Correction to: Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-024-01778-8

In this article the wrong figures appeared as Figs. 4, 5, 6, 8 and 9; the figures should have appeared as shown below.

The incorrect Fig. 4 is given below.

figure a

Fig. 4 Casing blowdown effect on the annular pressure (left) and fluid exchange process (right)

The correct Fig. 4 is given below.

figure b

Fig. 4 Casing blowdown effect on the annular pressure (left) and fluid exchange process (right)

The incorrect Fig. 5 is given below.

figure c

Fig. 5 Effects of production shifts (left) and initial gas column (right) on annular pressure

The correct Fig. 5 is given below.

figure d

Fig. 5 Effects of production shifts (left) and initial gas column (right) on annular pressure

The incorrect Fig. 6 is given below.

figure e

Fig. 6 Annular pressure rise trend of two leakage channels (left) and its schematic diagram of fluid exchange between the annulus and tubing string (right)

The correct Fig. 6 is given below.

figure f

Fig. 6 Annular pressure rise trend of two leakage channels (left) and its schematic diagram of fluid exchange between the annulus and tubing string (right)

The incorrect Fig. 8 is given below.

figure g

Fig. 8 Wellbore pressure profiles and fluid swap diagrams before (left) and after (right) installation of the downhole choke with a partial gaseous annulus above the leak

The correct Fig. 8 is given below.

figure h

Fig. 8 Wellbore pressure profiles and fluid swap diagrams before (left) and after (right) installation of the downhole choke with a partial gaseous annulus above the leak

The incorrect Fig. 9 is given below.

figure i

Fig. 9 Pressure profile (left) and fluid exchange between the tubing string and annular space (right) after placing the downhole choke below the lower leak point

The correct Fig. 9 is given below.

figure j

Fig. 9 Pressure profile (left) and fluid exchange between the tubing string and annular space (right) after placing the downhole choke below the lower leak point

The original article has been corrected.