Log in

An investigation into the use of load reduction devices integrated with high-modulus synthetic mooring lines for semi-submersible station kee**

  • Research
  • Published:
Journal of Ocean Engineering and Marine Energy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Floating offshore wind (FOW) requires cost reduction to compete with fixed offshore wind, and other traditional and renewable energy sources. One major cost contributor in FOW is the mooring system. Volume effects are expected to deliver significant savings for most cost drivers, but moorings are already produced at scale and at volume for the oil and gas sector, and innovation is required to address the specific challenges of FOW. This paper investigates the use of Dublin Offshore’s load reduction device (LRD) integrated with high-modulus synthetic mooring lines in an inclined taut mooring (ITM) configuration for semi-submersible station kee**. The ITM comprises a 3-line array with vertically loaded anchors within a reduced mooring footprint, fully synthetic Dyneema® DM20 mooring lines, and optimized system compliance provided through an in-line LRD on each mooring line. The ITM allows mooring designers to significantly reduce component count, risk of failure, CAPEX, and lifetime cost of the mooring system. Wave tank testing was carried out at 1:60 scale using a variant of the TetraSub, a market-ready 15 MW semi-submersible FOW platform, developed by Stiesdal Offshore Technologies (SOT) at the Offshore Basin in MARIN in Q3 2021. The experimental results of wave tank testing presented in this paper demonstrate the feasibility of the innovative ITM mooring configuration. In addition, good agreement is observed between LRD quasi-static performance and each of the numerical analysis in OrcaFlex, and the wave tank testing results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All material is the original work of the authors and owned by the authors. The testing and analysis data generated within the study are presented in this paper. Commercially sensitive data have not been presented. Additional data are available on request.

Abbreviations

COB:

Centre of buoyancy

COG:

Centre of gravity

γ:

Peak enhancement factor

H:

Wave height regular wave

Hs :

Significant wave height

HMPE:

High modulus polyethylene

FOW:

Floating offshore wind

GM(t):

Transverse metacentric height

ITM:

Inclined taut mooring

LRD:

Load reduction device

RNA:

Rotor nacelle assembly

SOT:

Stiesdal offshore technologies

SWL:

Safe working load

SS:

SeaState

T:

Wave period regular wave

Tp :

Wave peak period irregular wave

TRL:

Technology readiness level

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the staff at MARIN for their support during testing.

The authors would like to thank the Marinet2 Transnational Access Programme for supporting the test campaign.

Funding

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 731084. This Horizon2020 funding was received through the Marinet2 Transnational Access Programme. No other funding was received. Danny Golden, Tom Doyle and David Carr of Dublin Offshore have contributed the design and oversight of the testing campaign, the numerical analysis of results, and the primary authoring of the paper. Rigo Bosman of Avient has contributed detailed technical review of the test campaign and paper and specifications for the mooring line. Michael Borg of Stiesdal has contributed detailed analysis of the semi-sub platform, and detailed technical review of the test campaign and paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Danny Golden, Tom Doyle and David Carr of Dublin Offshore have contributed the design and oversight of the testing campaign, the numerical analysis of results, and the primary authoring of the paper. Rigo Bosman of Avient has contributed detailed technical review of the test campaign and paper and specifications for the mooring line. Michael Borg of Stiesdal has contributed detailed analysis of the semi-sub platform, and detailed technical review of the test campaign and paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Danny Golden.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors confirm no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Golden, D., Doyle, T., Borg, M. et al. An investigation into the use of load reduction devices integrated with high-modulus synthetic mooring lines for semi-submersible station kee**. J. Ocean Eng. Mar. Energy 10, 475–488 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40722-024-00323-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40722-024-00323-3

Keywords

Navigation