Log in

An intelligent approach to predict thermal injuries during orthopaedic bone drilling using machine learning

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The thermal injuries increase with temperature elevation during bone drilling that can cause irreversible, permanent death of regenerative bony cells resulting in thermal osteonecrosis. The ascent in temperature during the drilling procedure is a significant concern for every orthopaedic surgeon. Since it is difficult to monitor and predict temperature elevation during real-time in vivo medical surgery, a robust predictive machine-learning (ML) model has been proposed in the present work. Successively, the efficiency of rotary ultrasonic-assisted bone drilling (RUABD) is experimentally verified to reduce thermal injuries during bone drilling. Several rigorous in vitro experiments were performed on pig femur bone with changing independent variables like rotational speed, feedrate, abrasive grit size, and vibrational ultrasonic power during the study. The assumptions for the implementation of machine learning models have been successfully corroborated and validated. The multi-linear regression was compared with a multilayer perceptron, lasso regression, and ridge regression to provide the most accurate predictive models. The accuracy of ML models was observed with different error metrics such as mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), and mean square error (MSE). The error metrics of ridge regression were comparatively lower with MAE 1.702 ± 0.229, RMSE 2.015 ± 0.398 and MSE 5.214 ± 1.840 than other ML models. The Ridge regression model was able to predict temperature rise during bone drilling with an adequacy of ± 1.7 °C. The prediction of thermal injuries using machine learning models is the key contribution and a proof-of-concept of the present in vitro study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Noordin MY, Jiawkok N, Ndaruhadi PYMW, Kurniawan D (2015) Machining of bone: analysis of cutting force and surface roughness by turning process. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H J Eng Med 229:761–768. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954411915606169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Huiyu H, Chengyong W, Yue Z et al (2017) Investigating bone chip formation in craniotomy. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H J Eng Med 231:959–974. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954411917727245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yao Y, Wang L, Li J et al (2020) A novel auxetic structure based bone screw design: Tensile mechanical characterization and pullout fixation strength evaluation. Mater Des 188:108424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen J, An Q, Zou F et al (2021) Analysis of low-frequency vibration-assisted bone drilling in reducing thermal injury. Mater Manuf Process 36:27–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2020.1813891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Singh RP, Pandey PM, Mridha AR, Joshi T (2020) Experimental investigations and statistical modeling of cutting force and torque in rotary ultrasonic bone drilling of human cadaver bone. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H J Eng Med 234:148–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954411919889913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gupta V, Pandey PM (2017) In-situ tool wear monitoring and its effects on the performance of porcine cortical bone drilling: a comparative in-vitro investigation. Mech Adv Mater Mod Process 3:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40759-017-0019-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gupta V, Pandey PM, Mridha AR, Gupta RK (2017) Effect of various parameters on the temperature distribution in conventional and diamond coated hollow tool bone drilling: a comparative study. Procedia engineering. Elsevier, pp 90–98

    Google Scholar 

  8. Feldmann A, Ganser P, Nolte L, Zysset P (2017) Orthogonal cutting of cortical bone: Temperature elevation and fracture toughness. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 118–119:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2017.03.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jamil M, Rafique S, Khan AM et al (2020) Comprehensive analysis on orthopedic drilling: A state-of-the-art review. Proc. Inst. Mech Eng Part H J Eng Med 234:537–561

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pandey RK, Panda SS (2013) Drilling of bone: a comprehensive review. J Clin Orthop Trauma 4:15–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2013.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Agarwal R, Gupta V, Singh J (2022) Mechanical and biological behaviour of additive manufactured biomimetic biodegradable orthopaedic cortical screws. Rapid Prototyp J 4:1–25. https://doi.org/10.1108/rpj-01-2022-0006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Agarwal R, Gupta V, Singh J (2022) Additive manufacturing-based design approaches and challenges for orthopaedic bone screws: a state-of-the-art review. J Brazilian Soc Mech Sci Eng 44:1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-021-03331-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Agarwal R, Mehtani HK, Singh J, Gupta V (2022) Post-yielding fracture mechanics of 3D printed polymer-based orthopedic cortical screws. Polym Compos 43:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.26620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gok K, Erdem M, Kisioglu Y et al (2021) Development of bone chip - vacuum system in orthopedic drilling process. J Brazilian Soc Mech Sci Eng 43:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-021-02959-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Amewoui F, Le Coz G, Bonnet AS, Moufki A (2019) Bone drilling: a thermal model for bone temperature prediction. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 22:S305–S307. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2020.1714922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fernandes MGA, Fonseca EMM, Natal RJ (2016) Thermal analysis during bone drilling using rigid polyurethane foams: numerical and experimental methodologies. J Brazilian Soc Mech Sci Eng 38:1855–1863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-016-0560-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pandey RK, Panda S (2015) Optimization of bone drilling using Taguchi methodology coupled with fuzzy based desirability function approach. J Intell Manuf 26:1121–1129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-013-0844-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Akgundogdu A, Jennane R, Aufort G, Benhamou CL (2010) 3D image analysis and artificial intelligence for bone disease classification. J Med Syst 34:815–828. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-009-9296-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pandey RK, Panda SS (2014) A feasibility investigation for modeling and optimization of temperature in bone drilling using fuzzy logic and Taguchi optimization methodology. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H J Eng Med 228:1135–1145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954411914559738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zahedi E, Khosravian F, Wang W et al (2020) Towards skill transfer via learning-based guidance in human-robot interaction: an application to orthopaedic surgical drilling skill. J Intell Robot Syst 98:667–678. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-019-01082-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pandey RK, Panda SS (2013) Modeling of temperature in orthopaedic drilling using fuzzy logic. Appl Mech Mater 249:1313–1318. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.249-250.1313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee J, Davari H, Singh J, Pandhare V (2018) Industrial Artificial Intelligence for industry 4. 0-based manufacturing systems. Manuf Lett 18:20–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2018.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee J, Ni J, Singh J et al (2020) Intelligent maintenance systems and predictive manufacturing. J Manuf Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4047856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pandey RK, Panda SS (2013) Predicting temperature in orthopaedic drilling using back propagation neural network. Procedia Eng 51:676–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.01.096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lu C, Ko EW, Liu L (2009) Improving the video imaging prediction of postsurgical facial profiles with an artificial. J Dent Sci 4:118–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1991-7902(09)60017-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. da Silva FB, Corso LL, Costa CA (2021) Optimization of pedicle screw position using finite element method and neural networks. J Brazilian Soc Mech Sci Eng 43:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-021-02880-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Alam K, Silberschmidt VV (2014) Analysis of temperature in conventional and ultrasonically-assisted drilling of cortical bone with infrared thermography. Technol Heal Care 22:243–252. https://doi.org/10.3233/THC-140813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gupta V, Singh RP, Pandey PM, Gupta R (2020) In vitro comparison of conventional surgical and rotary ultrasonic bone drilling techniques. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H J Eng Med 234:398–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954411919898301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Shakouri E, Sadeghi MH, Karafi MR et al (2015) An in vitro study of thermal necrosis in ultrasonic-assisted drilling of bone. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H J Eng Med 229:137–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954411915573064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Singh G, Jain V, Gupta D, Sharma A (2018) Parametric effect of vibrational drilling on osteonecrosis and comparative histopathology study with conventional drilling of cortical bone. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H J Eng Med 232:975–986. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954411918794983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Agarwal R, Gupta V, Jain V (2021) A novel technique of harvesting cortical bone grafts during orthopaedic surgeries. J Brazilian Soc Mech Sci Eng 8:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-021-03064-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Agarwal R, Jain V, Gupta V et al (2020) Effect of surface topography on pull-out strength of cortical screw after ultrasonic bone drilling: an in vitro study. J Brazilian Soc Mech Sci Eng 42:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-020-02449-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Gupta V, Pandey PM (2016) Experimental investigation and statistical modeling of temperature rise in rotary ultrasonic bone drilling. Med Eng Phys 38:1330–1338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2016.08.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gupta V, Pandey PM, Gupta RK, Mridha AR (2017) Rotary ultrasonic drilling on bone: A novel technique to put an end to thermal injury to bone. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H J Eng Med 231:189–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954411916688500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Agarwal R, Gupta V, Singh J (2022) A novel drill bit design for reducing bone-chip morphology in orthopaedic bone drilling. In: Materials today: proceedings. Elsevier Ltd, pp 2–7

  36. Alam K, Mitrofanov AV, Silberschmidt VV (2009) Measurements of surface roughness in conventional and ultrasonically assisted bone drilling. Am J Biomed Sci 1:312–320. https://doi.org/10.5099/aj090400312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Singh RP, Pandey PM, Behera C (2020) Effects of rotary ultrasonic bone drilling on cutting force and temperature in the human bones. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H J Eng Med 234:829–842. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954411920925254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Moayedi H, Foong LK, Nguyen H (2020) Soft computing method for predicting pressure drop reduction in crude oil pipelines based on machine learning methods. J Brazilian Soc Mech Sci Eng 42:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-020-02613-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ahmad F, Mat Isa NA, Hussain Z et al (2015) A GA-based feature selection and parameter optimization of an ANN in diagnosing breast cancer. Pattern Anal Appl 18:861–870. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10044-014-0375-9

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang F, O’Donnell LJ (2019) Support vector regression. In: Machine learning: methods and applications to brain disorders. Elsevier Inc., pp 123–140

  41. Navarro D (2013) Learning statistics with R: A tutorial for psychology students and other beginners: Version 0.5. In: Lulu press. pp 303–325

  42. Dangeti P (2017) Parallelism of statistics and machine learning. In: Statistics for machine learning. Packt Publishing, pp 55–82

  43. Chen Y, Cheng A, Zhang C et al (2021) Rapid mechanical evaluation of the engine hood based on machine learning. J Brazilian Soc Mech Sci Eng 43:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-021-03070-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The present work is financially supported by TIET SEED money grant TU/DORSP/57/7254.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vishal Gupta.

Ethics declarations

Competing interest

None declared.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Zilda de Castro Silveira.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Agarwal, R., Singh, J. & Gupta, V. An intelligent approach to predict thermal injuries during orthopaedic bone drilling using machine learning. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 44, 320 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-022-03630-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-022-03630-8

Keywords

Navigation