Abstract
Prediction of crop coefficients is important to establish optimized irrigation water scheduling and management practices. In the present study, regression modeling was utilized to predict the field crop coefficients of crops grown in the humid sub-tropical agro-climate of Hamirpur (Himachal Pradesh, India). Field experiments were conducted on seven crops categorized as Cereals (Wheat and Maize), Oilseed (Indian mustard), Vegetable (Potato), Fodder crop (Sorghum), Green manure crop (Guar), and Legumes (Pea). The crop coefficients were determined using a modification and field-based approach. In the modification approach, FAO-recommended standard crop coefficients were modified using the crop coefficient modification procedure given in FAO-56. In the field-based approach, crop coefficients were obtained as the ratio of field crop evapotranspiration to the reference evapotranspiration. FAO modified crop coefficients presented satisfactory performance with the field crop coefficients (squared error = 0.0009–0.0225; R2 = 0.80–0.89; bias error = − 0.09–0.15). New crop coefficients were developed by performing regression modeling between the FAO modified and field-based crop coefficients. Furthermore, new crop evapotranspiration values were obtained using new crop coefficients, which presented a strong and reliable agreement with the field crop evapotranspiration values, i.e., they exhibited small bias error = 10–24 mm, and high R2 = 0.90–0.93. The developed regression equations can be employed as useful tools for predicting field crop coefficients from the FAO-56 modified crop coefficients, subsequently resulting in the precise estimation of the crop evapotranspiration.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40808-021-01234-0/MediaObjects/40808_2021_1234_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40808-021-01234-0/MediaObjects/40808_2021_1234_Fig2_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40808-021-01234-0/MediaObjects/40808_2021_1234_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40808-021-01234-0/MediaObjects/40808_2021_1234_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40808-021-01234-0/MediaObjects/40808_2021_1234_Fig5_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40808-021-01234-0/MediaObjects/40808_2021_1234_Fig6_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40808-021-01234-0/MediaObjects/40808_2021_1234_Fig7_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40808-021-01234-0/MediaObjects/40808_2021_1234_Fig8_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40808-021-01234-0/MediaObjects/40808_2021_1234_Fig9_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- R n :
-
Net radiation at crop surface (MJ m−2 day−1)
- G :
-
Soil heat flux density (MJ m−2 day−1)
- T :
-
Mean daily air temperature at 2 m height (°C)
- (es−ea):
-
Saturation vapor pressure deficit (kPa)
- Δ:
-
Slope of vapor pressure curve (kPa °C−1)
- γ :
-
Psychrometric constant (kPa °C−1)
- I :
-
Average infiltration depth (mm)
- K c ini (FAO) :
-
FAO-recommended Kc ini value
- K c ini (heavy wetting) :
-
KC ini derived from the FAO-curve corresponding to the heavy wetting
- K c ini (light wetting) :
-
KC ini derived from FAO-curve corresponding to light wetting for the corresponding parameters
- K c mid/end(FAO) :
-
FAO-recommended Kc value
- RHmin :
-
Mean value for daily minimum relative humidity (%) (20% < RHmin < 80%)
- u 2 :
-
Mean value for daily wind speed at 2 m height (m s−1) (1 m s−1 < u2 < 6 m s−1)
References
Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration–guidelines for computing crop water requirements-FAO irrigation and drainage paper 56. FAO Rome 300(9):D05109
Benli B, Kodal S, Ilbeyi A, Ustun H (2006) Determination of evapotranspiration and basal crop coefficient of alfalfa with a weighing lysimeter. Agric Water Manage 81(3):358–370
Jamshidi S, Zand-Parsa S, Kamgar-Haghighi AA, Shahsavar AR, Niyogi D (2020) Evapotranspiration, crop coefficients, and physiological responses of citrus trees in semi-arid climatic conditions. Agric Water Manag 227:105838
Kumar N, Shankar V, Poddar A (2020) Investigating the effect of limited climatic data on evapotranspiration-based numerical modeling of soil moisture dynamics in the unsaturated root zone: a case study for potato crop. Model Earth Syst Environ 6:2433–2449
Kumari S, Poddar A, Kumar N, Shankar V (2021) Delineation of groundwater recharge potential zones using the modeling based on remote sensing, GIS and MIF techniques: a study of Hamirpur District, Himachal Pradesh, India. Model Earth Syst Environ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-021-01181-w
Laqui W, Zubieta R, Rau P, Mejía A, Lavado W, Ingol E (2019) Can artificial neural networks estimate potential evapotranspiration in Peruvian highlands? Model Earth Syst Environ 5(4):1911–1924
Lima J, Antonino A, Souza E, Hammecker C, Montenegro S, Lira C (2013) Calibration of Hargreaves-Samani equation for estimating reference evapotranspiration in the sub-humid region of Brazil. J Water Resour Prot 5(12):A1–A5
Minacapilli M, Agnese C, Blanda F, Cammalleri C, Ciraolo G, D’Urso G, Iovino M, Pumo D, Provenzano G, Rallo G (2009) Estimation of actual evapotranspiration of Mediterranean perennial crops by means of remote-sensing based surface energy balance models. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 13:1061–1074
Mobe NT, Dzikiti S, Zirebwa SF, Midgley SJE, von Loeper W, Mazvimavi D, Jovanovic NZ (2020) Estimating crop coefficients for apple orchards with varying canopy cover using measured data from twelve orchards in the Western Cape Province South Africa. Agric Water Manage 233:106103
Mohsin S, Lone MA (2020) Modeling of reference evapotranspiration for temperate Kashmir Valley using linear regression. Model Earth Syst Environ 7(1):495–502
Montazar A, Rejmanek H, Tindula G, Little C, Shapland T, Anderson F, Hill J (2016) Crop coefficient curve for paddy rice from residual energy balance calculations. J Irrig Drain Eng 143:04016076
Nandagiri L, Kovoor GM (2006) Performance evaluation of reference evapotranspiration equations across a range of Indian climates. J Irrig Drain Eng 132(3):238–249
Nhamo L, Magidi J, Nyamugama A, Clulow AD, Sibanda M, Chimonyo VG, Mabhaudhi T (2020) Prospects of improving agricultural and water productivity through unmanned aerial vehicles. Agriculture 10(7):256
Pandey V, Pandey PK, Mahanta AP (2014) Calibration and performance verification of Hargreaves-Samani equation in a humid region. Irrig Drain 63:659–667
Pandey PK, Dabral PP, Pandey V (2016) Evaluation of reference evapotranspiration methods for the northeastern region of India. Int Soil Water Conserv Res 4(1):52–63
Pereira LS, Allen RG, Smith M, Raes D (2015) Crop evapotranspiration estimation with FAO56: past and future. Agric Water Manag 147:4–20
Poddar A, Gupta P, Kumar N, Shankar V, Ojha CSP (2018) Evaluation of reference evapotranspiration methods and sensitivity analysis of climatic parameters for sub-humid sub-tropical locations in western Himalayas (India). ISH J Hydraul Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/09715010.2018.1551731
Poddar A, Kumar N, Kumar R, Shankar V, Jat MK (2020) Evaluation of non-linear root water uptake model under different agro-climates. Curr Sci 119(3):485–496. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v119/i3/485-496
Shankar V (2007) Modelling of moisture uptake by plants. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Roorkee
Tyagi S, Singh N, Sonkar G, Mall RK (2019) Sensitivity of evapotranspiration to climate change using DSSAT model in sub humid climate region of Eastern Uttar Pradesh. Model Earth Syst Environ 5(1):1–11
Uniyal B, Dietrich J, Vu NQ, Jha MK, Arumí JL (2019) Simulation of regional irrigation requirement with SWAT in different agro-climatic zones driven by observed climate and two reanalysis datasets. Sci Total Environ 649:846–865
Valipour M, Sefidkouhi MAG, Raeini M (2017) Selecting the best model to estimate potential evapotranspiration with respect to climate change and magnitudes of extreme events. Agric Water Manag 180:50–60
**ang K, Li Y, Horton R, Feng H (2020) Similarity and difference of potential evapotranspiration and reference crop evapotranspiration–a review. Agric Water Manag 232:106043
Yirga SA (2019) Modeling reference evapotranspiration for Megecha catchment by multiple linear regression. Model Earth Syst Environ 5(2):471–477
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the support extended by National Institute of Technology Hamirpur (India) and Shoolini University (India). The authors are thankful to the reviewers for providing constructive criticism on the paper.
Funding
The financial support for the study was received through DBT (Department of Biotechnology, Govt. of India) sponsored project titled “Social-economic-environmental tradeoffs in managing Land-river interface (2019–2021)”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Poddar, A., Kumar, N., Kumar, R. et al. Application of regression modeling for the prediction of field crop coefficients in a humid sub-tropical agro-climate: a study in Hamirpur district of Himachal Pradesh (India). Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 8, 2369–2381 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-021-01234-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-021-01234-0