Abstract
Temperature control is the key of Ruhrstahl-Heraeus (RH) process in steelmaking plant. The accuracy of RH control model greatly affects the molten steel temperature fluctuation. To obtain RH control model with higher accuracy, an improved case-based reasoning (CBR) model based on attribute weights optimized by genetic algorithm (GA) was proposed. The fitness function in GA was determined according to the prediction accuracy of end temperature of molten steel in RH; then, GA is used to optimize all the attribute weights based on known case base. An improved CBR model that contains the optimized attribute weights was applied to predict end temperature of molten steel in RH, and the prediction accuracy was calculated. Four methods, CBR based on attribute weights optimized by GA (CBR–GA), ordinary CBR, back propagation neural network (BPNN) and multiple linear regression (MLR) method were employed for comparison. The results show that in the error range of [− 3 °C, 3 °C], [− 5 °C, 5 °C], [− 7 °C, 7 °C] and [− 10 °C, 10 °C], the prediction accuracy of CBR–GA was improved by 19.99%, 28.19%, 27.11% and 16.3%, respectively, than that of MLR. Compared with BPNN, the prediction accuracy increased by 3.22%, 7.44%, 5.29% and 2.40%, respectively. Compared with ordinary CBR, the accuracy increased by 5.43%, 5.80%, 4.66% and 2.27%, respectively.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42243-019-00264-4/MediaObjects/42243_2019_264_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42243-019-00264-4/MediaObjects/42243_2019_264_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42243-019-00264-4/MediaObjects/42243_2019_264_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42243-019-00264-4/MediaObjects/42243_2019_264_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42243-019-00264-4/MediaObjects/42243_2019_264_Fig5_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42243-019-00264-4/MediaObjects/42243_2019_264_Fig6_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42243-019-00264-4/MediaObjects/42243_2019_264_Fig7_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42243-019-00264-4/MediaObjects/42243_2019_264_Fig8_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. Tripathi, J.K. Saha, J.B. Singh, S.K. Ajmani, in: L. Nastac, L. Zhang, B.G. Thomas, A. Sabau, N. El-Kaddah, A.C. Powell, H. Combeau (Eds.), CFD modeling and simulation in materials processing. The Minerals, Metals, & Materials Society, 2012, pp. 295–302.
T. **a, Z. He, Adv. Mater. Res. 712–715 (2013) 22–25.
X. Wang, P. Yuan, Z. Mao, M. You, Knowl. Based Syst. 101 (2016) 48–59.
X. Wang, M. You, Z. Mao, P. Yuan, Adv. Eng. Inform. 30 (2016) 368–375.
T. Okura, I. Ahmad, M. Kano, S. Hasebe, H. Kitada, N. Murata, ISIJ Int. 53 (2013) 76–80.
H. Wang, A. Xu, L. Ai, N. Tian, X. Du, ISIJ Int. 52 (2012) 80-86.
W. Lv, Z. Mao, P. Yuan, Steel Res. Int. 83 (2012) 288–296.
K. Feng, D. He, A. Xu, H. Wang, Steel Res. Int. 87 (2016) 79–86.
I. Ahmad, M. Kano, S. Hasebe, H. Kitada, N. Murata, J. Process Control 24 (2014) 375–382.
H.X. Tian, Z.Z. Mao, IEEE Trans. Aut. Sci. Eng. 7 (2010) 73–80.
Q. Li, G. Cao, J. Li, N. Wang, Appl. Mech. Mater. 48-49 (2011) 853-857.
H.B. Wang, L.X. Ai, A.J. Xu, N.Y. Tian, Z.C. Hou, Z.W. Zhou, J. Univ. Sci. Technol. Bei**g 34 (2012) 264–269.
F. He, A. Xu, H. Wang, D. He, N. Tian, Steel Res. Int. 83 (2012) 1079–1086.
K. Feng, H.B. Wang, A.J. Xu, D.F. He, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater. 20 (2013) 1148–1154.
S.W. Wu, X.G. Zhou, J.K. Ren, G.M. Cao, Z.Y. Liu, N.A. Shi, J. Iron Steel Res. Int. 25 (2018) 700–705.
P.M. Ajith, T.M. Afsal Husain, P. Sathiya, S. Aravindan, J. Iron Steel Res. Int. 22 (2015) 954–960.
S. Pal, C. Halder, Steel Res. Int. 88 (2017) 1600193.
L. Li, Q. Tang, P. Zheng, L. Zhang, C.A. Floudas, in: E. Qi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th international Asia conference on industrial engineering and management innovation, Atlantis Press, Paris, France, 2016, pp. 399–410.
S. Lin, F. Luan, Z. Han, X. Lü, X. Zhou, W. Liu, Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 22 (2014) 742–747.
K. Worapradya, P. Thanakijkasem, S. Afr. J. Ind. Eng. 25 (2014) 209–221.
K. Feng, D.F. He, A.J. Xu, H.B. Wang, J. Iron Steel Res. Int. 22 (2015) 68–74.
Acknowledgements
This work was financially supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2016YFB0601301), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51574032) and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. FRF-TP-16-081A1).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Feng, K., Xu, Aj., Wu, Pf. et al. Case-based reasoning model based on attribute weights optimized by genetic algorithm for predicting end temperature of molten steel in RH. J. Iron Steel Res. Int. 26, 585–592 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42243-019-00264-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42243-019-00264-4