Abstract
In the study, flexural performances of FRP reinforced concrete (RC) slabs with different fiber and bar surface properties were investigated. Glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP), Carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP), Aramid fiber reinforced polymer (AFRP) and Basalt fiber reinforced polymer (BFRP) steel reinforcements were used in the reinforcement of the slabs. A total of 27 slabs were produced in the dimensions of 1100–1100–100 mm and with the same reinforcement ratios as FRP and steel reinforcement and were tested with the four-point flexural test method. The flexural strength, moment capacity, toughness and ductility values of the slabs were calculated by determining their flexural behaviour, and the average values were compared. In the comparison, the behaviour of the FRP RC slabs was analysed by taking the steel RC slabs as reference. The effects of FRP fiber type and bar surface properties on slab behaviour were evaluated. The bending load-carrying capacity of AFRP and GFRP RC slabs with ribbed surfaces was 4% higher than those with sand-coated surfaces. In addition, the bending load-carrying capacity of BFRP and CFRP RC slabs with sand-coated surfaces was 13% and 16% higher than those with ribbed surfaces, respectively. The type of failure in slabs varies based on the type of reinforcement and the surface properties of the reinforcement. Three types of failures have been identified: flexural failure, shear failure, and flexural-shear failure. The ductility performance of steel RC slabs has been determined to be the highest, with a value of 9.45. When comparing toughness, sand-coated FRP bars exhibit toughness levels 8–40% higher than ribbed ones. Among the FRP RC slabs, sand-coated CFRP RC slabs provide the greatest contribution to flexural load-carrying capacities.
References
Aydin F (2018) Experimental investigation of thermal expansion and concrete strength effects on FRP bars behavior embedded in concrete. Constr Build Mater 163:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.101
Aydin F (2016) Effects of various temperatures on the mechanical strength of GFRP box profiles. Constr Build Mater 127:843–849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.09.130
Ahmeda AA, Hassana M, Mohamed H, Abouzied A, Masmoudi R (2018) Axial behavior of circular CFFT long columns internally reinforced with steel or carbon and glass FRP longitudinal bars. Eng Struct 155:267–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.11.037
Ge W, Chen K, Guan Z, Ashour A, Lu W, Cao D (2021) Eccentric compression behaviour of concrete columns reinforced with steel-FRP composite bars. Eng Struct 238:112240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112240
Vanagas E, Kliukas R, Lukoševičienė O (2017) Strength of circular concrete columns reinforced with FRP bars and spirals. Proc Eng 172:1220–1226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.02.143
Danielle LT, Emel KDB, Harvey SM, Marish SM (2023) Estimating the flexural strength of corroded reinforced concrete beams based on rectangular compressive stress block. J Eng Res. 11(1):100005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jer.2023.100005
Elmessalami N, Refai AE, Abed F (2019) Fiber-reinforced polymers bars for compression reinforcement: a promising alternative to steel bars. Constr Build Mater 209:725–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.105
Reichenbach S, Preinstorfer P, Hammerl M, Kromoser B (2021) A review on embedded fibre-reinforced polymer reinforcement in structural concrete in Europe. Constr Build Mater 307:124946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124946
Cosgun SI, Kaya A, Gencturk B (2023) Computational modeling of the axial behavior of corroded and buckled short steel piles strengthened using concrete-filled GFRP jackets. Eng Fail Anal 147:107147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107147
Irshidat MR, Haddad RH, Al-Amarat F (2022) Effect of heating level on the contribution of CFRP bars in the axial load-carrying capacity of RC columns. Int J Civ Eng 20:513–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-021-00680-2
Aydın E, Boru E, Aydın F (2021) Effects of FRP bar type and fiber reinforced concrete on the flexural behavior of hybrid beams. Constr Build Mater 279:122407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122407
Aydın F (2019) Experimental study on the flexural behaviour of a novel concrete filled hybrid beams with GFRP and steel bars. KSCE J Civ Eng 23:4710–4717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-019-1714-6
Abbas H, Abadel A, Almusallam T, Al-Salloum Y (2022) Experimental and analytical study of flexural performance of concrete beams reinforced with hybrid of GFRP and steel rebars. Eng Fail Anal 138:106397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106397
Boru E, Aydın E, Sadid MS (2023) Investigation of bending behaviors of GFRP-strengthened steel RHS profiles with experimental and numerical models. Buildings 13(5):1216. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13051216
Aminakbari N, Kabir MZ, Rahai A, Hosseinnia A (2023) Experimental and numerical evaluation of GFRP-reinforced concrete beams under consecutive low-velocity impact loading. Int J Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-023-00883-9
Zhang Y, Elsayed M, Zhang LV, Nehdi ML (2021) Flexural behavior of reinforced concrete T-section beams strengthened by NSM FRP bars. Eng Struct 233:111922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.111922
Sogut K, Dirar S, Theofanous M, Faramarzi A, Nayak AN (2021) Effect of transverse and longitudinal reinforcement ratios on the behaviour of RC T-beams shear-strengthened with embedded FRP BARS. Compos Struct 262:113622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113622
Al-Hamrani A, Alnahhal W (2021) Shear behavior of basalt FRC beams reinforced with basalt FRP bars and glass FRP stirrups: Experimental and analytical investigations. Eng Struct 242:112612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112612
Su C, Wang X, Ding L, Chen Z, Liu S, Wu Z (2021) Experimental study on the seismic behavior of seawater sea sand concrete beams reinforced with steel-FRP composite bars. Eng Struct 248:113269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113269
Yang Y, Pan D, Wu G, Cao D (2021) A new design method of the equivalent stress–strain relationship for hybrid (FRP bar and steel bar) reinforced concrete beams. Compos Struct 270:114099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114099
Han S, Zhou A, Ou J (2021) Relationships between interfacial behavior and flexural performance of hybrid steel-FRP composite bars reinforced seawater sea-sand concrete beams. Compos Struct 277:114672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114672
Aydın F, Aydın E, Saribiyik A, Boru E, Arslan S, Sarıbıyık M (2023) Experimental investigation of the effects of FRP bar fiber type and surface characteristics on the performance of reinforced concrete beams. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-023-01301-9
Ju M, Ju JWW, Sim J (2021) A new formula of punching shear strength for fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) or steel reinforced two-way concrete slabs. Compos Struct 259:113471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113471
Hassan M, Ahmed EA, Benmokrane B (2014) Punching-shear design equation for two-way concrete slabs reinforced with FRP bars and stirrups. Constr Build Mater 66:522–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.036
Metwally IM (2013) Prediction of punching shear capacities of two-way concrete slabs reinforced with FRP bars. HBRC Journal 9:125–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbrcj.2013.05.009
Abdul-Salam B, Farghaly AS, Benmokrane B (2016) Mechanisms of shear resistance of one-way concrete slabs reinforced with FRP bars. Constr Build Mater 127:959–970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.10.015
Zheng Y, Zhou L, Taylor SE, Ma H (2019) Serviceability of one-way high-volume fly ash-self-compacting concrete slabs reinforced with basalt FRP bars. Constr Build Mater 217:108–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.044
Erfan AM, Elnaby RMA, Badr AA, El-Sayed TA (2021) Flexural behavior of HSC one way slabs reinforced with basalt FRP bars. Case Stud Constr Mater 14:e00513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00513
Bouguerra K, Ahmed EA, El-Gamal S, Benmokrane B (2011) Testing of full-scale concrete bridge deck slabs reinforced with fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) bars. Constr Build Mater. 25:3956–3965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.04.028
El-Ragaby A, El-Salakawy E, Benmokrane B (2007) Fatigue analysis of concrete bridge deck slabs reinforced with E-glass/vinyl ester FRP reinforcing bars. Compos Part B. 38(5–6):703–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.07.012
Al-Rousana RZ, Alhassana M, Al-wadia R (2020) Nonlinear finite element analysis of full-scale concrete bridge deck slabs reinforced with FRP bars. Structures 27:1820–1831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.08.024
Wang Y, Gu Y, Liu J (2020) A domain-decomposition generalized finite difference method for stress analysis in three-dimensional composite materials. Appl Math Lett 104:106226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2020.106226
Kabir H, Aghdam MM (2021) A generalized 2D Bézier-based solution for stress analysis of notched epoxy resin plates reinforced with graphene nanoplatelets. Thin-Walled Struct 169:108484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2021.108484
Bert CW, Malik M (1997) Differential quadrature: a powerful new technique for analysis of composite structures. Compos Struct 39(3–4):179–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8223(97)00112-8
Acknowledgements
This study was financially supported by the Republic of Turkey Ministry of Industry and Technology’s project numbered 0449. STZ.2013-2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Aydın, F., Boru, E., Durmaz, N. et al. An Experimental Investigation of Flexural Performance of FRP Reinforced Concrete Slabs. Int J Civ Eng (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-024-01013-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-024-01013-9