Log in

Response to the comment on “pattern of recurrence and survival after D2 right colectomy for cancer: is there place for a routine more extended lymphadenectomy?”

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Updates in Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Palmeri M, Peri A, Pucci V et al (2022) Pattern of recurrence and survival after D2 right colectomy for cancer: is there place for a routine more extended lymphadenectomy? Updates Surg 74:1327–1335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-022-01317-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Piozzi GN, Khobragade K, Kim SH. Comment on Palmeri et al.'s (2022) pattern of recurrence and survival after D2 right colectomy for cancer: is there place for a routine more extended lymphadenectomy? Updates Surg 74(5):1791-1792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-022-01354-x.

  3. Hashiguchi Y, Muro K, Saito Y et al (2020) Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2019 for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 25:1–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-019-01485-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mazzarella G, Muttillo EM, Picardi B et al (2021) Complete mesocolic excision and D3 lymphadenectomy with central vascular ligation in right-sided colon cancer: a systematic review of postoperative outcomes, tumor recurrence and overall survival. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08529-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ow ZGW, Sim W, Nistala KRY et al (2021) Comparing complete mesocolic excision versus conventional colectomy for colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 47:732–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2020.09.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matteo Palmeri.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants and/or animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Institutional review board statement

The study was approved by ethics committee of “Area Vasta Nord Ovest (CEAVNO)”.

Informed consent statement

All patients signed an informed consent to authorize the scientific use of the collected data.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Palmeri, M., Peri, A. & Morelli, L. Response to the comment on “pattern of recurrence and survival after D2 right colectomy for cancer: is there place for a routine more extended lymphadenectomy?”. Updates Surg 75, 269–270 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-022-01423-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-022-01423-1

Navigation