Log in

Investigation of Buckling Knockdown Factors for Pressurized Metallic Cylinders Using Various Numerical Modeling Techniques of Initial Imperfections

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nonlinear postbuckling analyses are conducted to investigate the buckling KnockDown Factors (KDF) for pressurized metallic cylinders. The nonlinear analysis code, ABAQUS, is used to the postbuckling analyses. Various numerical modeling techniques are used to represent the initial imperfections of a cylinder. Measured Geometric Imperfection (MGI) and Single (or Multiple) Perturbation Load Approaches (SPLA or MPLA) are considered to model the geometric initial imperfection modeling techniques, and Single Boundary Perturbation Approach (SBPA) is used to represent the boundary imperfection modeling technique. When the internal pressures of 0 and 40 kPa, the SPLA can provide less conservative KDFs. However, the robust KDFs for the cylinder subjected to an internal pressure of 100 kPa are derived using the SBPA. These results show that the initial imperfection modeling must be appropriately selected considering the internal pressure levels of the thin-walled cylinder.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The numerical data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

References

  1. Peterson JP, Seide P, Weingarten VI (1968) Buckling of thin-walled circular cylinders. NASA SP-8007

  2. Haynie W, Hilburger MW, Bogge M, Maspoli M, Kriegesmann B (2012) Validation of lower-bound estimates for compression-loaded cylindrical shells. In: 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference 20th AIAA/ASME/AHS adaptive structures conference

  3. Hilburger MW (2012) Develo** the next generation shell buckling design factors and technologies. In 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference 20th AIAA/ASME/AHS adaptive structures conference

  4. Degenhardt R, Castro SG, Arbelo MA, Zimmerman R, Khakimova R, Kling A (2014) Future structural stability design for composite space and airframe structures. Thin-Walled Struct 81:29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2014.02.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sim CH, Park JS, Kim HI, Lee YL, Lee K (2018) Postbuckling analyses and derivations of knockdown factors for hybrid-grid stiffened cylinders. Aerosp Sci Technol 82:20–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2018.08.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Verduyn WD, Elishakoff I (1982) A testing machine for statistical analysis of small imperfect shells: part I. Delft University of Technology, Department of Aerospace Engineering, Report LR-357

  7. Wagner HNR, Hühne C (2018) Robust knockdown factors for the design of cylindrical shells under axial compression: potentials, practical application and reliability analysis. Int J Mech Sci 135:410–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.11.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wagner HNR, Hühne C, Rohwer K, Niemann S, Wiedemann M (2017) Stimulating the realistic worst case buckling scenario of axially compressed unstiffened cylindrical composite shells. Compos Struct 160:1095–1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.10.108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhao H, Lan X, Liu L, Liu Y, Leng J (2023) Numerical prediction and experimental analysis of the buckling loads of SMPC cylindrical shells under axial compression. Thin-Walled Struct 183:110340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2022.110340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sim CH, Kim HI, Lee YL, Park JS, Lee K (2018) Derivations of knockdown factors for cylindrical structures considering different initial imperfection models and thickness ratios. Int J Aeronaut Space Sci 19:626–635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-018-0069-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hao P, Wang B, Li G, Meng Z, Tian K, Zeng D, Tang X (2014) Worst multiple perturbation load approach of stiffened shells with and without cutouts for improved knockdown factors. Thin-Walled Struct 82:321–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2014.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tian K, Wang B, Hao P, Waas AM (2017) A high-fidelity approximate model for determining lower-bound buckling loads for stiffened shells. Int J Solids Struct 148:14–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.10.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim DY, Sim CH, Park JS, Yoo JT, Yoon YH, Lee K (2021) Buckling knockdown factors of composite cylinders under both compression and internal pressure. Aerospace 8(11):346. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace8110346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang B, Du K, Hao P, Zhou C, Tian K, Xu S, Ma Y, Zhang X (2016) Numerically and experimentally predicted knockdown factors for stiffened shells under axial compression. Thin-Walled Struct 109:13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2016.09.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hühne C, Rolfes R, Breitbach E, Teßmer J (2008) Robust design of composite cylindrical shells under axial compression—simulation and validation. Thin-Walled Struct 46(7–9):947–962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2008.01.043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wagner HNR, Hühne C, Niemann S (2017) Robust knockdown factors for the design of axially loaded cylindrical and conical composite shells—development and validation. Compos Struct 173:281–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.02.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hilburger MW (2020) Buckling of thin-walled circular cylinders. NASA/SP-8007-2020/REV 2

  18. Hilburger MW, Lovejoy AE, Thornburgh R, Rankin C (2012) Design and analysis of subscale and full-scale buckling-critical cylinders for launch vehicle technology development. In: 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference 20th AIAA/ASME/AHS adaptive structures conference 14th AIAA

  19. Hilburger MW, Haynie W, Lovejoy AE, Roberts M, Norris J, Waters W, Herring H (2012) Sub-scale and full-scale testing of buckling-critical launch vehicle shell structures. In: 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference 20th AIAA/ASME/AHS adaptive structures conference 14th AIAA

  20. Jeon MH, Cho HJ, Sim CH, Kim YJ, Lee MY, Kim IG, Park JS (2023) Experimental and numerical approach for predicting global buckling load of pressurized unstiffened cylindrical shells using vibration correlation technique. Compos Struct 350:116460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sim CH, Kim DY, Park JS, Yoo JT, Yoon YH, Lee K (2023) Derivation of buckling knockdown factors for pressurized orthogrid-stiffened cylinders of launch vehicle structures. Int J Aeronaut Space Sci 2023:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-023-00621-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Singer J, Abramovich H (1995) The development of shell imperfection measurement techniques. Thin-Walled Struct 23:379–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-8231(95)94361-V

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Teng JG, Rotter JM (2004) Buckling of thin metal shells. CRC Press, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Dassault Systémes Simulia Corp (2013) Abaqus users, Ver. 6.13–2. Dassault Systémes Simulia Corp., Providence

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ma H, Jiao P, Li H, Cheng Z, Chen Z (2023) Buckling analyses of thin-walled cylindrical shells subjected to multi-region localized axial compression: experimental and numerical study. Thin-Walled Struct 183:110330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2022.110330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Friedrich L, Schröder KU (2016) Discrepancy between boundary conditions and load introduction of full-scale built-in and sub-scale experimental shell structures of space launcher vehicles. Thin-Walled Struct 98:403–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2015.10.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yamada S, Croll JGA (1999) Contributions to understanding the behavior of axially compressed cylinders. J Appl Mech 66(2):299–309. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.279104

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by research on the Korea Space Launch Vehicle (KSLV-II) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT, Korea). The work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (NRF-2022M1A3B8076744). The work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (NRF-2022M1A3B8076744).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jae-Sang Park.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sim, CH., Kim, DY., Jeon, MH. et al. Investigation of Buckling Knockdown Factors for Pressurized Metallic Cylinders Using Various Numerical Modeling Techniques of Initial Imperfections. Int. J. Aeronaut. Space Sci. 25, 698–715 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-023-00667-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-023-00667-4

Keywords

Navigation