and community integration in persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93:2237–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Abou L, Rice LA. Predictors of participation enfranchisement of wheelchair users with spinal cord injury in the United States. J Spinal Cord Med. 2023;46:789–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. de Freitas GR, Abou L, de Lima A, Rice LA, Ilha J. Measurement properties of clinical instruments for assessing manual wheelchair mobility in individuals with spinal cord injury: systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023;104:656–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mortenson WB, Miller WC, Miller-Pogar J. Measuring wheelchair intervention outcomes: development of the wheelchair outcome measure. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007;2:275–85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Miller WC, Garden J, Mortenson WB. Measurement properties of the wheelchair outcome measure in individuals with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2011;49:995–1000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kirby RL, Worobey LA, Cowan R, Pedersen JP, Heinemann AW, Dyson-Hudson TA, et al. Wheelchair skills capacity and performance of manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97:1761–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dalhousie University. Wheelchair Skills Program Manual Version 5.4.1 (2023). Published electronically in Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. https://wheelchairskillsprogram.ca/en/skills-manual-forms/.

  9. Mountain AD, Kirby RL, Smith C. The wheelchair skills test, version 2.4: Validity of an algorithm-based questionnaire version. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:416–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mortenson WB, Miller WC, Auger C. Issues for the selection of wheelchair-specific activity and participation outcome measures: a review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:1177–86.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. MacDuff H, Armstrong E, Ferguson-Pell M. Technologies measuring manual wheelchair propulsion metrics: a sco** review. Assist Technol. 2022:1–9.

  12. Jahanian O, Gaglio A, Cho CC, Muqeet V, Smith R, Morrow MMB, et al. Hand-rim biomechanics during geared manual wheelchair propulsion over different ground conditions in individuals with spinal cord injury. J Biomech. 2022;142:111235.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Hiremath SV, Ding D, Farringdon J, Vyas N, Cooper RA. Physical activity classification utilizing SenseWear activity monitor in manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2013;51:705–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Meadows KA. Patient-reported outcome measures: an overview. Br J Community Nurs. 2011;16:146–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. de Vet HT, CB Terwee, Mokkink LB, Knol DL. Measurements in Medicine: a practical guide. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge; 2011.

  16. Terwee CB, Prinsen CAC, Chiarotto A, Westerman MJ, Patrick DL, Alonso J, et al. COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2018;27:1159–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data: Geneva, 2001.

  18. Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, Light K, Thompson PA. The motor activity log-28: assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Neurology. 2006;67:1189–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dos Anjos SM, Mark VW, Rodriguez CM, Morris DM, Crago JE, King DK, et al. Reliability and validity of the lower extremity motor activity log for measuring real-world leg use in adults with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021;102:626–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. de Faria LC, Marques DB, Gomes LHSC, Dos Anjos S, Pereira ND. Self-reported use of the paretic lower extremity of people with stroke: a reliability and validity study of the Lower-Extremity Motor Activity Log (LE-MAL)—Brazil. Physiother Theory Pr. 2023;39:1727–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Haddad MM, Taub E, Uswatte G, Johnson ML, Mark VW, Barghi A, et al. Assessing the amount of spontaneous real-world spoken language in aphasia: validation of two methods. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017;26:316–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Blake JAMB, McKay S, Uswatte G, Taub E. The transfer of cognitive training to real-world functioning: results of our first six pilot subjects at six-month follow-up. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2021;36:2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bayley MT, Kirby RL, Farahani F, Titus L, Smith C, Routhier F, et al. Development of Wheeled Mobility indicators to advance the quality of spinal cord injury rehabilitation: SCI-High Project. J spinal cord Med. 2019;42:130–40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Lo Iacono VSP, Brown DHK. Skype as a tool for qualitative research interviews. Socio Res Online. 2016;21:12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cieza A, Fayed N, Bickenbach J, Prodinger B. Refinements of the ICF linking rules to strengthen their potential for establishing comparability of health information. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41:574–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Streiner DLNG, Cairney J. Health Measurement Scales: A practical guide to their development and use. 5th ed. Oxford University Press: Oxford; 2015.

  27. Lawshe C. A quantitative approach to content validity. Pers Psychol. 1975;28:12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kondracki NL, Wellman NS, Amundson DR. Content analysis: review of methods and their applications in nutrition education. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2002;34:224–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Powell PA, Carlton J, Rowen D, Chandler F, Guglieri M, Brazier JE. Development of a new quality of life measure for Duchenne muscular dystrophy using mixed methods: the DMD-QoL. Neurology. 2021;96:e2438–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Carlton J. Identifying potential themes for the Child Amblyopia Treatment Questionnaire. Optom Vis Sci. 2013;90:867–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Gilbert GE, Prion S. Making sense of methods and measurement: Lawshe’s content validity index. Clin Simul Nurs. 2016;12:2.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ayre C, Scally AJ. Critical values for Lawshe’s content validity ratio: revisiting the original methods of calculation. Meas Eval Couns Dev. 2014;47:79–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Davis L. Instrument review: getting the most from a panel of experts. Appl Nurs Res. 1992;5:4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Vier C, Mochizuki L, Gomes RP, Rodrigues LC, Demartino AM, Michaelsen SM. Bilateral capacity is related to bilateral upper limb use after stroke: a study by behavioral maps, accelerometers and perceived amount of use. Disabil Rehabil. 2022;44:2258–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rast FM, Labruyere R. Systematic review on the application of wearable inertial sensors to quantify everyday life motor activity in people with mobility impairments. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020;17:148.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Ustun TB, Chatterji S, Bickenbach J, Kostanjsek N, Schneider M. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: a new tool for understanding disability and health. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25:565–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Prinsen CA, Vohra S, Rose MR, Boers M, Tugwell P, Clarke M, et al. How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set”—a practical guideline. Trials. 2016;17:449.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to all participants of the study for their time.

Funding

This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Brazil—Finance Code 001; and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e Inovação do Estado de Santa Catarina (FAPESC), Brazil—TO 2023TR501.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

GSS, NDP, and JI contributed to the study conceptualisation and design. GSS and LOA contributed to the data collection. GSS, NDP, LOA, and JI contributed to the data analysis. GSS, NDP, LOA, and JI contributed to the data interpretation. SMA and DMM contributed to the transcultural adaptation. GSS and JI wrote the manuscript. GSS, NDP, LOA, SMA, and DMM preview the manuscript prior to submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jocemar Ilha.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sprizon, G.S., Pereira, N.D., Almeida, L.O. et al. A semi-structured interview to capture manual wheelchair use for mobility activities among individuals with spinal cord injury in real-life situations: development and content validity of the Wheelchair Mobility Activity Log (WC-MAL). Spinal Cord (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-024-01011-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-024-01011-7

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation