Log in

Altered Pharmacokinetics and Dynamics of Apomorphine in the Malnourished Rat: Modeling of the Composed Relationship Between Concentration and Heart-Rate Response

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The impact of malnutrition on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (change in heart rate) of apomorphine was studied in the rat. One group of rats received a low-protein diet (0.5%) ad libitum to produce prekwashiorkor. The control group received commercial food pellets. In the first experiment, the two groups received a 2 mg/kg iv bolus dose of apomorphine to determine any differences in the basic pharmacokinetic parameters. The pharmacodynamic characteristics in each group were studied at different steady-state plasma levels, achieved by iv infusions with continuous measurements of the heart rate. There was an almost twofold decrease in the plasma clearance in the malnourished rats compared with controls. A pronounced change in the pharmacodynamic response was also observed in the malnourished group. In the control group, apomorphine produced bradycardia at low concentrations and tachycardia at high concentrations, while only bradycardia was registered in the malnourished group, with maximum effects at steady-state plasma concentrations of 50 ng/ml and a return to baseline at higher concentrations. The effects in control and malnourished rats were fitted simultaneously to the sum of two Hill equations with a nonlinear regression program, and the fits were compared by means of an F test. The maximum pure tachycardia obtainable differed significantly in the prekwashiorkor group compared to the control group. These results suggest a selective down regulation/desensitization only of the receptors responsible for the tachycardia produced by apomorphine during malnutrition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. L. Z. Benet (ed.), The Effect on Disease States on Drug Pharmacokinetics, American Pharmaceutical Association, Washington, D.C., 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Kato. Xenobiotica 7:25–92 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Danhof, M. Hisaoka, and G. Levy. J. Pharm. Exp. Ther. 230:627–631 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Hisaoka and G. Levy. J. Pharm. Exp. Ther. 232:722–724 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  5. U. Strömbom. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg Arch. Pharmacol. 292:167–176 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  6. U. Havemann, B. Magnus, H. G. Möller, and K. Kuschinsky. Psychopharmacology 90:40–48 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. H. M. Paalzow and L. K. Paalzow. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 88:27–35 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Carlsson. Chemical Tools in Chatecholamine Research II, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1975, pp. 219–225.

    Google Scholar 

  9. G. Di Chiara, G. U. Corsini, G. P. Mereu, A. Tissari, and G. L. Gessa. Adv. Biochem. Psychopharmacol. 19:275–292 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. W. Kebabian and D. B. Calne. Nature 277:93–96 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  11. I. Creese. Trends Neurosci. 5:40–43 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. H. M. Paalzow and L. K. Paalzow. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 38:28–34 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. C. Endozian. Nature 220:917–919 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  14. K. Krishnaswamy. Clin. Pharmacokin. 3:216–240 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  15. O. Walker, A. H. Dawodu, L. A. Salako, G. Alván, and A. O. K. Johnson. Br. J. Clin. Pharmac. 23:467–472 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  16. D. Jung, M. Nanavaty, and P. Prasad. Drug Metab. Dispos. 13:359–363 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Ashton, P. Bolme, and G. Zerihun. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 41:474–480 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. C. Wiggins, G. Fuller, and S. J. Enna. Life Sci. 35:2085–2094 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  19. C. Metzler and D. Weiner. Am. Stat. 1:52 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  20. H. G. Boxenbaum, S. Riegelman, and R. M. Elashoff. J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 2:123–148 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. Ashton, J. Gabrielsson, and J. Schikan. In preparation.

  22. R. V. Smith, A. E. Klein, R. E. Wilcox, W. H. Soine, W. H. Riffee, R. J. Baldessarini, and N. S. Kula. J. Pharm. Sci. 70:1144–1147(1981).

    Google Scholar 

  23. R. K. Jain, L. E. Gerlowski, J. M. Weissbrod, J. Wang, and N. Pierson, Jr. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 9:347–361 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  24. G. M. McKenzie and H. L. White. Biochem. Pharmacol. 22:2329–2336 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  25. P. N. Kaul, E. Brochmann-Hanssen, and E. Leong Way. J. Pharm. Sci. 50:840–842 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  26. P. N. Kaul, E. Brochmann-Hanssen, and E. Leong Way. J. Pharm. Sci. 50:248–251 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  27. G. A. O. Alleyne. Clin. Sci. 30:553–562 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  28. P. B. Beeson, W. McDermott, and J. B. Wyngaarden (eds.), Cecil Textbook of Medicine, W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  29. R. V. Smith, R. B. Velagapudi, A. M. McLean, and R. E. Wilcox. J. Med. Chem. 28:613–620 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  30. N. Buchanan. SA Mediese Tydskrift 52:733–737 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  31. J. M. H. Kremer, J. Wilting, and L. H. M. Janssen. Pharmacol. Rev. 40:1–40 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  32. J. P. Leahy, W. C. Stern, O. Resnick, and P. J. Morgaue. Dev. Psychobiol. 11:361–370 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  33. E. A. Keller, N. I. Munaro, and O. A. Orsingher. Science 215:1269–1270 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bredberg, E., Paalzow, L.K. Altered Pharmacokinetics and Dynamics of Apomorphine in the Malnourished Rat: Modeling of the Composed Relationship Between Concentration and Heart-Rate Response. Pharm Res 7, 318–324 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015850802006

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015850802006

Navigation