Log in

Prognostic Implications of Various Surgical Procedures and Postoperative Margin Status in Gastroesophageal Junction Tumors

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Esophagogastric junction (EGJ) carcinomas often require access to two compartments of the body for good margin and lymphadenectomy. Whether it is required to do so in all patients is debatable. We analyzed outcomes of patients who underwent surgeries for EGJ carcinomas in terms of margin status and survival. This is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of patients with EGJ adenocarcinomas operated between January 2014 and December 2016. Type of surgery performed and its impact on margin status and survival were assessed. Follow-up was for a minimum of 5 years. Ninety-four patients with EGJ carcinomas were operated on during the study period. Eight (8.51%) had involved proximal margin, and 2 of these had positive distal margin also. None had distal margin alone involved. Seventeen (18.09%) and 5 (5.32%) had a close proximal and distal margin, respectively. Radial margin was close/involved in 6 (6.38%) patients. Five-year overall survival and disease-free survival for the cohort was 38% and 30.8%, respectively. Proximal gastrectomy had a higher proximal margin positivity. Positive proximal or distal margin and a close/involved radial margin were detrimental to disease free survival and overall survival. Proximal gastrectomy is associated with a higher likelihood of proximal margin positivity. Positive margin leads to lower survival. Whether involvement of margins is just a surrogate marker of aggressive tumor or is an error in assessing extent tumor needs to be studied. Large-scale prospective studies in this regard are desirable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ferlay J, Ervik M, Lam F, Colombet M, Mery L, Piñeros M, Znaor A, Soerjomataram I, Bray F (2020) Global Cancer Observatory: Cancer Today. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France Available from: https://gco.iarc.fr/today, accessed [18 May 2023]

    Google Scholar 

  2. Factsheet (2020) National Cancer Registry Programme. ICMR-NCDIR, Bengaluru, India

    Google Scholar 

  3. Botterweck AA, Schouten LJ, Volovics A, Dorant E, van Den Brandt PA (2000) Trends in incidence of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and gastric cardia in ten European countries. Int J Epidemiol 29(4):645654. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/29.4.645 PubMed: 10922340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. He YT, Hou J, Chen ZF, Qiao CY, Song GH, Meng FS, ** HX, Chen C (2008) Trends in incidence of esophageal and gastric cardia cancer in high-risk areas in China. Eur J Cancer Prev 17(2):71–76. https://doi.org/10.1097/CEJ.0b013e3282b6fd97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ, Steyerberg EW, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Wijnhoven BP, Richel DJ, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Hospers GA, Bonenkamp JJ, Cuesta MA, Blaisse RJ, Busch OR, ten Kate FJ, Creemers GJ, Punt CJ, Plukker JT, Verheul HM, Spillenaar Bilgen EJ et al (2012) Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med 366(22):2074–2084. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1112088

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. von Rahden BH, Stein HJ, Siewert JR (2006) Surgical management of esophagogastric junction tumors. World J Gastroenterol 12(41):6608–6613. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v12.i41.6608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kurokawa Y, Sasako M, Sano T, Yoshikawa T, Iwasaki Y, Nashimoto A, Ito S, Kurita A, Mizusawa J, Nakamura K, Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG9502) (2015) Ten-year follow-up results of a randomized clinical trial comparing left thoracoabdominal and abdominal transhiatal approaches to total gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction or gastric cardia. Br J Surg 102(4):341–348. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9764

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Omloo JM, Lagarde SM, Hulscher JB, Reitsma JB, Fockens P, van Dekken H, Ten Kate FJ, Obertop H, Tilanus HW, van Lanschot JJ (2007) Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the mid/distal esophagus: Five-year survival of a randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 246(6):992–1000; discussion 1000–1001. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31815c4037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ito H, Clancy TE, Osteen RT, Swanson RS, Bueno R, Sugarbaker DJ, Ashley SW, Zinner MJ, Whang EE (2004) Adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia: what is the optimal surgical approach? J Am Coll Surg 199(6):88–886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.08.015 PubMed: 15555971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shen JG, Cheong JH, Hyung WJ, Kim J, Choi SH, Noh SH (2006) Influence of a microscopic positive proximal margin in the treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma of the cardia. World J Gastroenterol 12(24):3883–3886. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v12.i24.3883 PubMed: 16804975, PubMed Central: PMC4087938

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mira Sudam Wagh.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

This study was cleared by the institutional ethics committee (IEC); vide number 11/2019/04. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Consent to Participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study for retrospective usage of data related to them from our prospectively based database.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wagh, M.S., K, C., KP, A. et al. Prognostic Implications of Various Surgical Procedures and Postoperative Margin Status in Gastroesophageal Junction Tumors. Indian J Surg Oncol 15, 12–17 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-023-01821-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-023-01821-w

Keywords

Navigation