Log in

Optimization of ceramic membrane fabricated from coal flyash blended with natural clay for separation of kraft lignin from aqueous solutions

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, coal flyash mixed with natural clay is used as a precursor for the fabrication of ceramic membranes by the uniaxial compaction method for the separation of kraft lignin (M.W. 10,000 g/mol). Different compositions of flyash (70–50%) and natural clay (25–45%) were used along with 5% of fixed inorganic materials for the synthesis of membranes. TGA results exhibited the high thermal stability of the membranes. FTIR analysis confirmed the presence of silica and alumina in the membrane. XRD peaks showed the crystalline nature and availability of metal oxide due to the flyash and clay material. SEM and AFM images depicted the porous nature and rough surface of the ceramic membranes. The average pore radius of the fabricated membrane increased from 12 to 30 nm with an increase in clay composition. The flux of the membrane increased from 3.54 to 4.07 × 10−6 m3/m2 s while increasing the clay composition. BET analysis also showed the increase of average pore radius and pore volume from 14.99 to 21.39 nm and 3.12 to 7.62 × 10−3 cm3/g, respectively. The contact angle expanded from 11.8 to 21.56° which supports the impact of clay for better permeability. All the membrane compositions showed better corrosion resistance and negative zeta potential due to the major silica composition of flyash. The separation efficiency of lignin decreased from 76 to 70% with a decrease in flyash amount. The optimum composition of flyash and clay was 60:35 to achieve a better recovery (76.12%) of lignin and higher permeability (6.95 × 10−9 m3/m2 s kPa) of the membrane. Hence, the flyash-clay-based ultrafiltration membrane synthesized in this study can be used for the recovery of lignin biomass from biorefinery effluent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The required data will be made available on request.

References

  1. Patel R, Dhar P, Babaei-Ghazvini A, NikkhahDafchahi M, Acharya B (2023) Transforming lignin into renewable fuels, chemicals, and materials: a review. Bioresour Technol Rep 22:101463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2023.101463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wu Z, Jiang Y, Wang X, Xu J, Hu L (2023) A review on the separation of lignin depolymerized products. Biomass Convers Biorefin 13:16667–16683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-02266-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brienza F, Cannella D, Montesdeoca D, Cybulska I, Debecker DP (2023) A guide to lignin valorization in biorefineries: traditional, recent, and forthcoming approaches to convert raw lignocellulose into valuable materials and chemicals. RSC Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3su00140g

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Garlapati VK, Chandel AK, Kumar SPJ, Sharma S, Sevda S, Ingle AP, Pant D (2020) Circular economy aspects of lignin: towards a lignocellulose biorefinery. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 130:109977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tanis MH, Wallberg O, Galbe M, Al-Rudainy B (2024) Lignin extraction by using two-step fractionation: a review. Molecules 29:1. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29010098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Budnyak TM, Piątek J, Pylypchuk IV, Klimpel M, Sevastyanova O, Lindström ME, Gun’ko VM, Slabon A (2020) Membrane-filtered kraft lignin–silica hybrids as bio-based sorbents for cobalt(II) ion recycling. ACS Omega 5:10847–10856. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c00492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Radoor S, Karayil J, Jayakumar A, Siengchin S (2024) Efficient removal of dyes, heavy metals and oil-water from wastewater using electrospun nanofiber membranes: a review. J Water Process Eng 59:104983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.104983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen YL, Lo CC, Liu YL, Sun YM (2023) Lignin extraction and fractionation from rice straw biorefinery residues. Sep Purif Technol 326:124778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2023.124778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Manorma IF, Alves P, Gil MH, Gando-Ferreira LM (2021) Lignin separation from black liquor by mixed matrix polysulfone nanofiltration membrane filled with multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Sep Purif Technol 260:118231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.118231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sharma M, Alves P, Gando-Ferreira L (2023) Lignin recovery from black liquor using integrated UF/NF Processes and Economic Analysis. Membranes (Basel) 13:237. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13020237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Radoor S, Kandel DR, Park K, Jayakumar A, Karayil J, Lee J (2024) Low-cost and eco-friendly PVA/carrageenan membrane to efficiently remove cationic dyes from water: isotherms, kinetics, thermodynamics, and regeneration study. Chemosphere 350:140990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.140990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yogarathinam LT, Ismail AF, Goh PS, Gangasalam A (2020) Challenges of membrane technology in biorefineries. J Appl Membr Sci Technol 24:3. https://doi.org/10.11113/amst.v24n3.197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang H, Wang X, Wu Y, Wang S, Wu J, Fu P, Li Y (2023) Study of CFD-DEM on the impact of the rolling friction coefficient on deposition of lignin particles in a single ceramic membrane pore. Membranes (Basel) 13:4. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13040382

  14. Humpert D, Ebrahimi M, Stroh A, Czermak P (2019) Recovery of lignosulfonates from spent sulfite liquor using ceramic hollow-fiber membranes. Membranes (Basel) 9:4. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes9040045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jiang Q, Zhou J, Miao Y, Yang S, Zhou M, Zhong Z, **ng W (2020) Lower-temperature preparation of SiC ceramic membrane using zeolite residue as sintering aid for oil-in-water separation. J Memb Sci 610:118238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118238

  16. Hubadillah SK, Jamalludin MR, Dzarfan Othman MH, Iwamoto Y (2022) Recent progress on low-cost ceramic membrane for water and wastewater treatment. Ceram Int 48:24157–24191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.05.255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Goswami KP, Pugazhenthi G (2021) Effect of binder concentration on properties of low-cost fly ash-based tubular ceramic membrane and its application in separation of glycerol from biodiesel. J Clean Prod 319:128679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Xavier LA, Fetzer DEL, de Oliveira TV, Eiras D, Voll FAP, Vieira RB (2022) Effect of stainless-steel slag concentration in the fabrication of cost-effective ceramic membranes: seawater pre-treatment application. Ceram Int 48:23273–23283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.04.312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. El Azizi A, Bayoussef A, Bai C, Abou-salama M, Mansori M, Hakkou R, Loutou M (2023) Development of clayey ceramic membranes prepared with bio-based additives: application in water and textile wastewater treatment. Ceram Int 49:5776–5787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.10.094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Satyannarayana KVV, Sandhya Rani SL, Baranidharan S, Kumar RV (2022) Indigenous bentonite based tubular ceramic microfiltration membrane: elaboration, characterization, and evaluation of environmental impacts using life cycle techniques. Ceram Int 48:28843–28855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.03.156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Saini P, Bulasara VK, Reddy AS (2019) Performance of a new ceramic microfiltration membrane based on kaolin in textile industry wastewater treatment. Chem Eng Commun 206:227–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986445.2018.1482281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Malik N, Bulasara VK, Basu S (2020) Preparation of novel porous ceramic microfiltration membranes from fly ash, kaolin and dolomite mixtures. Ceram Int 46:6889–6898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.11.184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Luukkonen T, Olsen E, Turkki A, Muurinen E (2023) Ceramic-like membranes without sintering via alkali activation of metakaolin, blast furnace slag, or their mixture: characterization and cation-exchange properties. Ceram Int 49:10645–10651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.11.252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Suresh K, Pugazhenthi G (2017) Cross flow microfiltration of oil-water emulsions using clay based ceramic membrane support and TiO2 composite membrane. Egypt J Pet 26:679–694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpe.2016.10.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Moradihamedani P (2023) Recent development in polymer/montmorillonite clay mixed matrix membranes for gas separation: a short review. Polym Bull 80:4663–4687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-022-04266-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Singh P, Manikandan NA, Purnima M, Pakshirajan K, Pugazhenthi G (2020) Recovery of lignin from water and methanol using low-cost kaolin based tubular ceramic membrane. J Water Process Eng 38:101615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Huang J, Chen H, Yang J, Zhou T, Zhang H (2023) Effects of particle size on microstructure and mechanical strength of a fly ash based ceramic membrane. Ceram Int 49:15655–15664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.01.157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gupta V, Anandkumar J (2018) Protein separation using fly-ash microfiltration ceramic membrane. CSVTU Int J Biotechnol Bioinform Biomed 3:17–25. https://doi.org/10.30732/ijbbb.20180302002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Chathurappan R, Anandkumar J (2023) Synthesis and characterization of tubular ceramic ultrafiltration membrane from coal fly ash. Environ Qual Manage 00:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.21957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Gupta V, Anandkumar J (2019) Synthesis of crosslinked PVA-ceramic composite membrane for phenol removal from aqueous solution. J Serb Chem Soc 84:211–224. https://doi.org/10.2298/JSC180424083G

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chathurappan R, Jayapal A (2022) Synthesis and characterization of coal fly ash based multipurpose ultrafiltration membrane. Materialia (Oxf) 25:101548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtla.2022.101548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ardant D, Brumaud C, Perrot A, Habert G (2023) Robust clay binder for earth-based concrete. Cem Concr Res 172:107207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2023.107207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mousavi SS, Bhojaraju C, Ouellet-Plamondon C (2021) Clay as a sustainable binder for concrete—a review. Constr Mater 1:134–168. https://doi.org/10.3390/constrmater1030010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Harja M, Buema G, Bucur D (2022) Recent advances in removal of Congo red dye by adsorption using an industrial waste. Sci Rep 12:1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10093-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Radoor S, Karayil J, Jayakumar A, Nandi D, Parameswaranpillai J, Lee J, Shivanna JM, Nithya R, Siengchin S (2022) Adsorption of cationic dye onto ZSM-5 zeolite-based bio membrane: characterizations, kinetics and adsorption isotherm. J Polym Environ 30:8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-022-02421-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Radoor S, Karayil J, Jayakumar A, Kandel DR, Kim JT, Siengchin S, Lee J (2024) Recent advances in cellulose- and alginate-based hydrogels for water and wastewater treatment: a review. Carbohydr Polym 323:121339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.121339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Radoor S, Karayil J, Jayakumar A, Lee J, Nandi D, Parameswaranpillai J, Pant B, Siengchin S (2022) Efficient removal of organic dye from aqueous solution using hierarchical zeolite-based biomembrane: isotherm, kinetics, thermodynamics and recycling studies. Catalysts 12:8. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12080886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Servaes K, Varhimo A, Dubreuil M, Bulut M, Vandezande P, Siika-aho M, Sirviö J, Kruus K, Porto-Carrero W, Bongers B (2017) Purification and concentration of lignin from the spent liquor of the alkaline oxidation of woody biomass through membrane separation technology. Ind Crops Prod 106:86–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Abhishek Keshav Sharan Saxena: data generation, analysis of the data, interpretation of results and writing original draft. A.B. Soni: reviewing, suggestions and supervision. Anandkumar Jayapal: editing, reviewing, suggestions and supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anandkumar Jayapal.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saxena, A.K.S., Soni, A.B. & Jayapal, A. Optimization of ceramic membrane fabricated from coal flyash blended with natural clay for separation of kraft lignin from aqueous solutions. Biomass Conv. Bioref. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-024-05876-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-024-05876-9

Keywords

Navigation