Abstract
Effective research propositions are key to advancing marketing theory and practice. However, our discipline provides little guidance on how to systematically craft impactful propositions. Consequently, scholars often refrain from including propositions in conceptual articles due to either a lack of knowledge or the confidence to do so. This proves detrimental to scholars looking to develop theory and conceptual papers. To address this challenge, our article defines research propositions and positions them within the broader set of the key building blocks of theory development. Based on an integrative framework that ties foundational premises, concepts, constructs, research propositions and hypothesis together, the article lays out four easy-to-follow actionable steps—grounding, crafting, connecting, and simplifying—that guide scholars in develo** effective research propositions. Further, the article proposes four criteria, i.e., clarity, consistency, conciseness, and contribution to theory advancement and scholarly research, to assist scholars in evaluating outcomes achieved when writing research propositions. The article concludes by offering an agenda for how key stakeholders involved, i.e., Ph.D. students, early career researchers and established marketing scholars, university research program directors and promotion and tenure (P&T) committees, as well as reviewers and journal editors, can contribute to advancing knowledge and skills of crafting effective research propositions as part of the broader goal to stimulate the innovation and growth of marketing theories in our discipline.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
“We use the word ‘empiricize’ similar to other words such as ‘conceptualize’ and ‘theorize’ to denote the process of forming/making/rendering something (in our case “to make or render empirical”).”
References
Alderson, W. (1957). Marketing Behavior and Executive Action. Irwin.
Bagozzi, R. P. (1984). A prospectus for theory construction in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 48(1), 11–29.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Phillips, L. W. (1982). Representing and testing organizational theories: A holistic construal. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(3), 459–489.
Bolton, R. N. (2020). First steps to creating high impact theory in marketing. AMS Review, 10(3), 172–178.
Brown, J. D. (1996). Testing in language programs. Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice Hall.
Cornelissen, J. (2017). Editor’s comments: Develo** propositions, a process model, or a typology? Addressing the Challenges of Writing Theory without a Boilerplate, Academy of Management Review, 42(1), 1–9.
Costner, H. L. (1969). Theory, deduction, and rules of correspondence. American Journal of Sociology, 75, 245–263.
Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research Design (Qualitative, Quantitative, & Mix Methods Approaches). SAGE Publications.
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct Validity in Psychological Tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302.
Edwards, J. R., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2000). On the nature and direction of relationships between constructs and measures. Psychological Methods, 5(2), 155–174.
Golder, P. N., Mitra, D., & Moorman, C. (2012). What is Quality? An Integrative Framework of Processes and States. Journal of Marketing, 76(4), 1–23.
Hunt, S. D. (1983). General Theories and the Fundamental Explananda of Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 47(4), 9–17.
Hunt, S. D. (2020). Indigenous theory development in marketing: The foundational premises approach. AMS Review, 10(1/2), 8–17.
Hunt, S. D., & Morgan, R. M. (1995). The Comparative Advantage Theory of Competition. Journal of Marketing, 59(2), 1–15.
Hunt, S. D., & Morgan, R. M. (1997). Resource-advantage theory: A snake swallowing its tail or a general theory of competition? Journal of Marketing, 61(4), 74–82.
Jaccard, J., & Jacoby, J. (2020). Theory construction and model-building skills: A practical guide for social scientists. Guilford publications.
Jarvis, C. B., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2003). A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 199–218.
Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57(3), 53–70.
Kerlinger, F. N., & Lee, H. B. (2000). Foundations of behavioral research (4th ed.). Harcourt College Publishers.
Kilduff, M. (2006). Editor’s comments: Publishing theory. The Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 252–255.
Kohli, A. K. (2009). From the Editor. Journal of Marketing, 73(1), 1–2.
Kohli, A. K. (2011). From the editor: Reflections on the review process. Journal of Marketing, 75(6), 1–4.
Kohli, A. K., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Factors Affecting the Study of Important Marketing Issues: Additional Thoughts and Clarifications. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 38(1), 29–31.
Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. (1990). Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 1–18.
Macdonald, E. K., Kleinaltenkamp, M. & Wilson, H. N. (2016). How business customers judge solutions: Solution quality and value in use. Journal of Marketing, 80(3), 96-120.
MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Jarvis, C. B. (2005). The Problem of Measurement Model Misspecification in Behavioral and Organizational Research and Some Recommended Solutions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 710–730.
Moorman, C., van Heerde, H. J., Moreau, C. P., & Palmatier, R. W. (2019). JM as a Marketplace of Ideas. Journal of Marketing, 83(1), 1–7.
Myers, J. L., Well, A., & Lorch, R. F. (2010). Research Design and Statistical Analysis. (3rd ed.) Routledge.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49(4), 12–40.
Payne, A. F., Frow, P., & Eggert, A. (2017). The customer value proposition: Evolution, development, and application in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(4), 467–489.
Rudner, R. S. (1966). Philosophy of social science. Prentice Hall.
Rust, R. T. (2006). From the Editor: The Maturation of Marketing as an Academic Discipline. Journal of Marketing, 70(3), 1–2.
Sajtos, L., & Magyar, B. (2016). Auxiliary theories as translation mechanisms for measurement model specification. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3186–3191.
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach. John Wiley & Sons.
Schwab, D.P. (1999). Research Methods for Organizational Studies. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates London.
Steenkamp, J.-B.E.M. (2018). The Future of the marketing department at business schools. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46(2), 169–172.
Steenkamp, J.-B.E.M., & Baumgartner, H. (2000). On the use of structural equation models for marketing modeling. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 17(2–3), 195–202.
Stremersch, S., Winer, R. S., & Camacho, N. A. (2021). Faculty Research Incentives and Business School Health: A New Perspective from and for Marketing, Available at SSRN 3741126
Tuli, K. R., Kohli, A. K., & Bharadwaj, S. G. (2007). Rethinking customer solutions: From product bundles to relational processes. Journal of Marketing, 71(3), 1–17.
Varadarajan, P. R. (1996). From the editor: Reflections on research and publishing. Journal of Marketing, 60(4), 3–6.
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a New Dominant Logic of Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2016). Institutions and Axioms: An Extension and Update of Service-Dominant Logic. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 5–23.
Yadav, M. S. (2010). The Decline of Conceptual Articles and Implications for Knowledge Development. Journal of Marketing, 74(1), 1–19.
Yadav, M. S. (2014). Enhancing theory development in marketing. AMS Review, 4, 1–4.
Zaltman, G. (2003). How customers think: Essential insights into the mind of the market. Harvard Business Press.
Zaltman, G., LeMasters, K., & Heffring, M. (1982). Theory Construction in Marketing. John Wiley and Sons Inc.
Zaltman, G., Pinson, C. R. A., & Angelmar, R. (1973). Metatheory and consumer research. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Zeithaml, V. A., Jaworski, B. J., Kohli, A. K., Tuli, K. R., Ulaga, W., & Zaltman, G. (2020). A Theories-in-Use Approach to Building Marketing Theory. Journal of Marketing, 84(1), 32–51.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ulaga, W., Kleinaltenkamp, M., Kashyap, V. et al. Advancing marketing theory and practice: guidelines for crafting research propositions. AMS Rev 11, 395–406 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-021-00215-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-021-00215-x