Log in

Space-Time Cube for Visual Queries over Metadata of Heterogeneous Geodata

Ein Raum-Zeit-Würfel für visuelle Abfragen zu Metadaten heterogener Geodatensätze

  • Published:
KN - Journal of Cartography and Geographic Information Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nowadays, huge amounts of geodata are increasingly made accessible on geodata portals. Typically, these data portals provide extensive metadata with various attributes, such as topic, size, and quality, that describe basic information about the datasets. However, at present, there is still insufficient work using visual interfaces to support the intuitive understanding of the overall distribution of metadata and make efficient decisions on which datasets they want. In this study, we designed a visual interface to display the metadata based on a space-time cube (STC) visualization, through which users could gain not only an overview of the metadata, but also detailed information about individual metadata attributes. We evaluated the design with 32 participants who were asked to perform five predefined benchmark tasks. The evaluation results show that most users can successfully finish tasks in finding specific datasets. This demonstrates that the space-time cube can provide a good overview and is visually attractive to potential users of the data portal. Nevertheless, the design has some limitations, e.g., the selection of color scheme and 3D symbol shape, which we need to improve in our future work. Besides, STC is rather new to most participants, and some of them were not used to this type of visualization. We believe that the space-time cube could be deployed as a supplementary method for displaying metadata in open data portals if sufficient user guidance is provided.

Zusammenfassung

Heutzutage werden große Mengen an Geodaten zunehmend auf Geodatenportalen zugänglich gemacht. In der Regel bieten diese Datenportale umfangreiche Metadaten mit verschiedenen Attributen wie Thema, Größe und Qualität, die grundlegende Informationen über die Datensätze beschreiben. Derzeit gibt es jedoch noch keine ausreichenden Arbeiten, die visuelle Schnittstellen verwenden, um das intuitive Verständnis der Gesamtverteilung der Metadaten zu unterstützen und effiziente Entscheidungen darüber zu treffen, welche Datensätze sie wünschen. In dieser Studie haben wir eine visuelle Schnittstelle zur Darstellung der Metadaten auf der Grundlage eines Raum-Zeit-Würfels (STC) entwickelt, über die die Benutzer nicht nur einen Überblick über die Metadaten, sondern auch detaillierte Informationen über einzelne Metadatenattribute erhalten können. Wir haben das Design mit 32 Teilnehmern evaluiert, die fünf vordefinierte Benchmark-Aufgaben durchführen sollten. Die Evaluierungsergebnisse zeigen, dass die meisten Benutzer die Aufgaben zum Auffinden bestimmter Datensätze erfolgreich lösen können. Dies zeigt, dass der Raum-Zeit-Würfel einen guten Überblick bieten kann und für potenzielle Nutzer des Datenportals visuell attraktiv ist. Dennoch weist das Design einige Einschränkungen auf, z.B. bei der Auswahl des Farbschemas und der 3D-Symbolform, die wir in unserer zukünftigen Arbeit verbessern müssen. Außerdem ist STC für die meisten Teilnehmer ziemlich neu, und einige von ihnen waren nicht an diese Art der Visualisierung gewöhnt. Wir glauben, dass der Raum-Zeit-Würfel als zusätzliche Methode zur Darstellung von Metadaten in offenen Datenportalen eingesetzt werden könnte, wenn eine ausreichende Benutzerführung gegeben ist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://dl.acm.org/.

  2. http://tj.jiangsu.gov.cn/col/col4009/index.html.

  3. https://earthdata.nasa.gov/.

  4. https://www.webmap.cn/main.do?method=index.

  5. https://www.qualtrics.com/.

References

  • Aditya T, Kraak MJ (2007) A search interface for an SDI: implementation and evaluation of metadata visualization strategies. Trans GIS 11:413–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9671.2007.01053.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrienko G, Andrienko N, Schumann H, Tominski C (2014) Visualization of trajectory attributes in space-time cube and trajectory wall. In: Buchroithner M, Prechtel N, Burghardt D (eds) Cartography from pole to pole: selected contributions to the XXVIth international conference of the ICA, Dresden 2013. Springer, Berlin, pp 157–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32618-9_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Archambault D, Purchase H, Pinaud B (2011) Animation, small multiples, and the effect of mental map preservation in dynamic graphs. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graphics 17:539–552. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2010.78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bach B, Pietriga E, Fekete JD (2014) Visualizing dynamic networks with matrix cubes. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA; CHI ’14, pp 877–886. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557010

  • Bogucka EP, Jahnke M (2018) Feasibility of the space-time cube in temporal cultural landscape visualization. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi7060209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai L, Zhu Y (2015) The challenges of data quality and data quality assessment in the big data era. Data Sci J 14:2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpendale MST, Cowperthwaite DJ, Tigges M, Fall AJ, Fracchia FD (1999) Tardis: a visual exploration environment for landscape dynamics. In: Erbacher RF, Chen PC, Wittenbrink CM (eds) Visual data exploration and analysis VI. International society for optics and photonics, SPIE, Vol. 3643, pp 110 – 119. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.342825

  • Catarci T, Costabile MF, Levialdi S, Batini C (1997) Visual query systems for databases: a survey. J Visual Languag Comput 8:215–260. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvlc.1997.0037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Yu B, Song W, Liu H, Wu Q, Shi K, Wu J (2017) A new approach for detecting urban centers and their spatial structure with nighttime light remote sensing. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 55:6305–6319. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2017.2725917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cybulski P, Horbiński T (2020) User experience in using graphical user interfaces of web maps. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9070412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies T (2010) Open data, democracy and public sector reform. In: A look at open government data use from data. gov. UK, pp 1–47

  • Ding L, **ao G, Calvanese D, Meng L (2020) A framework uniting ontology-based geodata integration and geo-visual analytics. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9080474

  • Eyl M (1995) The harmony information landscape: interactive, three-dimensional navigation through an information space. Graz University of Technology, Austria

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Geographic Data Committee. FGDC-STD-001-1998. Content standard for digital geospatial metadata (revised June 1998). In: Federal Geographic Data Committee. Washington, D.C. Available at: https://www.fgdc.gov/metadata/csdgm/

  • Gatalsky P, Andrienko N, Andrienko G (2004) Interactive analysis of event data using space-time cube. In: Proceedings. Eighth International Conference on Information Visualisation, 2004. IV 2004, pp 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1109/IV.2004.1320137

  • George G, Haas MR, Pentland A (2014) Big data and management. Acad Manag J 57:321–326. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.4002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild MF (2007a) Beyond metadata: towards user-centric description of data quality. In: Proceedings, Spatial Data Quality 2007 International Symposium on Spatial Data Quality. Citeseer, pp 13–15

  • Goodchild MF (2007b) Beyond metadata: Towards user-centric description of data quality. In: Proceedings, spatial data quality 2007 international symposium on spatial data quality. Citeseer, pp 13–15

  • Goodchild MF (2007) Citizens as voluntary sensors: spatial data infrastructure in the world of Web 2.0. Int J Spatial Data Infrastruct Res 2:24–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Görlitz O, Staab S (2011) Federated data management and query optimization for linked open data. In: Vakali A, Jain LC (eds) New Directions in Web data management 1. Springer, Berlin, pp 109–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17551-0_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin AL, MacEachren AM, Hardisty F, Steiner E, Li B (2006) A comparison of animated maps with static small-multiple maps for visually identifying space-time clusters. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 96:740–753. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00514.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang B, Ren Z (2019) Geographic space as a living structure for predicting human activities using big data. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 33:764–779. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2018.1427754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim TJ (1999) Metadata for geo-spatial data sharing: a comparative analysis. Ann Reg Sci 33:171–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirstein F, Dittwald B, Dutkowski S, Glikman Y, Schimmler S, Hauswirth M (2019) Linked data in the european data portal: a comprehensive platform for applying dcat-ap. In: International Conference on Electronic Government. Springer, pp 192–204

  • Kostovski M, Jovanovik M, Trajanov D (2012) Open data portal based on semantic web technologies. In: Proceedings of the 7th South East European Doctoral Student Conference, pp 1–13

  • Kraak M, Ormeling F (2010) Cartography: visualization of spatial data, 3rd edn. Guilford Publications, Guilford

    Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Chen S, Chen W, Andrienko G, Andrienko N (2020) Semantics-space-time cube: a conceptual framework for systematic analysis of texts in space and time. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graphics 26:1789–1806. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2018.2882449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longley PA, Goodchild MF, Maguire DJ, Rhind DW (2005) Geographic information systems and science. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Maso J, Zabala A, Serral I, Pons X (2019) A portal offering standard visualization and analysis on top of an open data cube for sub-national regions: the catalan data cube example. Data. https://doi.org/10.3390/data4030096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neutens T, Witlox F, de Weghe NV, Maeyer PD (2007) Human interaction spaces under uncertainty. Transp Res Rec 2021:28–35. https://doi.org/10.3141/2021-04

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pichat E, Saker D (1995) An automatic and cooperative visual database interface. VDB, pp 375–393

  • Ramalho LdF, Segundo WRdC (2020) R-Shiny as an interface for data visualization and data analysis on the Brazilian Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (BDTD). Publications. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications8020024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivadeneira W, Bederson BB (2003) A study of search result clustering interfaces: comparing textual and zoomable user interfaces. Studies 21:3

    Google Scholar 

  • Soylu A, Giese M, Jimenez-Ruiz E, Kharlamov E, Zheleznyakov D, Horrocks I (2017) Ontology-based end-user visual query formulation: Why, what, who, how, and which? Univ Access Inf Soc 16:435–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stadler C, Martin M, Auer S (2014) Exploring the web of spatial data with facete. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web; Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA; WWW ’14 Companion, pp 175–178. https://doi.org/10.1145/2567948.2577022

  • Torsten H (1970) What about people in regional science? Region Sci Assoc 24:6–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullah R, Kraak MJ (2015) An alternative method to constructing time cartograms for the visual representation of scheduled movement data. J Maps 11:674–687. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2014.935502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valsecchi F, Ronchetti M (2014) Spacetime: a two dimensions search and visualisation engine based on linked data. In: Conference on Advances in Semantic Processing (SEMAPRO)

  • Veregin H (1999) Data quality parameters. Geograph Inf Syst 1:177–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Vetrò A, Canova L, Torchiano M, Minotas CO, Iemma R, Morando F (2016) Open data quality measurement framework: definition and application to Open Government Data. Gov Inf Q 33:325–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu R, Lin D, Jendryke M, Zuo C, Ding L, Meng L (2019) Geo-tagged social media data-based analytical approach for perceiving impacts of social events. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8010015

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linfang Ding.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zuo, C., Gao, M., Ding, L. et al. Space-Time Cube for Visual Queries over Metadata of Heterogeneous Geodata. KN J. Cartogr. Geogr. Inf. 72, 29–39 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42489-022-00096-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42489-022-00096-5

Keywords

Navigation