Abstract
The Monte Carlo (MC) technique, widely recognized as one of the most reliable methods for simulating radiation transport, is commonly employed in radiotherapy. An MC-based simulation softwares such as GEANT4, require a certain level of programing knowledge due to its complex structure. Through the visual interface we have developed, the Varian TrueBeam STx machine used in radiotherapy treatments can be easily utilized in GEANT4 calculations for the treatment quality assurance (QA). Following the geometric modeling and validation of the Varian TrueBeam STx for GEANT4, a graphical user interface (GUI) was designed that allows the use of various parameters of the simulation model by providing user-defined inputs. During the interface design, the QT framework was employed for the GUI, while the coding section involved the use of Python and C + + programing languages. The visual interface enables the dynamic transfer of optional simulation information, generated either through user input or obtained from the Varian Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS) to the simulation model. This allows the execution of the GEANT4 simulation. The usage of simulation parameters available in the GUI and the transfer of these parameters to the GEANT4 were tested on CentOS (7), Ubuntu (20.04.6 LTS), Mint (20.3 Una), and MacOS (14.2.1 Sonoma) operating systems. The visual interface of the Varian TrueBeam STx has been introduced as a user-friendly visual interface for medical physicists aiming to perform MC studies using the Varian TrueBeam STx. It is designed for ease of use and shows promise as a third-party quality assurance add-on for clinical applications of radiation therapy.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40042-024-01048-0/MediaObjects/40042_2024_1048_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40042-024-01048-0/MediaObjects/40042_2024_1048_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40042-024-01048-0/MediaObjects/40042_2024_1048_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40042-024-01048-0/MediaObjects/40042_2024_1048_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40042-024-01048-0/MediaObjects/40042_2024_1048_Fig5_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40042-024-01048-0/MediaObjects/40042_2024_1048_Fig6_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40042-024-01048-0/MediaObjects/40042_2024_1048_Fig7_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
N. Papanikolaou, S. Stathakis, Med. Phys. 36, 4765 (2009)
D.W.O. Rogers, Phys. Med. Biol. 51, 287 (2006)
P. Hyojun, H. Paganetti, J. Schuemann et al., Phys. Med. Biol. 66, 18 (2021)
S. Agostinelli, J. Allison, K. Amako et al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. 506, 250 (2003)
L. Grevillot, T. Frisson, D. Maneval et al., Phys. Med. Biol. 56, 903 (2011)
M. Constantin, J. Perl, T. LoSasso et al., Med. Phys. 38, 4018 (2011)
A.U. Khan, E.A. Simiele, R. Lotey et al., Med. Phys. 48, 1967 (2021)
G.B. Aybars, G. Sisman, K. Akgungor, Rev. Mex. Fis. 68, 051101 (2022)
P. Galanakou, S. String, C. Shang et al., Radiat. Phys. Chem. 208, 110904 (2023)
R. Kandemir, I. Ozsoykal, K. Akgungor, PJMPE 29, 42 (2023)
J.C.L. Chow, M.K.K. Leung, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 102, 012003 (2008)
M. Rodriguez, J. Sempau, L. Brualla, Strahlenther. Onkol. 189, 881 (2013)
R. Capote, R. Jeraj, C.M. Ma et al., International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in 12–14 December 2005 (2006)
J. Sempau, A. Sánchez-Reyes, F. Salvat et al., Phys. Med. Biol. 46, 1163 (2001)
E. Alhakeem, S. Zavgorodni, Phys. Med. Biol. 63, 01NT03 (2018)
C.M. Poole, I. Cornelius, J.V. Trapp, C.M. Langton, Australas. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med. 35, 329 (2012)
D.A. Low, W.B. Harms, S. Mutic, J.A. Purdy, Med. Phys. 25, 656 (1998)
MATLAB, https://mathworks.com/products/new_products/release2020b.html. Accessed 19 Dec 2023
M. Rodriguez, J. Sempau, A. Fogliata et al., Phys. Med. Biol. 60, 219 (2015)
E. Gete, C. Duzenli, M.P. Milette et al., Med. Phys. 40, 21707 (2013)
M.F. Belosi, M. Rodriguez, A. Fogliata et al., Med. Phys. 41, 51707 (2014)
Funding
There are no funding to declare for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The Varian TrueBeam STx and ionization chambers used in this study were provided by the Radiation Oncology Department, Dokuz Eylül University. The Varian Medical System allows the use of mechanic (drawings of the machine components) and dosimetric (phase spaces of the photon beams) information for the Varian TrueBeam STx. Without these supports, this study would not have been conducted. There are no conflicts of interest to declare for this study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ayrancioglu, O., Akgungor, K. A novel approach to quality assurance of radiation treatments with a visual interface of GEANT4 for Varian TrueBeam STx. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 84, 799–811 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40042-024-01048-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40042-024-01048-0