Log in

A bibliometric analysis of how research collaboration influences Namibia’s research productivity and impact

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
SN Social Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

International Research Collaboration (IRC) has been increasingly gaining significance in the evaluation of science performance of individuals, institutions and countries over decades. However, minimal research has been conducted to analyse the impact of research collaboration in research productivity and impact. Hence, this paper aimed to assess the status of research collaboration influence on Namibia’s science productivity and impact. The study used the bibliometric analysis technique by analysing the citation of publications from Namibia, ranging from 2011 to 2020, using data from the Scopus and SciVAl analytical tools for further analysis. The findings revealed that Namibia has developed a dependence on international collaboration with over 75% of Namibia publications during the past ten years. The study also found a discrepancy between international cooperation, national and single authorship and across disciplines regarding the productivity and impact (average citation and field-weighted citation impact) of research favouring international collaborations. Moreover, the study discovered that Namibia contributes slightly (0.36%) to the global knowledge share, with less than 0.03% across different. The study has policy implications, recommending for a change of the national science policies to make provisions and encourage national and regional partnerships, as well as strengthening academic–industry collaboration to address local socio-economic developmental issues instead of chasing the international research developmental agenda.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

References

  • Abbasi A, Jaafari A (2013) Research impact and scholars’ geographical diversity. J Informet 7(3):683–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abramo G, D’Angelo CA (2015) The relationship between the number of authors of a publication, its citations and the impact factor of the publishing journal: evidence from Italy. J Informet 9(4):746–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, J. (2013). The fourth age of research. Nature 497(7451), 557–560

  • Adams J (2017) International research collaboration after the UK leaves the European Union. April. https://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/policy-and-analysis/reports/Documents/2017/international-collaboration-uk-post-exit.pdf

  • Adams J, Gurney K, Hook D, Leydesdorff L (2014) International collaboration clusters in Africa. Scientometrics 98(1):547–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams J, Pendelbury D, Potter R (2022) Making it count: research credit management in a collaborative world. https://urldefense.com/v3/; https://clarivate.com/wp-content/uploads/dlm_uploads/2022/01/ISI_GRR_Making_It_Count_2022.pdf

  • African Union Commission (2014) Statute of the African Observatory in Science Technology and Innovation (AOSTI). https://akb.au.int/handle/AKB/25461

  • Akinremi TO (2011) Research collaboration with low resource countries: overcoming the challenges. Infect Agents Cancer 6(SUPPL. 2):S3. https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-9378-6-S2-S3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anuradha K, Urs S (2007) Bibliometric indicators of Indian research collaboration patterns: a correspondence analysis. Scientometrics 71(2):179–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atieno AV, Onyancha OB, Kwanya T (2021) Trends, patterns and determinants of research productivity at the Technical University of Kenya. Inf Dev 38(1):97–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666920983400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avkiran NK (2012) Does collaboration in finance research in the 21st century produce articles of higher impact?. In: 25th Australasian Finance and Banking Conference

  • Baas J, Schotten M, Plume A, Côté G, Karimi R (2020) Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quant Sci Stud 1(1):377–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bangani S, Onyancha OB (2020) Evaluation of the national research foundation-rated researchers’ output at a South African university. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication.

  • Barrios C, Flores E, Martínez MÁ, Ruiz-Martínez M (2019) Is there convergence in international research collaboration? An exploration at the country level in the basic and applied science fields. Scientometrics 120(2):631–659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03133-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boshoff N (2009) Neo-colonialism and research collaboration in Central Africa. Scientometrics 81(2):413–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boshoff N (2010) South-South research collaboration of countries in the Southern African Development Community (SADC). Scientometrics 84(2):481–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceballos HG, Fangmeyer J Jr, Galeano N, Juarez E, Cantu-Ortiz FJ (2017) Impelling research productivity and impact through collaboration: a scientometric case study of knowledge management. Knowl Manag Res Pract 15(3):346–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen K, Zhang Y, Fu X (2019) International research collaboration: an emerging domain of innovation studies? Res Policy 48(1):149–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cloete N, Bunting I, Maassen P (2015) Research universities in Africa: an empirical overview of eight flagship universities. Knowl Prod Contradictory Funct Afr Higher Educ 1:18–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Coccia M, Bozeman B (2016) Allometric models to measure and analyze the evolution of international research collaboration. Scientometrics 108(3):1065–1084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daim TU, Rueda G, Martin H, Gerdsri P (2006) Forecasting emerging technologies: use of bibliometrics and patent analysis. Technol Forecast Soc Change 73(8):981–1012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dell S (2017) Africa: International Collaboration in African Research—who wins? In: Understanding Higher Education Internationalization. SensePublishers, pp 315–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-161-2_68

  • Didegah F, Thelwall M (2013) Which factors help authors produce the highest impact research? Collaboration, journal and document properties. J Informet 7(4):861–873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodsworth S, Cheeseman N (2018) The potential and pitfalls of collaborating with development organizations and policy makers in Africa. Afr Aff 117(466):130–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsevier (2022) Scopus: your brilliance connected. https://www.elsevier.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/114533/Scopus-fact-sheet-2022_WEB.pdf

  • Elzinga A (2012) Features of the current science policy regime: viewed in historical perspective. Sci Public Policy 39(4):416–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ettarh R (2016) Patterns of international collaboration in cardiovascular research in sub-Saharan Africa. In: Cardiovascular Journal of Africa, vol. 27, Issue 3. Clinics Cardive Publishing (PTY) Ltd., pp. 194–200. https://doi.org/10.5830/CVJA-2015-082

  • Frame JD, Carpenter MP (1979) International research collaboration. Soc Stud Sci 9(4):481–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frenken K, Hölzl W, De Vor F (2005) The citation impact of research collaborations: the case of European biotechnology and applied microbiology (1988–2002). J Eng Tech Manag 22(1–2):9–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganzi A, Sugimoto CR, Didegah F (2012) Map** world scientificcollaboration: authors, institutions, and countries. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 63(2):323–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel W, Schubert A (2001) Double effort= double impact? A critical view at international co-authorship in chemistry. Scientometrics 50(2):199–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Alcaide G (2014) Scientometric portrait of biochemist Santiago Grisolía: publication productivity, collaboration patterns, and citation analysis. Res Eval 23(2):150–165. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvu003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayati Z, Didegah F (2010) International scientific collaboration among Iranian researchers during 1998–2007. Library Hi Tech 28(3):433–446. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831011076675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeong S, Choi JY, Kim J (2011) The determinants of research collaboration modes: exploring the effects of research and researcher characteristics on co-authorship. Scientometrics 89(3):967–983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalusopa T, Zibani P, Kanguti R, Leonard A (2020) Research productivity, visibility, and impact at the University of Namibia: building a framework for open access and research data management. In: Handbook of Research on Connecting Research Methods for Information Science Research. IGI Global, pp 489–516. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1471-9.ch025

  • Kamalski J, Plume A (2013) Comparative benchmarking of european and us research collaboration and researchers mobility: a report prepared in collaboration between Science Europe and Elsevier's SciVal Analytics. Elsevier.

  • Katz J, Hicks D (1997) How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model. Scientometrics 40(3):541–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khaemba W (2018) Science granting councils initiatives in Sub-Saharan Africa strengthening partnership among private sector: a baseline asessment of public-private partnership in Namibia

  • Khor KA, Yu LG (2016) Influence of international co-authorship on the research citation impact of young universities. Scientometrics 107(3):1095–1110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwiek M (2018) International research collaboration and international research orientation: comparative findings about european academics. J Stud Int Educ 22(2):136–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315317747084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwiek M (2020a) Internationalists and locals: international research collaboration in a resource-poor system. Scientometrics 124(1):57–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwiek M (2020b) What large-scale publication and citation data tell us about international research collaboration in Europe: changing national patterns in global contexts. Stud High Educ 46(12):2629–2649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leahey E (2016) From sole investigator to team scientist: trends in the practice and study of research collaboration. Ann Rev Sociol 42:81–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Bozeman B (2005) The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Soc Stud Sci 35(5):673–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao CH, Yen HR (2012) Quantifying the degree of research collaboration: a comparative study of collaborative measures. J Informet 6(1):27–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maluleka JR, Onyancha OB (2016) Research collaboration among Library and Information Science schools in South Africa (1991–2012): an informetrics study. Mousaion 34(3):36–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mêgnigbêto E (2013) International collaboration in scientific publishing: the case of West Africa (2001–2010). Scientometrics 96(3):761–783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-0963-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Namhila EN (2014) Mentoring librarians for scholarly publishing. IFLA J 40(2):120–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Research Science & Technology (2014) The National programme on research, science, technology and innovation (NPRSTI) 2014/15 to 2016/17

  • National Commussion on Research Science & Technology, & NCRST (2016) Namibia’s national system of innovation: a review of policy regimes and the institutional landscape

  • National Council For Higher Educational (2019) Namibia Higher Education Statistical Yearbook. http://www.nche.org.na/sites/default/files/documents/2019_nhesy.pdf

  • Ni P, An X (2018) Relationship between international collaboration papers and their citations from an economic perspective. Scientometrics 116(2):863–877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2784-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ofoegbu C, New M, Nyamwanza AM, Spear D (2020) Understanding the current state of collaboration in the production and dissemination of adaptation knowledge in Namibia. Environ Dev Sustain 22(2):1017–1037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0231-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onyancha OB (2016) Open research data in Sub-Saharan Africa: a bibliometric study using the Data Citation Index. Publ Res Quart 32(3):227–246

  • Onyancha OB (2018) Map** collaboration and impact of library and information science research in sub-Saharan Africa, from 1995 to 2016. Libr Manag 39(6–7):349–363. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-06-2017-0059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onyancha OB (2020a) Regional and international research collaboration and citation impact in selected sub-Saharan African countries in the period 2000 to 2019. Glob Knowl Mem Commun 70(6–7):577–594. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-04-2020-0039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onyancha OB (2020b) Research partnerships that count in Sub Saharan Africa’s research output and impact: a bibliometrics study of selected countries, 2000–2019. Afr J Lib Arch Inf Sci 30(2)

  • Ouahi JE (2017) Research and innovation in Africa : a briefing paper. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjr-sTUi_b5AhUWZsAKHV9_BSoQFnoECAQQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.jamaleo.com%2Fresearch%2Fresearch-and-innovation-in-africa-a-briefing-paper%2F&usg=AOvVaw1IRp2KL29eldz3w6k56dfC

  • Owusu-Nimo F, Boshoff N (2017) Research collaboration in Ghana: patterns, motives and roles. Scientometrics 110(3):1099–1121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2221-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patra SK, Muchie M (2017) Engineering research profile of countries in the African Union. Afr J Sci Technol Innov Dev 9(4):449–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2017.1341732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patra SK, Muchie M (2021) Scientific and technical productivity of African countries: what scopus and WIPO patentscope data tell us? J Scientometric Res 10(3):355–365. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.10.3.53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pouris A (2012) Scientometric research in South Africa and successful policy instruments. Scientometrics 91(2):317–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pouris A, Ho YS (2014) Research emphasis and collaboration in Africa. Scientometrics 98(3):2169–2184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1156-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puuska H-M, Muhonen R, Leino Y, Puuska H-M, Muhonen ÁR, Leino ÁY (2014) International and domestic co-publishing and their citation impact in different disciplines. Scientometrics 98:823–839. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1181-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quan W, Mongeon P, Sainte-Marie M, Zhao R, Larivière V (2019) On the development of China’s leadership in international collaborations. Scientometrics 120(2):707–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabah F, Hassan SU, Muazzam A, Iqbal S, Soroya SH, Sarwar R (2018) Scientific collaboration networks in Pakistan and their impact on institutional research performance: a case study based on Scopus publications. Library Hi Tech

  • Scarazzati S, Scientometrics LW (2019) undefined. (n.d.) The effect of collaborations on scientific research output: the case of nanoscience in Chinese regions. Springer. Accessed 2 Nov 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03220-x

  • Scarazzati S, Wang L (2019) The effect of collaborations on scientific research output: the case of nanoscience in Chinese regions. Scientometrics 121(2):839–868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03220-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sifani JM (2019) Innovation systems for national economic competitiveness innovation: a comperative analysis of Botswana and Namibia. University of Namibia. http://repository.unam.edu.na/handle/11070/2596

  • Sooryamoorthy R (2018) The production of science in Africa: an analysis of publications in the science disciplines, 2000–2015. Scientometrics 115(1):317–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2675-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sud P, Thelwall M (2016) Not all international collaboration is beneficial: the M endeley readership and citation impact of biochemical research collaboration. J Am Soc Inf Sci 67(8):1849–1857

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall M, Maflahi N (2019) Academic collaboration rates and citation associations vary substantially between countries and fields. J Am Soc Inf Sci 71(8):968–978

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall M, Sud P (2016) National, disciplinary and temporal variations in the extent to which articles with more authors have more impact: evidence from a geometric field normalised citation indicator. J Informet 10(1):48–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tijssen RW, Van Leeuwen TN (2007) Research cooperation within Europe: bibliometric views of geographical trends and integration processes. In: Proceeding trends and integration, proceedings of the ISSI, pp 744–758

  • Toivanen H, Ponomariov B (2011) African regional innovation systems: bibliometric analysis of research collaboration patterns 2005–2009. Scientometrics 88(2):471–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • University of Namibia (2016) Annual report. https://www.unam.edu.na/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/UNAM-Annual-Report-2016-.pdf

  • Van Eck NJ, Waltman L (2019) Accuracy of citation data in Web of Science and Scopus. In: ISSI 2017—16th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, Conference Proceedings, pp 1087–1092. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1906.07011

  • Van Rijnsoever FJ, Hessels LK (2011) Factors associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary research collaboration. Res Policy 40(3):463–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner CS, Whetsell TA, Leydesdorff L (2017) Growth of international collaboration in science: revisiting six specialties. Scientometrics 110(3):1633–1652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner CS, Whetsell TA, Mukherjee S (2019) International research collaboration: novelty, conventionality, and atypicality in knowledge recombination. Res Policy 48(5):1260–1270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg AM (1967) Reflections on big science. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • West JD, Jensen MC, Dandrea RJ, Gordon GJ, Bergstrom CT (2013) Author-level Eigenfactor metrics: evaluating the influence of authors, institutions, and countries within the social science research network community. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 64(4):787–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wuchty S, Jones BF, Uzzi B (2007) The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 316(5827):1036–1039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ynalvez MA, Shrum WM (2011) Professional networks, scientific collaboration, and publication productivity in resource-constrained research institutions in a develo** country. Res Policy 40(2):204–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng XHT, Duch J, Sales-Pardo M, Moreira JA, Radicchi F, Ribeiro HV, Amaral LAN (2016) Differences in collaboration patterns across discipline, career stage, and gender. PLoS Biol 14(11):e1002573

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Access to the research data used in this study has been provided by the University of Namibia through its annual subscription to SciVal analytical tool and Scopus indexing databases of Elsevier. In addition, a scientometrics course, funded and provided by the Leiden University, helped to shape this article into a publishable standard.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AL contributed to the write up of all the sections, editing and addressed reviewers’ comments of the study. Ms MMS contributed to the write up of the analysis and discussion of the study. Dr NH partly contributed to the write up of the conclusive remarks.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Leonard.

Ethics declarations

Competing interest

All authors declare that they have no involvement with any financial or non-financial interest in the subject matters or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Leonard, A., Hamutumwa, N. & Mabuku, M. A bibliometric analysis of how research collaboration influences Namibia’s research productivity and impact. SN Soc Sci 2, 225 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-022-00528-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-022-00528-z

Keywords

Navigation