Log in

Primärer Endpunkt: nicht signifikant

Stärken und Grenzen randomisierter Studien zur Lipidtherapie

  • Schwerpunkt_Lipidologie
  • Published:
CardioVasc Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Zunehmend enden Interventionsstudien zu wesentlichen therapeutischen Fragestellungen mit einem nicht signifikanten Ergebnis für den primären Endpunkt. Das prägt auch das Bild der randomisierten Studien im Bereich der Lipidtherapie. Dies muss nicht an fehlender Wirksamkeit der Prüfsubstanz liegen. Vielmehr ist häufig die Studiendauer zu kurz für eine sich chronisch auswirkende Fettstoffwechselstörung. Das Dilemma wird noch dadurch akzentuiert, dass heute lediglich ein Zusatznutzen vor dem Hintergrund konventioneller Behandlungsmöglichkeiten geprüft werden kann. Damit gehen Therapieoptionen verloren und praktische Fragen bleiben unbeantwortet. Es stellt sich daher die Frage, ob und in wie weit auch Informationen aus Studien über den primären Endpunkt hinaus gewonnen werden können, selbst aus solchen, die als „negativ“ bewertet werden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1

Literatur

  1. Baigent C, Blackwell L, Emberson J et al. Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials. Lancet. 2010;376:1670–81

  2. Mihaylova B, Emberson J, Keech A et al. Statins for people at low risk of cardiovascular disease — Authors‘ reply. The Lancet. 2012;380:1817–1818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boekholdt SM, Hovingh GK, Mora Set al. Very low levels of atherogenic lipoproteins and the risk for cardiovascular events: a meta-analysis of statin trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 64:485–94

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. [No authors listed] ALLHAT Officers and Coordinators for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group. The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial. Major Outcomes in Moderately Hypercholesterolemic, Hypertensive Patients Randomized to Pravastatin vs Usual Care The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT-LLT) JAMA. 2002;288:2998-3007

  5. Wanner C, Krane V, März W et al. Atorvastatin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Undergoing Hemodialysis. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:238–248

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Knopp RH, d‘Emden M, Smilde JG, Pocock SJ. Efficacy and safety of atorvastatin in the prevention of cardiovascular end points in subjects with type 2 diabetes: the Atorvastatin Study for Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease Endpoints in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (ASPEN). Diabetes Care. 2006;29:1478–85

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fellström BC, Jardine AG, Schmieder RE et al. Rosuvastatin and Cardiovascular Events in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1395–1407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Keech A, Simes RJ, Barter P et al. Effects of long-term fenfibrate therapy on cardiovascular events in 9795 people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (the FIELD study): randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;366:1849–61

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ginsberg HN, Elam MB, Lovato LC et al. Effects of combination lipid therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1563–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Boden WE, Probstfield JL, Anderson T et al. Niacin in patients with low HDL cholesterol levels receiving intensive statin therapy. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:2255–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Landray MJ, Haynes R, Hopewell JC et al. Effects of extended-release niacin with laropiprant in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:203–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Landray MJ, Haynes R, Hopewell JC et al. Effects of extended-release niacin with laropiprant in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:203–12

  13. Schwartz GG, Olsson AG, Abt M et al. Effects of dalcetrapib in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:2089–99

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Baigent C, Keech A, Kearney PM et al. Efficacy and safety of cholesterol- lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins. Lancet. 2005;366:1267–78

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Frick MH, Elo O, Haapa K et al. Helsinki Heart Study: Primary-Prevention Trial with Gemfibrozil in Middle-Aged Men with Dyslipidemia. N Engl J Med. 1987;317:1237–1245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rubins HB, Robins SJ, Collins D et al. Gemfibrozil for the Secondary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease in Men with Low Levels of High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:410–418

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kannel WB. High-density lipoproteins: Epidemiologic profile and risks of coronary artery disease. Amer J Cardiol. 1983;52:9b–12b

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sacks FM; Expert Group on HDL Cholesterol. The role of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol in the Prevention and Treatment of Coronary Heart Disease: Expert Group Recommendations. Amer J Cardiol. 2002; 90:139–143

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cullen P, Schulte H, Assmann G. The Münster Heart Study (PROCAM): total mortality in middle-aged men is increased at low total and LDL cholesterol concentrations in smokers but not in nonsmokers. Circulation. 1997;96:2128–36

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Di Angelantonio E, Sarwar N, Perry P et al. Major lipids, apolipoproteins, and risk of vascular disease. JAMA. 2009;302:1993–2000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. [No authors listed] Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study. Lancet. 1994;344:1383-9

  22. [no authors listed] Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group. MRC/ BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20 536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebocontrolled trial. Lancet. 2002;360:7-22

  23. Ridker PM, Danielson E, Fonseca FA et al. Rosuvastatin to Prevent Vascular Events in Men and Women with Elevated C-Reactive Protein. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2195–2207

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Versmissen J, Oosterveer DM, Yazdanpanah M et al. Efficacy of statins in familial hypercholesterolaemia: a long term cohort study. BMJ. 2008;337:a2423

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Shepherd J, Cobbe SM, Ford I et al. Prevention of coronary heart disease with pravastatin in men with hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1301–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. [No authors listed] Prevention of cardiovascular events and death with pravastatin in patients with coronary heart disease and a broad range of initial cholesterol levels. The Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease (LIPID) Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1349-1357

  27. Ford I, Murray H, Packard CJ et al. Long-Term Follow-up of the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1477–1486

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Taylor F, Ward K, Moore TH et al. Statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jan 19;(1):CD004816. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004816.pub4

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tonelli M, Lloyd A, Clement F et al. Efficacy of statins for primary prevention in people at low cardiovascular risk: a meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2011;183: E1189–1202

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pedersen TR, Faergeman O, Kastelein JJ et al. High-dose atorvastatin vs usual-dose simvastatin for secondary prevention after myocardial infarction: the IDEAL study: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005;294:2437–45

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Colhoun HM, Betteridge DJ, Durrington PN et al. Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with atorvastatin in type 2 diabetes in the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS): multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;364:685–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerald Klose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Windler, E., Klose, G., Parhofer, K.G. et al. Stärken und Grenzen randomisierter Studien zur Lipidtherapie. CV 14, 45–50 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s15027-014-0520-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s15027-014-0520-9

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation