Abstract
This paper introduces a new general equilibrium model involving climate change. More precisely, we used the theory of stochastic differential equations driven by fractional Brownian motion and the theory of jump processes to predict the climate–economy relationship. Through real data, we verified the new model’s effectiveness and accessed its prediction capacity through various simulations. The model provided good simulations of CO2 concentrations and other emissions, temperature dynamics and GDP. Besides, we found that climate change hurts global GDP around 2045 ceteris paribus. It proves to be more suitable for predicting the process in which memory reveals to be a relevant fact. Some policy implications are proposed to mitigate the anticipated impacts of the climate on the economy.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs43546-023-00512-6/MediaObjects/43546_2023_512_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs43546-023-00512-6/MediaObjects/43546_2023_512_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs43546-023-00512-6/MediaObjects/43546_2023_512_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs43546-023-00512-6/MediaObjects/43546_2023_512_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs43546-023-00512-6/MediaObjects/43546_2023_512_Fig5_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs43546-023-00512-6/MediaObjects/43546_2023_512_Fig6_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs43546-023-00512-6/MediaObjects/43546_2023_512_Fig7_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs43546-023-00512-6/MediaObjects/43546_2023_512_Fig8_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs43546-023-00512-6/MediaObjects/43546_2023_512_Fig9_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs43546-023-00512-6/MediaObjects/43546_2023_512_Fig10_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and materials
Code availability
Code is available upon request.
Notes
Generalities on the theory of stochastic differential equations, fractional Brownian motion, and the theory of jump processes are provided in ESM Appendix.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
References
Ackerman F, Stanton E, Bueno R (2013) Epstein-zin utility in dice: is risk aversion irrelevant to climate policy? Environ Resour Econ 56:73–84
Arminen H, Menegaki AN (2019) Corruption, climate and the energy-environment-growth nexus. Energy Econ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.02.009
Athanasoglou S (2021) On the existence of efficient, individually rational, and fair environmental agreements. J Math Econ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmateco.2021.102560
Bassongui N, Nomo Alinga DN, Mignamissi D (2021) Threshold effects of energy mix on environmental quality. J Bioecon. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-020-09305-5
Cai Y, Lontzek T (2019) The social cost of carbon with economic and climate risks. J Political Econ 127:2684–2734
Carlino A, Giuliani M, Tavoni M, Castelletti A (2020) Multi-objective optimal control of a simple stochastic climate-economy model. IFAC-PapersOnLine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.786
Crost B, Traeger C (2014) Optimal CO2 mitigation under damage risk valuation. Nat Clim Change 4:631–636
Georgescu-Roegen N (1975) Dynamic models and economic growth. World Dev. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(75)90079-0
Gillingham K, Nordhaus W, Anthoff D, Blanford G, Bosetti V, Christensen P, McJeon H, Reilly J (2018) Modeling uncertainty in integrated assessment of climate change: a multimodel comparison. J Assoc Environ Resour Econ. https://doi.org/10.1086/698910
Hambel C, Kraft H, Schwartz E (2021) Optimal carbon abatement in a stochastic equilibrium model with climate change. Eur Econ Rev 132:1–25
Hayashi F (1982) Tobin’s marginal q and average q: a neoclassical interpretation. Econometrica 50:213–224
Hietaharju P, Ruusunen M, Leivisk K (2018) A dynamic model for indoor temperature prediction in buildings. Energies. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11061477
Hossain ME, Rej S, Saha SM, Onwe JC, Nwulu N, Bekun FV, Taha A (2022) Can energy efficiency help in achieving carbon-neutrality pledges? A develo** country perspective using dynamic ARDL simulations. Sustainability 14:7537. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137537
IPCC (2014) Fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Ivanovski K, Hailemariam A, Smyth R (2021) The effect of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on economic growth: non-parametric evidence. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124956
Jensen S, Traeger C (2014) Optimal climate change mitigation under long-term growth uncertainty: stochastic integrated assessment and analytic findings. Eur. Econ. Rev. 69:104–125
Kahouli B (2019) Does static and dynamic relationship between economic growth and energy consumption exist in OECD countries? Energy Rep. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2018.12.006
Kelly D, Kolstad C (1999) Bayesian learning, growth, and pollution. J Econ Dyn Control 23:491–518
Kolmogorov A (1940) The wiener spiral and some other interesting curves in a hilbert space. Acad URSS 26:115–118
Kuznets S (1955) Economic growth and income inequality. Am Econ Rev 45:1–28
Lanzi E, Dellink R, Chateau J (2018) The sectoral and regional economic consequences of outdoor air pollution to 2060. Energy Econ 71:89–113
Mandelbrot B, Ness JV (1968) Fractional brownian motions, fractional noise and applications. SIAM Rev 10:422–437
Maroufi N, Hajilary N (2022) The impacts of economic growth, foreign direct investments, and gas consumption on the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis CO2 emission in Iran. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:85350–85363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20794-x
Nordhaus W (1992) An optimal transition path for controlling greenhouse gases. SIAM J Control Optim 258:1315–1319
Nordhaus W (2008) A question of balance: weighing the options on global warming policies. Yale University Press, New Haven
Nordhaus W, Sztorc P (2013) DICE 2013R: introduction and users manual. Technical Report, 1. Yale University, pp 12
OECD (2015) The economic consequences of climate change. OECD Publ 42:669–685. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264235410-en
Pindyck R (2013) Climate change policy: what do the models tell us? J Econ Lit 51:860–872
Riti JS, Riti MKJ, Oji-Okoro I (2022) Renewable energy consumption in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA): implications on economic and environmental sustainability. Curr Res Environ Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2022.100129
Sakthivel R, Revathi P, Anthoni M (2012) Existence of pseudo almost automorphic mild solutions to stochastic fractional differential equations. Elsevier Nonlinear Anal 75:3339–3347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2011.12.028
Samour A, Chukwuma OJ, Inuwa N, Imran M (2022) Insurance market development, renewable energy, and environmental quality in the UAE: novel findings from a bootstrap ARDL test. Energy Environ. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X221122928
Tarasov VE, Tarasova VV (2019) Dynamic Keynesian model of economic growth with memory and lag. Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.3390/math7020178
Todisco E, Louveau J, Thobie C, Dechandol E, Hervé L, Durécu S, Titica M, Pruvost J (2022) A dynamic model for temperature prediction in a façade-integrated photobioreactor. Chem Eng Res Des. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2022.03.017
Wen Y, Onwe JC, Haseeb M, Saini S, Matuka A, Sahoo D (2022) Role of technological innovation, renewable and non-renewable energy, and economic growth on environmental quality. Evidence from African countries. Front Energy Res 10:958839. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2022.958839
Younsi M, Nafla A (2019) Financial stability, monetary policy, and economic growth: panel data evidence from developed and develo** countries. J Knowl Econ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-017-0453-5
Yu Y, Radulescu M, Ifelunini AI, Ogwu SO, Onwe JC, Jahanger A (2022) Achieving carbon neutrality pledge through clean energy transition: linking the role of green innovation and environmental policy in E7 countries. Energies 15:6456. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15176456
Funding
The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to study conception and design. Material preparation, data, and analysis were performed by KHB, ASA, and NB. ASA wrote the first draft of the manuscript and KHB and NB commented on previous versions. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Ethics approval
This is an observational study. The University of Abomey-Calavi Research Ethics Committee has confirmed that no ethical approval is required
Consent to participate
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Alinsato, A.S., Bete, K.H. & Bassongui, N. A climate–economy model in a stochastic differential equilibrium with fractional Brownian motions and Poisson jumps. SN Bus Econ 3, 139 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-023-00512-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-023-00512-6