Log in

Experimental and analytical studies on Buckling-Restrained Knee Bracing systems with channel sections

  • Published:
International Journal of Steel Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, Buckling-Restrained Knee Bracing (BRKB) system was developed through sub-assemblage tests. The core plate of the BRKB was restrained with two channel sections. Tests of the five BRKBs were carried out under cyclic loading as specified in the AISC (2005) Seismic Provisions. It was observed that the ductility and energy dissipation capacity of the BRKBs were mainly affected by the variables: size of core plate, size of channel sections, and size of end plate. Four out of five specimens satisfied the compression-strength adjustment factor and cumulative plastic ductility specified in the provisions. The BRKB, which showed the best performance among the test specimens, was applied to a piloti type reinforced concrete building. Static pushover and non-linear time history analyses were performed to confirm the retrofit effect. The analysis results showed that the installation of the BRKBs improved the seismic behavior of the building significantly in terms of strength and story drift.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamson, N. (1992). “Non-stationary spectral matching.” Seismological Research Letters, 63(1), pp. 30–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • AISC (2005). Seismic provision for structural steel building. American Inst. of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristizabal-Ochoa, J. D. (1986). “Disposable knee bracing: improvement in seismic design of steel frames.” J. Struct. Engng, 112(7), pp. 1544–1552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balendra, T., Sam, M. T., and Liaw, C. Y. (1991). “Preliminary studies into the behaviour of knee braced frames subject to seismic loading.” Journal of Engineering structures, 13(1), pp. 67–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, C. J., Makris, N., and Aiken, I. D. (2004). “Component testing, seismic evaluation and characterization of buckling-restrained braces.” Journal of the Structural Engineering, 130(6), pp. 880–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charney, F. A. (1991). Correlation of the analytical and experimental inelastic response of 1/5 scale seven-story reinforced concrete frame-wall structure, Earthquake-Resistant Concrete Structures inelastic Response and Design. ACI Sp-127, American Concrete Institute, Detroit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, Y. and Kim, J. (2009). “Evaluation of seismic energy demand and its application on design of bucklingrestrained braced frames.” Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 31(1), pp. 93–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, P., Aiken, I., Kasai, K., Ko, E., and Kimura, I. (1999). “Design procedures for buildings incorporation hysteretic dam** devices.” Proc. the 69 th Annual Convention, SEAOC, Sacramento, USA, pp. 355–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elnashai, A. S., Papanikolaou, V., and Lee, D. (2001). ZeusNL — A program for inelastic dynamic analysis of structures. MAE Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahnestock, L. A., Sause, R., and Ricles, J. M. (2004). “Seismic response and performance of bucklingrestrained braced frames.” Journal of the Structural Engineering, 133(9), pp. 1195–1204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FEMA 450 (2003). NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures. Report No. FEMA-450, Washington, DC.

  • Hancock, J., Watson-Lamprey, J., Abrahamson, N. A., Bommer, J. J., Markatis, A., McCoy, E., and Mendis, R. (2006). “An improved method of matching response spectra of recorded earthquake ground motion using wavelets.” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 10, pp. 67–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horie, T. and Yabe, Y. (1993) “Elasto-plastic behavior of steel brace with restraint system for post buckling.” Annual Technical Papers of Steel Structures, 1, pp. 187–194, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • IBC (2009). International Building Code (IBC). International Code Council, Inc.

  • Jeong, S. and Elnashai, A. S. (2005). “Analytical assessment of an irregular RC frame for full-scale 3D pseudodynamic testing Part 1: Analytical model Verification.” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 9(1), pp. 95–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • KBC 2009 (2009). Korea building code 2009. Architectural Institute of Korea, Korea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., Choi, H., and Yu, J. (2009). “Seismic capacity and construction cost of apartment buildings with various spatial flexibility.” Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 25(1), pp. 65–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. and Seo, Y. (2003). “Seismic design of steel structures with buckling-restrained knee braces.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 59(2), 1477–1497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maheri, M. R. Kousari, R., and Razazan, M. (2003). “Pushover tests on steel X-braced and knee-braced RC frames.” Journal of Engineering structures, 25(13), pp. 1697–1705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehmet, E. and Cem, T. (2010). “An experimental study on steel-encased buckling-restrained brace hysteretic dampers.” Earthquake Engng. Struct. Dyn. 39(5), pp. 561–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orakcal, K., Massone, L. M., and Wallace, W. J. (2006). Analytical modeling of reinforced concrete walls for predicting flexural and coupled-shear-flexural response. Report No. PEER 2006/07, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otani, S., Kabeyasawa, T., Shiohara, H., and Aoyama, H. (1985). “Analysis of the full scale seven story reinforced concrete test structure.” American Concrete Institution, pp. 203–239.

  • Qiang, X. (2005). “State of the art of buckling-restrained braces in Asia.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 61(6), pp. 719–724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sam, M., Balendra, T., and Liaw, C. (1995). “Earthquakeresistant steel frames with energy dissipating knee elements.” Journal of Engineering Structures, 17(5), pp. 334–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SEAOC/AISC (2005). Recommended provisions for buckling-restrained braced frame, Structural Engineers Association of California/American Institute of Steel Construction.

  • SeismoSoft (2010). “SeismoMatch — A computer program for adjusting earthquake accelerograms to match a specific target response spectrum.” http://www.seismosoft.com.

  • Somerville, P., Smith, N., Puntamurthula, S., and Sun, J. (1997). Development of ground motion time histories for phase 2 of the FEMA/SAC steel project. SAC Background Document SAC/BD-97/04, SAC Joint Venture, Sacramento, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stafford Smith, B. and Girgis, A. (1984). “Simple analogous frames for shear wall analysis.” Journal of Structural Engineering, 110(11), pp. 2655–2666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suita, K., Inoue, K., Koetaka, Y., Ando, M., and Byakuno, Y. (2006). “Full-scale test on weld-free building structure with knee brace dampers.” International conference on behaviour of steel structures in seismic areas, Stessa 2006, pp. 533–540.

  • Takeuchi, T., Hajjar, J. F., Matsui, R., Nishimoto, K., and Aiken, I. D. (2010). “Local buckling restraint condition for core plates in buckling restrained braces.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 66(2), pp. 139–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay, R., Bolduc, P., Neville, R., and DeVall, R. (2006). “Seismic testing and performance of buckling restrained bracing systems.” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 33(2), pp. 183–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, K. C. and Weng, C. H. (2002). Experimental responses of double-tube unbonded brace elements and connections. Report No. CEER/R91-02, Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, National Taiwan University.

  • Watanabe, A., Hitomoi, Y., Saeki, E., Wada, A., and Fujimoto, M. (1988). “Properties of braced encased in buckling-restrained concrete and steel tube.” Proc. 9 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo/Kyoto, Japan, pp. 719–724.

  • Yoshino, T. and Karino, Y. (1971). “Experimental study on shear wall with braces: Part 2. Summaries of technical papers of annual meeting.” Architectural Institute of Japan, Structural Engineering Section, pp. 403–404.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kihak Lee.

Additional information

Note.-Discussion open until August 1, 2012. This manuscript for this paper was submitted for review and possible publication on December 15, 2011; approved on March 2, 2012.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shin, J., Lee, K., Jeong, SH. et al. Experimental and analytical studies on Buckling-Restrained Knee Bracing systems with channel sections. Int J Steel Struct 12, 93–106 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-012-1009-Y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-012-1009-Y

Keywords

Navigation