SpringerLink
Log in

Comment on Palmeri et al.’s (2022) pattern of recurrence and survival after D2 right colectomy for cancer: is there place for a routine more extended lymphadenectomy?

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Updates in Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Palmeri M, Peri A, Pucci V, Furbetta N, Gallo V, Di Franco G et al (2022) Pattern of recurrence and survival after D2 right colectomy for cancer: is there place for a routine more extended lymphadenectomy? Updates Surg 74:1327–1335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chow CF, Kim SH (2014) Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision: west meets east. World J Gastroenterol 20:14301–14307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Strey CW, Wullstein C, Adamina M, Agha A, Aselmann H, Becker T et al (2018) Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with CME: standardization using the “critical view” concept. Surg Endosc 32:5021–5030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gao Z, Wang C, Cui Y, Shen Z, Jiang K, Shen D et al (2020) Efficacy and safety of complete mesocolic excision in patients with colon cancer: three-year results from a prospective, nonrandomized, double-blind controlled trial. Ann Surg 271:519–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Xu L, Su X, He Z, Zhang C, Lu J, Zhang G et al (2021) Short-term outcomes of complete mesocolic excision versus D2 dissection in patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy for right colon cancer (RELARC): a randomised, controlled, phase 3, superiority trial. Lancet Oncol 22:391–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, 73 Goryodae-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea

    Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi & Seon Hahn Kim

  2. HCG NCHRI Cancer Hospital, Nagpur, India

    Krunal Khobragade

Authors
  1. Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Krunal Khobragade
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Seon Hahn Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

GNP conceived the letter. GNP and KK wrote the manuscript. SHK revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seon Hahn Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

Human and animal rights

Not applicable.

Informed consent

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Piozzi, G.N., Khobragade, K. & Kim, S.H. Comment on Palmeri et al.’s (2022) pattern of recurrence and survival after D2 right colectomy for cancer: is there place for a routine more extended lymphadenectomy?. Updates Surg 74, 1791–1792 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-022-01354-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-022-01354-x

Search

Navigation