Log in

Producing sustainable modified reactive powder concrete using locally available materials

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although extensive investigations have been carried out to produce reactive powder concrete (RPC), the majority of these investigations were conducted based on using fine sand with a maximum particle size of 600 microns and cured under certain conditions. Crushing and grinding processes applied to obtain smaller aggregate sizes and applying heat curing require consuming more energy, which may dramatically affect the cost of production and limit the applicability of this concrete. Thus, this paper mainly aims to assess the performance of RPC made from more cost-efficient sand (i.e., 5 mm fine aggregate) and cured under ambient conditions. For this purpose, a total of twelve mixes (nine with steel fibers and three without) were designed using the local materials to investigate the physical, mechanical, and durability performance of the produced RPC. Moreover, the influence of three different parameters namely, cement content (800, 850 and 900 kg/m3), silica fume ratio as a replacement to cement (0%, 15% and 25%), and steel fibers ratios (0% and 2%) on the performance of RPC was also studied. Water and superplasticizer ratios were kept constant at 0.18 and 4% of the cement weight, respectively. The results highlighted that the RPC produced from local materials using 5 mm maximum size of quartz sand was very efficient and the mechanical and durability properties were comparable to those commonly made from fine sand (600 microns), even under normal curing, giving a higher the possibility for applying RPC in construction applications. Moreover, the hybrid use of silica fume and steel fiber in producing RPC led to significant improvement in all tested properties (mechanical/durability), while only a reduction in the flowability of the mixes was noted by the inclusion of steel fiber.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Some or all data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Hiremath PN, Yaragal SC (2018) Performance evaluation of reactive powder concrete with polypropylene fibers at elevated temperatures. Constr Build Mater 169:499–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abid M, Hou X, Zheng W, Hussain RR (2017) High temperature and residual properties of reactive powder concrete—a review. Constr Build Mater 147:339–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cheyrezy M, Maret V, Frouin L (1995) Microstructural analysis of RPC (reactive powder concrete). Cem Concr Res 25(7):1491–1500. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(95)00143-Z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Richard P, Cheyrezy MH (1994) Reactive powder concretes with high ductility and 200–800 MPa compressive strength. Spec Publ 144:507–518

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ghafari E, Costa H, Júlio E (2015) (2015) Critical review on eco-efficient ultra-high performance concrete enhanced with nano-materials. Constr Build Mater 101:201–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Radhi MS, Rasoul ZMA, Alsaad AJ (2021) Mechanical behavior of modified reactive powder concrete with waste materials powder replacement. Period Polytech Civ Eng 65(2):649–655. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.17298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen X, Wan DW, ** LZ, Qian K, Fu F (2019) Experimental studies and microstructure analysis for ultra-high performance reactive powder concrete. Constr Build Mater 229:116924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hiremath PN, Yaragal SC (2017) Effect of different curing regimes and durations on early strength development of reactive powder concrete. Constr Build Mater 154:72–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chan YW, Chu SH (2004) Effect of silica fume on steel fiber bond characteristics in reactive powder concrete. Cem Concrete Res 34(7):1167–1172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.12.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hou X, Cao S, Rong Q, Zheng W, Li G (2018) Effects of steel fiber and strain rate on the dynamic compressive stress–strain relationship in reactive powder concrete. Constr Build Mater 170:570–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sanchayan S, Foster SJ (2016) High temperature behaviour of hybrid steel-PVA fibre reinforced reactive powder concrete. Mater Struct 49(3):769–782. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-015-0537-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ali B, Qureshi LA (2019) Durability of recycled aggregate concrete modified with sugarcane molasses. Constr Build Mater 229:116913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ali B, Qureshi LA (2019) Influence of glass fibers on mechanical and durability performance of concrete with recycled aggregates. Constr Build Mater 228:116783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vernet CP (2004) Ultra-durable concretes: structure at the micro-and nanoscale. MRS Bull 29(5):324–327. https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs2004.98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ghafari E, Bandarabadi M, Costa H, Júlio E (2012) Design of UHPC using artificial neural networks. In: Brittle matrix composites 10. Woodhead Publishing, pp 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857099891.61

  16. Wang D, Shi C, Wu Z, **ao J, Huang Z, Fang Z (2015) A review on ultra-high performance concrete: part II. Hydration, microstructure and properties. Constr Build Mater 96:368–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang W, Liu J, Agostini F, Davy CA, Skoczylas F, Corvez D (2014) Durability of an ultra-high performance fiber reinforced concrete (UHPFRC) under progressive aging. Cem Concr Res 55:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.09.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Roux N, Andrade C, Sanjuan M (1996) Experimental study of durability of reactive powder concretes. J Mater Civ Eng 8(1):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Alhawat M, Ashour A, Yildirim G, Aldemir A, Sahmaran M (2022) Properties of geopolymers sourced from construction and demolition waste: a review. J Build Eng 50:104104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zinkaah OH, Alridha Z, Alhawat M (2022) Numerical and theoretical analysis of FRP reinforced geopolymer concrete beams. Case Stud Constr Mater 16:e01052

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zinkaah OH, Al-RifaieA, Alhawat MM (2021) Predictability of existing standard codes for the flexural strength of beams produced from alkali-activated concrete. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, vol 2404, no 1. AIP Publishing LLC, p 080031

  22. Zhang P, Zhao YN, Li QF, Wang P, Zhang TH (2014) Flexural toughness of steel fiber reinforced high performance concrete containing nano-SiO2 and fly ash. Sci World J. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/403743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yahy AL-Radi HH, Dejian S, Sultan HK (2021) Performance of fiber self compacting concrete at high temperatures. Civ Eng J 7(12):2083–2098. https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-2021-03091779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang P, Li QF (2013) Durability of high performance concrete composites containing silica fume. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L J Mater Des Appl 227(4):343–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464420712460617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Graybeal BA (2006) Material property characterization of ultra-high performance concrete (No. FHWA-HRT-06–103). United States. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Infrastructure Research and Development, 2006

  26. Noshiravani T, Brühwiler E (2013) Experimental investigation on reinforced ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete composite beams subjected to combined bending and shear. ACI Struct J 110(2):251–261. https://doi.org/10.14359/51684405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Susetyo J, Gauvreau P, Vecchio FJ (2011) Effectiveness of steel fiber as minimum shear reinforcement. ACI Struct J. https://doi.org/10.14359/51682990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wille K, Naaman AE, El-Tawil S (2011) Optimizing ultra-high performance fiber-reinforced concrete. Concr Int 33(9):35–41

    Google Scholar 

  29. Abbas SMLN, Nehdi ML, Saleem MA (2016) Ultra-high performance concrete: Mechanical performance, durability, sustainability and implementation challenges. Int J Concr Struct Mater 10(3):271–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40069-016-0157-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Fehling E, Schmidt M, Stürwald S (2008) Ultra high performance concrete: (UHPC). In: Proceedings of the second international symposium on ultra high performance concrete, Kassel, Germany, 5–7 March 2008

  31. Zheng W, Luo B, Wang Y (2013) Compressive and tensile properties of reactive powder concrete with steel fibres at elevated temperatures. Constr Build Mater 41:844–851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.12.066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kadhum MM (2015) Studying of some mechanical properties of reactive powder concrete using local materials. J Eng 7(21):113–135

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sultan HK, Mohammed AT, Qasim OD, Maula BH, Aziz HY (2020) Ductility factor evaluation of concrete moment frame retrofitted by FRP subjected to seismic loads. Int Rev Civ Eng (I.R.E.C.E.) 11(6):275–282. https://doi.org/10.15866/irece.v11i6.18670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Qasim OA, Sultan HK (2020) Experimental investigation of effect of steel fiber on concrete construction joints of prism. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 745(1):012170. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/745/1/012170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Al-Tikrite A, Hadi MN (2017) Mechanical properties of reactive powder concrete containing industrial and waste steel fibres at different ratios under compression. Constr Build Mater 154:1024–1034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Xun X, Ronghua Z, Yinghu L (2020) Influence of curing regime on properties of reactive powder concrete containing waste steel fibers. Constr Build Mater 232:117129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Yang SL, Millard SG, Soutsos MN, Barnett SJ, Le TT (2009) Influence of aggregate and curing regime on the mechanical properties of ultra-high performance fibre reinforced concrete (UHPFRC). Constr Build Mater 23(6):2291–2298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.11.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Arel HŞ (2016) Effects of curing type, silica fume fineness, and fiber length on the mechanical properties and impact resistance of UHPFRC. Results Phys 6:664–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2016.09.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Yiğiter H, Aydın S, Yazıcı H, Yardımcı MY (2012) Mechanical performance of low cement reactive powder concrete (LCRPC). Compos B Eng 43(8):2907–2914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.07.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wille K, Naaman AE, El-Tawil S, Parra-Montesinos GJ (2012) Ultra-high performance concrete and fiber reinforced concrete: achieving strength and ductility without heat curing. Mater Struct 45(3):309–324. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-011-9767-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Li HY, Zheng WZ, Luo BF (2012) Experimental research on compressive strength degradation of reactive powder concrete after high temperature. J Harbin Inst Technol 44:17–22

    Google Scholar 

  42. Malik AR, Foster SJ (2008) Behaviour of reactive powder concrete columns without steel ties. J Adv Concr Technol 6(2):377–386. https://doi.org/10.3151/jact.6.377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Sultan HK, Alyaseri I (2020) (2020) Effects of elevated temperatures on mechanical properties of reactive powder concrete elements. Constr Build Mater 261:120555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. ASTM D422-63 (2007) Standard test method for particle-size analysis of soils (withdrawn 2016). American Society for Testing and Materials Standard Practice C109, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  45. ASTM D422-63 (2017) Standard specification for chemical admixtures for concrete. ASTM C494. ASTM, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ahmad S, Zubair A, Maslehuddin M (2015) Effect of key mixture parameters on flow and mechanical properties of reactive powder concrete. Constr Build Mater 99:73–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.09.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Mostofinejad D, Nikoo MR, Hosseini SA (2016) Determination of optimized mix design and curing conditions of reactive powder concrete (RPC). Constr Build Mater 123:754–767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Lee MG, Kan YC, Chen KC (2006) A preliminary study of RPC for repair and retrofitting materials. J Chin Inst Eng 29(6):1099–1103. https://doi.org/10.1080/02533839.2006.9671209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. ASTM C1437 (2015) Standard Test Method for Flow of Hydraulic Cement Mortar. ASTM, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  50. ASTM C109/C109M-20b (2020) Standard test method for compressive strength of hydraulic cement mortars (using 2-in. or [50 mm] cube specimens). ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  51. ASTM C469 (2010) Standard test method for static modulus of elasticity and Poisson’s ratio of concrete in compression. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  52. British Standard Institute (2004) Eurocode 2: design of concrete structures—part 1. 2: general rules—structural fire design. BS EN. 1992-1-2

  53. ASTM C496 (2017) Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. American Society for Testing and Materials Standard Practice C496, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  54. ASTM C293 (2016) Standard test method for flexural strength of concrete (using simple beam with center point loading). ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  55. ASTM C1585-13 (2013) Standard test method for measurement of rate of absorption of water by hydraulic-cement concretes. Annu. B. Stand., West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  56. ASTM C642 (2013) Standard test method for density, absorption, and voids in hardened concrete. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  57. GWT (2002) Instruction and maintenance manual. GWA International Limited, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  58. Yu R, Spiesz P, Brouwers HJH (2014) Mix design and properties assessment of ultra-high performance fibre reinforced concrete (UHPFRC). Cem Concr Res 56:29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Gao XM (2013) Effect of steel fiber on the performance of ultra-high performance concrete. Doctoral dissertation, Hunan University, Changsha

  60. Bederina M, Makhloufi Z, Bouziani T (2011) Effect of limestone fillers the physic-mechanical properties of limestone concrete. Phys Procedia 21:28–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2011.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Bosiljkov VB (2003) SCC mixes with poorly graded aggregate and high volume of limestone filler. Cem Concr Res 33(9):1279–1286. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(03)00013-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Gesoğlu M, Güneyisi E, Kocabağ ME, Bayram V, Mermerdaş K (2012) Fresh and hardened characteristics of self-compacting concretes made with combined use of marble powder, limestone filler, and fly ash. Constr Build Mater 37:160–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Wu Z, Shi C, He W, Wu L (2016) Effects of steel fiber content and shape on mechanical properties of ultra-high performance concrete. Constr Build Mater 103:8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.11.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Alsalman A, Dang CN, Hale WM (2017) Development of ultra-high performance concrete with locally available materials. Constr Build Mater 133:135–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Bonneau O, Vernet C, Moranvill M, Altcin PC (2000) Characterization of the granular packing and percolation threshold of reactive powder concrete. Cem Concr Res 30(2000):1861–1867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Long GC (2003) The composites, structures, and properties of reactive powder concrete, Ph.D. Thesis, Tongji University, China

  67. Long GC, **e YJ, Wang PM, Jiang ZW (2005) Properties and micro/mecrostructure of reactive powder concrete. J Chin Ceram Soc 4(2005):456–461

    Google Scholar 

  68. Alaee FJ (2001) Retrofitting of concrete structures using high performance fiber reinforced cementitious composite (HPFRCC), Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wales, Cardiff, p 220

  69. Wang C, Yang CH, Liu F, Wan CJ, Pu XC (2012) Preparation of ultra-high performance concrete with common technology and materials. Cem Concr Compos 34(2012):538–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Mehta PK, Monteiro PJM (2006) Concrete, microstructure, properties and materials, 3rd edn. Mc Graw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  71. Ma J, Schneider H (2002) Properties of ultra-high-performance concrete. Leipzig Annual Civil Engineering Report (LACER), No. 7, pp 25–32

  72. Neville AM (2011) Properties of concrete, 5th edn. Education Books, Pitman Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  73. Malik AR, Foster SJ (2010) Carbon fiber-reinforced polymer confined reactive powder concrete columns—experimental investigation. ACI Struct J 107(3):263–271

    Google Scholar 

  74. Maroliya KM, Modhera DC (2010) A comparative study of reactive powder concrete containing steel fibers and recron 3s fibers. J Eng Res Stus I(I):83–89

    Google Scholar 

  75. Wong HHC, Kwan AKH (2008) Packing density: a key concept for mix design of high performance concrete. Hong Kong Productivity Council, Hong Kong

    Google Scholar 

  76. Voort T (2008) Design and field testing of tapered H-shaped ultra-high performance concrete piles. Master Thesis, Iowa State University, p 243

  77. Aitcin P (2000) Cements of yesterday and today—concrete of tomorrow. Cem Concr Res 30(9):1349–1359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Hajek P, Fiala C (2008) Environmentally optimized floor slabs using UHPC-contribution to sustainable building. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on ultra-high performance concrete, Kassel, Germany, pp 879–886

  79. Walraven J (2008) On the way to design recommendations for UHPFRC. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on ultra-high performance concrete, Kassel, Germany

  80. Racky P (2004) Cost-effectiveness and sustainability of UHPC. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on ultra high performance concrete, Kassel, Germany, pp 797–805

  81. Blais Y, Couture M (2000) Precast, prestressed pedestrian bridge—world’s first reactive powder concrete structure. PCI J 44(5):60–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Schmidt M, Teichmann T (2007) Development of an ultrahigh performance concrete for the company SW Umwelttechnik. Final report, Kassel, Germany

  83. Vivian TWY (2005) Recycled aggregate from concrete waste for higher grade of concrete construction. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Building and Construction, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong

  84. Zinkaah OH, Sultan HK, Al-Rifaie A, Alridha Z (2022) Influence of strut geometry on the size effect of FRP reinforced simply supported deep beams: a theoretical analysis. Math Model Eng Probl 9(2):411–417. https://doi.org/10.18280/mmep.090215

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hussein Kareem Sultan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sultan, H.K., Zinkaah, O.H., Rasheed, A.A. et al. Producing sustainable modified reactive powder concrete using locally available materials. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 7, 342 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-022-00948-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-022-00948-z

Keywords

Navigation