Log in

Validation of AERMOD Prediction Accuracy for Particulate Matters (PM10, PM2.5) for a Large Coal Mine Complex: A Multisource Perspective

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Aerosol Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Particulate matter (PM) emission from coal mining activities is inevitable and a significant concern worldwide. American Meteorological Society/Environmental Protection Agency Regulatory Model (AERMOD) is one of the most widely used dispersion models for predicting air PM dispersion in coal mines. However, validation of AERMOD-predicted PM concentration in a large mine complex has not been reported. So, in this study, AERMOD predicted PM concentration was validated against the PM concentrations measured by nine continuous ambient air quality monitoring stations (CAAQMS) stationed in the Singrauli coal mining complex. The complex contains nine coal mines across 438 square kilometers, with around 129 pollution sources chiefly from the area, pit, and line categories. PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations peak during summer (204.58 µg/m3) and winter (67.67 µg/m3), respectively. The AERMOD model predicts peak dispersion of PM10 (500–1200 µg/m3) and PM2.5 (100–800 µg/m3) during the winter season. The AERMOD model reveals that the region’s wind movement caused by land and lake breezes was the predominant driver of PM surface dispersion. In the winter season, atmospheric inversion increases ground-level PM concentrations in the region. The AERMOD cannot represent the vertical dispersion of PMs in the summer, resulting in an underestimation of PM concentration. The statistical validation shows that AERMOD underestimates PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations across all seasons and years. The AERMOD model’s prediction accuracy for PM10 (R2 = 0.38) and PM2.5 (R2 = 0.56) is also low. Finally, it can be concluded that AERMOD-predicted PM concentrations are not accurate for large mining complexes but more suitable for individual mines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available as the data is collected from the concerned industry with their permission. The dataset is part of the Ph. D thesis but is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Authors wish to thank Coal India Limited for funding this project (project code: CIL/R&D/05/02/2021) and special thanks to Northern Coalfield Limited and Central Mine Planning & Design Institute for their technical and logistic help.

Funding

The research was funded by Coal India Limited under the project code number CIL/R&D/05/02/2021.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Dr. Tanushree Bhattacharya communicated and coordinated this research work, Navin Prasad and Akash Mishra carried out the tests, and data analysis and drafted the manuscript. Dr. Bindhu Lal conceived of the study and participated in research coordination. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tanushree Bhattacharya.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Software and Data Availability

Name of software: AERMOD VIEW 10.0.1. Year first available: 1996. Developers: Lakes Environment Software. License: Licensed Version (Serial #: AER0010836). Hardware and software requirements: An Intel Pentium 4 processor (or equivalent) or higher, at least 2 GB of available hard disk space, 1 GB of RAM (2 GB recommended).

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prasad, N., Mishra, A., Bhattacharya, T. et al. Validation of AERMOD Prediction Accuracy for Particulate Matters (PM10, PM2.5) for a Large Coal Mine Complex: A Multisource Perspective. Aerosol Sci Eng (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41810-024-00241-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41810-024-00241-9

Keywords

Navigation