Log in

Analysis of Reports on Adverse Drug Reactions Related to Herbal Medicinal Products and Herbal Supplements in the Netherlands Received by the National Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Drug Safety Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The inclusion of herbal medicinal products and herbal supplements in pharmacovigilance systems is important because a systematic approach of collecting and analyzing adverse drug reactions related to these products will help practitioners, patients, and regulators to gain more knowledge and prevent harm.

Objective

We aimed to categorize the adverse drug reaction reports on herbal medicinal products and herbal supplements submitted to the Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb between 1991 and February 2021 on the basis of their regulatory status, herbs included, and adverse drug reactions involved.

Methods

We categorized products on the basis of their registration status and herbal ingredients. The products were then categorized according to the Herbal Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification System. We used descriptive statistics in Microsoft Excel 2019. Pivot tables were used for the analysis and presentation of the data.

Results

Until February 2021, a total of 789 reports of herbal medicinal products and herbal supplements were received by Lareb. In these reports, a total of 823 herbal products were labeled as suspect. These products caused a total of 1727 adverse drug reactions. Of the 823 products, 229 were registered as a medicine, and 594 were on the market as a herbal supplement. Of the 823 herbal products, 522 reports concerned single-herb products, 256 reports concerned combination products, 27 reports concerned vitamin products containing herbal ingredients, and 18 reports concerned product issues. Approximately 15% of reports concerned serious adverse drug reactions, and adulterated products harbored a high risk of causing serious adverse drug reactions.

Conclusions

Analysis of the herbal medicinal products and herbal supplements in the Dutch pharmacovigilance database revealed a variety of suspected herbal ingredients. The reports provide insight into the variety of herbal products used in the Netherlands and the adverse reactions associated with their use. Pharmacovigilance of herbal products is essential to ensure their safe use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Thailand)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ekor M. The growing use of herbal medicines: issues relating to adverse reactions and challenges in monitoring safety. Front Pharmacol. 2014;4:177. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2013.00177.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. European Medicines Agency (EMA). Herbal medicinal products; 2020. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-regulatory/herbal-medicinal-products. Accessed 11 Nov 2021.

  3. Borg JJ, Laslop A, Pani L, Maciulaitis R, Melchiorri D. Reflections on decisions made on the well-established use of medicinal products by EU regulators and the ECJ. Sci Pharm. 2014;82(3):541–54. https://doi.org/10.3797/scipharm.1402-14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. van Galen E. Traditional herbal medicines worldwide, from reappraisal to assessment in Europe. J Ethnopharmacol. 2014;158 Pt B:498–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2014.07.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kroes BH. The legal framework governing the quality of (traditional) herbal medicinal products in the European Union. J Ethnopharmacol. 2014;158 Pt B:449–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2014.07.044.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. de Boer A, Geboers L, van de Koppel S, van Hunsel F. Nutrivigilance: reporting adverse events of non-registered products in the Netherlands. Curr Dev Nutr. 2021;5(Suppl 2):1265. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzab056_003.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Calapai G. European legislation on herbal medicines: a look into the future. Drug Saf. 2008;31(5):428–31. https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-200831050-00009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rijksoverheid. Warenwetbesluit algemene productveiligheid; 1993. https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0006158/2020-06-09. Accessed 11 May 2022.

  9. Netherlands Enterprise Agency. Commodities Act; 2022. Accessed 25 Mar 2022.

  10. Snyder FJ, Dundas ML, Kirkpatrick C, Neill KS. Use and safety perceptions regarding herbal supplements: a study of older persons in southeast Idaho. J Nutr Elder. 2009;28(1):81–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639360802634043.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tengku Mohamad TAS, Islahudin F, Jasamai M, Jamal JA. Preference, perception and predictors of herbal medicine use among Malay women in Malaysia. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019;13:1829–37. https://doi.org/10.2147/ppa.S227780.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Barnes J. Pharmacovigilance of herbal medicines: a UK perspective. Drug Saf. 2003;26(12):829–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Menniti-Ippolito F, Mazzanti G, Santuccio C, Moro PA, Calapai G, Firenzuoli F, et al. Surveillance of suspected adverse reactions to natural health products in Italy. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008;17(6):626–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.1566.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board. SmPC Hypericum perforatum Laif®; 2022. https://www.geneesmiddeleninformatiebank.nl/smpc/h103963_smpc.pdf. Accessed 25 Mar 2022.

  15. ICH guideline E2B (R3) on electronic transmission of individual case safety reports (ICSRs): data elements and message specification: implementation guide European Medicines Agency; 2013. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/international-conference-harmonisation-technical-requirements-registration-pharmaceuticals-human-use_en-4.pdf. Accessed 11 May 2022.

  16. Z Index. About Z-index; 2018. https://www.z-indexnl/english. Accessed 11 May 2022.

  17. Hunsel F, Skalli S. Chapter 9. Coding reports involving herbal medicines in a pharmacovigilance database. In: Jo Barnes, editor. Pharmacovigilance of herbal medicines. Springer; 2022 (in press).

  18. The International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. Welcome to MedDRA; 2021. https://www.meddra.org/. Accessed 11 May 2022.

  19. CIOMS Working Group VIII. Practical aspects of signal detection in pharmacovigilance: report of CIOMS Working Group VIII. Report No.: 9290360828, Geneva; 2010.

  20. Farah MH, Edwards R, Lindquist M, Leon C, Shaw D. International monitoring of adverse health effects associated with herbal medicines. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2000;9(2):105–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1557(200003/04)9:2%3c105::AID-PDS486%3e3.0.CO;2-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. The Herbal Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification System. Uppsala Monitoring Centre. https://www.who-umc.org/whodrug/whodrug-portfolio/whodrug-global/herbal-atc/. Accessed 1 May 2021.

  22. European Medicines Agency (EMA). European Union monographs and list entries; 2022. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-regulatory/herbal-products/european-union-monographs-list-entries#:~:text=A%20European%20Union%20(EU)%20herbal,preparations%20intended%20for%20medicinal%20use. Accessed 25 Mar 2022.

  23. Jeurissen SMF, Buurma-Rethans EJM, Beukers MH, Jansen-van der Vliet M, van Rossum CTM, Sprong RC. Consumption of plant food supplements in the Netherlands. Food Funct. 2018;9(1):179–90. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6fo01174h.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. van Hunsel F, Venhuis BJ, Keizers PH, Kant A. A “natural” weight loss product containing sibutramine. Drug Test Anal. 2016;8(3–4):311–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.1925.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. van Hunsel F, van Grootheest K. Adverse drug reactions of a slimming product contaminated with sibutramine. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2011;155(42):A3695.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim M, Woo Y, Han C-H. Current status of the spontaneous reporting and classification/coding system for herbal and traditional medicine in pharmacovigilance. Integr Med Res. 2021;10(1): 100467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2020.100467.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. de Vries ST, Denig P, Ekhart C, Burgers JS, Kleefstra N, Mol PGM, et al. Sex differences in adverse drug reactions reported to the National Pharmacovigilance Centre in the Netherlands: an explorative observational study. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019;85(7):1507–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.13923.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang Y, Leach MJ, Hall H, Sundberg T, Ward L, Sibbritt D, et al. Differences between male and female consumers of complementary and alternative medicine in a national US population: a secondary analysis of 2012 NIHS data. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2015;2015: 413173. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/413173.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Rhee TG, Harris IM. Gender differences in the use of complementary and alternative medicine and their association with moderate mental distress in U.S. adults with migraines/severe headaches. Headache. 2017;57(1):97–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/head.12986.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Stjernberg L, Berglund J, Halling A. Age and gender effect on the use of herbal medicine products and food supplements among the elderly. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2006;24(1):50–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/02813130500475522.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. van Hunsel F, Harmark L, Rolfes L. Fifteen years of patient reporting: what have we learned and where are we heading to? Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2019;18(6):477–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2019.1613373.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Walji R, Boon H, Barnes J, Austin Z, Welsh S, Baker GR. Consumers of natural health products: natural-born pharmacovigilantes? BMC Complement Altern Med. 2010;10:8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-10-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Vlieger AM, van de Putte EM, Hoeksma H. The use of complementary and alternative medicine in children at a general paediatric clinic and parental reasons for use. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2006;150(11):625–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Dauncey EA, Irving JTW, Allkin R. A review of issues of nomenclature and taxonomy of Hypericum perforatum L. and Kew’s medicinal plant names services. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2019;71(1):4–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/jphp.12831.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Chen G, Sun W. The role of botanical gardens in scientific research, conservation, and citizen science. Plant Divers. 2018;40(4):181–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pld.2018.07.006.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Venhuis BJ, van Hunsel F, van de Koppel S, Keizers PH, Jeurissen SM, De Kaste D. Pharmacologically effective red yeast rice preparations marketed as dietary supplements illustrated by a case report. Drug Test Anal. 2016;8(3–4):315–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.1929.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. van Hunsel FP, van Grootheest AC. Adverse reactions to herbal remedies: analysis of reported adverse reactions in the Netherlands. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2013;157(47):A6615.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Vrolijk MF, van de Koppel S, van Hunsel F. Red yeast rice (Monascus purpureus) supplements: case series assessment of spontaneously reported cases to The Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021;87(4):2146–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.14599.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. van Hunsel F, van de Koppel S, van Puijenbroek E. Post-menopausal vaginal hemorrhage related to the use of a hop-containing phytotherapeutic product. Drug Saf Case Rep. 2015;2(1):14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40800-015-0016-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. van Hunsel FP, Kampschöer P. Postmenopausal bleeding and dietary supplements: a possible causal relationship with hop- and soy-containing preparations. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2012;156(41):A5095.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. de Boer A, van Hunsel F, Bast A. Adverse food-drug interactions. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015;73(3):859–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.10.009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. van de Meerendonk HW, van Hunsel FP, van der Wiel HE. Autoimmune hepatitis induced by Actaea racemosa: side affects of an herb extract. NedTijdschr Geneeskd. 2009;153(6):246–9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florence P. A. M. van Hunsel.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No funding was received for the preparation of this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this study. Florence P.A.M. van Hunsel is a member of the ISoP Special Interest Group on Herbal and Traditional Medicines. This study was presented as a poster at the Annual ISoP Meeting 2021.

Ethics approval

Ethics approval was not needed for this study.

Consent to participate

No approval or consent was needed for this study.

Consent for publication

No approval or consent was needed for this study.

Availability of data and material

The datasets for this manuscript are not publicly available because of the Lareb data-protection policy. Requests to access the datasets should be directed to the first author and will be granted on reasonable request.

Code availability

The SQL statements for the data used in this article are not publicly available because of the Lareb data-protection policy. Requests to access the datasets should be directed to the first author and will be granted on reasonable request.

Author contributions

The original study protocol was designed by all authors. The dataset was established by DK with the help of SK. Data analysis was performed by DK with input from the other authors. The design of the manuscript was determined by all authors. All authors contributed to the final data analysis and to manuscript drafting and revision. All authors approved the final version to be published and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (XLSX 92 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

van Hunsel, F.P.A.M., van der Kooi, D., van de Koppel, S. et al. Analysis of Reports on Adverse Drug Reactions Related to Herbal Medicinal Products and Herbal Supplements in the Netherlands Received by the National Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb. Drug Saf 45, 651–661 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-022-01180-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-022-01180-5

Navigation