SpringerLink
Log in

Mediating Effect of Competitive Strategy Between Entrepreneur Characteristics and the Performance of Non-timber Forest Product SMEs in Kenya

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although entrepreneur characteristics and competitive strategy are dominant constructs within business studies, there is still no consensus about how they act jointly to influence firm performance. The paper, therefore, tries to expand the understanding of the joint and individual effects of entrepreneur characteristics and competitive strategy on firm performance in the context of resource-based view advancing that sustainable competitive advantage can be obtained by being in possession of strategically relevant resources and capabilities. The sample units are selected using stratified random sampling procedures and data collected by administering a questionnaire to 314 entrepreneurs dealing with non-timber forest products in Kenya. The data is analysed using multiple linear regression analyses. The results reveal that: (1) a significant relationship exists between entrepreneur characteristics and firm performance before the introduction of competitive strategy in the relationship; (2) a non-significant relationship prevails between entrepreneur characteristics and firm performance after the introduction of competitive strategy; (3) entrepreneur characteristics influence competitive strategy; and (4) competitive strategy influences firm performance. The observations meet conditions defined for mediating effect. It is concluded that the relationship between entrepreneur characteristics and firm performance is indirect and hidden requiring mediation of strategy. Thus, an integrated fit between the entrepreneur and strategy improves firm performance. The findings strengthen arguments advanced by the resource-based view that firms can obtain sustainable competitive advantage through their strategically relevant resources. The theoretical contribution of the study is the integrated approach and review of the multidimensional alignment of strategy with entrepreneur characteristics of education, skills and experience that depict the knowledge capital and entrepreneur’s age and gender to improve performance. The study provides entrepreneurs/managers with insights on the importance of aligning their strategies to resources possessed for better performance. It is important that entrepreneurs strengthen their knowledge capital to formulate and implement successful strategies for better performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Affes, W., & Affes, H. (2021). Business model and firm performance in Tunisian firms: A mediated moderation analysis. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021

  • Ahenkan, A., & Boon, E. (2011). Non-timber forest products: Clearing the confusion in semantics. Journal of Human Ecology, 33(1), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Ammary, J. (2014). The strategic alignment between knowledge management and information systems strategy: The impact of contextual and cultural factors. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 13(1), 1450006 (12 pgs)

  • Alexy, O., West, J., Klapper, H., & Reitzig, M. (2018). Surrendering control to gain advantage: Reconciling openness and the resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 39(6), 1704–1727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alkasim, S. B., Hilman, H., & Bohari, A. M. (2018). The mediating effect of competitive strategy on the relationship between market development, product development and performance of manufacturing based SMEs in Nigeria. Journal of the Academy of Business and Retail Management, 12(2), 133–143.

  • Analoui, F., & Karami, A. (2004). Strategic management in small and medium sized industries. UK: Thomson Learning.

  • Anderse´n, J. (2011). Strategic resources and firm performance. Management Decision, 49(1), 87–98. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd 0025–1747. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741111094455

  • Åstebro, T., Herz, H., Nanda, R., & Weber, R. A. (2014). Seeking the roots of entrepreneurship: Insights from behavioral economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(3), 49–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakoglu, R., Oncer, A. Z., Yıldız, M. L., & Gulluoglu, A. N. (2016). Strategy development process in higher education: The case of Marmara University. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235(2016), 36–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. (1997). Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage. Addison-Wesley publishing Company, Reading.

  • Barney, J. B. (2008). Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage. Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B., Ketchen, D. J., & Wright, M. (2011). The future of resource-based theory revitalization or decline? Journal of Management, 37(5), 1299–1315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begley, T. M., & Boyd, D. P. (1987). Psychological characteristics associated with performance in entrepreneurial firms and smaller businesses. Journal of Business VenturiNg, 2(1), 79–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budiati, Y., Untoro, W., Wahyudi, L., & Harsono, M. (2021). The mediating effect of strategy on entrepreneurial orientation and performance. Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRME

  • Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2009). Mode 3 and quadruple helix: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3/4), 201–234. https://www.inderscience.com/info/inarticletoc.php?jcode=ijtm&year=2009&vol=46&issue=3/4

  • Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2010). Triple helix, quadruple helix and quintuple helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other? A proposed framework for a trans-disciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 41–69. https://doi.org/10.4018/jsesd.2010010105

  • Carayannis, E. G., & Sipp, C. M. (2010). Why, when, and how are real options used in strategic technology venturing? Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1(2010), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-010-0011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E. G., Barth, T. D., & Campbell, D. F. (2012). The quintuple helix innovation model: Global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-5372-1-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2012). Mode 3 knowledge and Quadruple Helix: Toward a 21st fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal Technology Management, 46, 201–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E. G., Grigoroudis, E., Sindakis, S., & Walter, C. (2014). Business model innovation as antecedent of sustainable enterprise excellence and resilience. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 5(3), 440–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-014-0206-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E. G., & Rakhmatullin, R. (2014). The quadruple/quintuple innovation helixes and smart specialisation strategies for sustainable and inclusive growth in Europe and beyond. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 5(2), 212–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E., & Grigoroudis, E. (2016). Quadruple innovation helix and smart specialization: Knowledge production and national competitiveness. Foresight and STI Governance. https://doi.org/10.17323/1995-459x.2016.1.31.42

  • Castanias, R., & Helfat, C. (1991). Managerial resources and rents. Journal of Management, 17, 155–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, G., & Hanks, S. H. (1994). Market attractiveness, resource-based capabilities, venture strategies and venture performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 12(1), 27–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterji, A., & Patro, A. (2014). Dynamic capabilities and managing human capital. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(4), 395–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatzoglou, P. D., Diamantidis, A. D., Vraimaki, E., & Vranakis, S. K. (2011). Aligning IT, strategic orientation and organizational structure. Business Process Management Journal, 17(4), 663–687. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637151111149474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatzoglou, P., Chatzoudes, D., Sarigiannidis, L., & Theriou, G. (2018). The role of firm-specific factors in the strategy-performance relationship. Revisiting the resource-based view of the firm and the VRIO framework. Management Research Review, 41(1), 46–73.

  • Ciavarella, M. A., Buckholtz, A. K., Riordan, C. M., Gatewood, R. D., & Stokes, G. S. (2004). “The BIG FIVE and venture survival: Is there a linkage? Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 465–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Climent, R. C., & Haftor, D. M. (2021). Value creation through the evolution of business model themes. Journal of Business Research, 122(2021), 353–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conner, K. R., & Prahalad, C. (1996). A resource-based theory of the firm: Knowledge versus opportunism. Organization Science, 7(5), 477–501Dess, G. G. & Beard, D. (1984). Dimensions of organizational task environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(1), 52–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dess, G. G., & Robinson, J. R. B. (1984). Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit. Strategic Management Journal (pre-1986), 5(3), 265–273.

  • Dlamini, C. S. (2013). A protocol for community-based forest enterprises: The case of non-timber forest products. Journal of Horticulture and Forestry, 5(1), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dominic, T., & Theuvsen, L. (2015). Agribusiness firm resources and performance: The mediating role of strategic management practices. Global Food Discussion Papers. RTG 1666 Global Food, Heinrich Düker Weg 12. Göttingen, Germany.

  • Dubey, P. (2008). Investment in small-scale forestry enterprises: A strategic perspective for India. Small-Scale Forestry, 7(2), 117–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, L. F., Brush, C. G., & Manolova, T. (2002). The mediating role of strategy on small firm performance (Working Paper #2004–03). Prepared for submission: Journal of Business Venturing, April 2002.

  • França, A., & Ferreira, J. (2016). Resources and capabilities through the lens of value (co-) creation: A literature review. International Journal of Innovation Science, 8(3), 230–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, P. A., Tix, A. P., & Barron, K. E. (2004). Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 115–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritz, M. S., & Mackinnon, D. P. (2007). Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychological Science, 18(3), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01882.x.PMID:17444920;PMCID

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabrielsson, M., Seppala, T., & Gabrielsson, P. (2016). Realizing a hybrid competitive strategy and achieving superior financial performance while internationalizing in the high-technology market. Industrial Marketing Management, 54, 141–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsberg, A., & Buchholtz, A. (1989). Are entrepreneurs a breed apart? A look at the evidence. Journal of General Management, 15(2), 32–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/030630708901500203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gro¨ßler A. (2007). A dynamic view on strategic resources and capabilities applied to an example from the manufacturing strategy literature. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 18(3), 250–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guimaraes, T., & Armstrong, C. (1998). Empirically testing impact of change management effectiveness on company performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 1(2), 74–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (1984). Business unit strategy, managerial characteristics, and business unit effectiveness at strategy implementation. Academy of Management Journal, 27(1), 25–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashim, N. A. B., Raza, S., & Minai, M. S. (2018). Relationship between entrepreneurial competencies and small firm performance: Are dynamic capabilities the missing link? Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 17(2), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F. (2012). Process: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White Paper]. http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf

  • Hernández-Perlines, F., Moreno-García, J., & Yañez-Araque, B. (2016). The mediating role of competitive strategy in international entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 5383–5389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hmieleski, K., & Carr, J. (2008). The relationship between entrepreneur psychological capital and new venture performance. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 28(4), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilmudeen, A., & Bao, Y. (2020). IT strategy and business strategy mediate the effect of managing IT on firm performance: Empirical analysis. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 33(6), 1357–1378. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-03-2019-0068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islam, A., Khan, M. A., Obaidullah, A. Z. M., & Alam, M. S. (2011). Effect of entrepreneur and firm characteristics on the business success of small and medium enterprises in Bangladesh. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(3), 289–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jean-Charles, P. (2018). Business uncertainty, corporate decision and startups. Journal of Decision Systems, 27(1), 32–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2018.1460162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamasak, R. (2017). The contribution of tangible and intangible resources, and capabilities to a firm’s profitability and market performance. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 26(2), 252–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, R., & Verhoeven, W. (2002). Growth patterns of medium-sized, fast-growing firms. Scales Research Reports. EIM Business and Policy Research H200111, EIM Business and Policy Research.

  • Kerr, S. P., Kerr, W. R., & Xu, T. (2018). Personality traits of entrepreneurs: A review of recent literature. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 14(3), 279–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ketchen, D. J., Thomas, J. B., & McDaniel, R. R. (1996). Process, content and context: Synergistic effcts on organizational performance. Journal of Management, 22(2), 231–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kor Y., Y., & Mahoney J. T. (2004). Edith Penrose's (1959) contributions to the resource-based view of strategic management. Journal of Management Studies, 41(1), 183–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leutner, F., Ahmetoglu, G., Akhtar, R., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2014). The relationship between the entrepreneurial personality and the Big Five personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 63, 58–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linda, F. E., Candida, G. B., & Tatiana, M. (2005). Co-alignment in the resource–performance relationship: Strategy as mediator. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(3), 359–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linton, G., & Kask, J. (2017). Configurations of entrepreneurial orientation and competitive strategy for high performance. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.02

  • Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. The Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luoma, M. A. (2015). Revisiting the strategy-performance linkage: An application of an empirically derived typology of strategy content areas. Management Decision, 53(5), 1083–1106. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2014-0593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machuki, V., Aosa, E., & Letting, N. (2012). Firm-level institutions and performance of publicly quoted companies in Kenya. International Journal of Humanities & Social Science, 2(21), 298–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J. T., & Pandian, J. R. (1992). The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 13(5), 363–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maier, R., & Remus, U. (2002). Defining process-oriented knowledge management strategies. Knowledge and Process Management, 9(2), 103–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallinckrodt, B., Abraham, W. T., Wei, M., & Russell, D. W. (2006). Brief reports. Advances in testing the statistical significance of mediation effects. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(3), 372–378.

  • Marshall E., Schreckenberg, K., & Newton, A. C. (eds). (2006). Commercialization of non-timber forest products: Factors influencing success. Lessons learned from Mexico and Bolivia and policy implications for decision-makers.

  • Michalisin, M., Smith, R., & Kline, D. (1997). In search of strategic assets. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 5, 360–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C. (1978). Organization strategy, structure and process. McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (2015). A downside to the entrepreneurial personality? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(1), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohsenzadeha, M., & Ahmadia, S. (2016). The mediating role of competitive strategies in the effect of firm competencies and export performance. Procedia Economics and Finance, 36, 456–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. E., & Strong, C. A. (2003). Business performance and dimensions of strategic orientation. Journal of Business Research, 56(3), 163–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller, G. F., & Gappisch, C. (2005). Personality types of entrepreneurs. Psychological Reports, 96, 737–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, G. D., Trailer, J. W., & Hill, R. C. (1996). Measuring performance in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Research, 36, 15–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muzenda, A. (2014). A conceptual model of the determinants of performance of tourism sector small and medium enterprises (SMEs). International Journal of Business and Management, 3(1), 30–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Namusonge, M. J. (2014). Linking competencies with strategies: The case of small and medium- sized exporting firms in Kenya. International Journal of Social Sciences and Entrepreneurship, 1(11), 418–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nedeljković, J. (2019). Non-timber forest products (ntfps). In Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 W. Leal Filho et al. (eds.). Life on Land, Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71065-5_28-1

  • Newbert, S. L. (2008). Value, rareness, competitive advantage, and performance: A conceptual-level empirical investigation of the resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 29(7), 745–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonić, D., Avdibegović, M., & Nedeljković, J. (2014). Typology of non-wood forest products based enterprises in Serbia. Not Bot Horti Agrobot Cluj-Napoca. https://doi.org/10.1583/nbha4229725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phan, P. H., & Butler, J. E. (2003). Entrepreneurs’ attitudes, strategy choices, and firm performance. Journal of business and entrepreneurship, 15(1).

  • Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettenella, D., Secco, L., & Maso, D. (2007). NWFPS marketing: Lessons learned and new development paths from case studies in some European countries. Small-Scale Forestry, 6(2007), 373–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Peter Smith: Gloucester, MA.

  • Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauch, A. (2014). Predictions of entrepreneurial behavior: A personality approach. In E. Chell & M. Karatas-Ozkan (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Small Business and Entrepreneurship (pp. 165–183). Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauf, M. A. (2007). HRM sophistication and SME performance in Lahore, Pakistan, (Published Ph.D. Thesis). University of Twente.

  • Roberts, B. W., & Mroczek, D. (2008). Personality trait change in adulthood. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(1), 31–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00543.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saldanha, E. (2020). The mediation effects of business strategy on the relations between industrial competition and performance. Timor Leste Journal of Business and Management, 1(1), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarwoko, E. (2016). Growth strategy as a mediator of the relationship between entrepreneurial competencies and the performance of SMEs. Journal of Economics, Business, and Accountancy Ventura, 19(2), 219–226 219.

  • Schreckenberg, K., Marshall E., Newton, A., Willem te Velde, D., Rushton, J., & Edouard, F. (2006). Commercialization of non-timber forest products: What determines success? ODI. Forestry Briefing. Number 10, March 2006.

  • Shanley, P., Pierce, A., Laird, S., & Robinson, D. (2008). Beyond timber certification and management of non-timber forest products. http://www.proforest.net/publication-objects

  • Shigang, Y. (2010). Competitive strategy and business environment: The case of small enterprises in China. Asian Social Science, 6(11).

  • Sidek, S., Mohamad, M. R., & Wan, W. M. N. (2019). Entrepreneurial orientation and SME performance: The serial mediating effects of access to finance and competitive advantage. International Journal of Academic Research in Business & Social Sciences, 9(9), 81–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidik, I. G. (2012). Conceptual framework of factors affecting SME development: Mediating factors on the relationship of entrepreneur traits and SME performance. Procedia Economics and Finance, 4(2012), 373–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sniazhko, S. (2019). Uncertainty in decision-making: A review of the international business literature. Cogent Business & Management, 6(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2019.1650692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyman, R., & Kruger, C. J. (2004). The interdependency between strategic management and strategic knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(1), 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soewarno, N., & Tjahjadi, B. (2019). Mediating effect of strategy on competitive pressure, stakeholder pressure and strategic performance management (SPM): Evidence from HEIs in Indonesia. Benchmarking: An Int Journal, 27(6), 1743–1764. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-06

  • Spanos, Y. E., & Lioukas, S. (2001). An examination into the causal logic of rent generation: Contrasting porter’s competitive strategy framework and the resource-based perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 22(10), 907–934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, K. A., Baskerville, R., Storey, V. C., Senn, J. A., Raven, A., & Long, C. (2000). Confronting the assumptions underlying the management of knowledge: An agenda for understanding and investigating knowledge management. ACM SIGMIS Database, 31(4), 41–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subedi, B. P. (2003). Non-timber forest products sub-sector in Nepal: Opportunities and challenges for linking business with biodiversity conservation. The Nepal Journal of Forestry, XI, I(2), 18–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suoniemi, S., Terho, H., Zablah, A., Olkkonen, R., & Straub, D. W. (2021). The impact of firm-level and project-level it capabilities on CRM system quality and organizational productivity. Journal of Business Research, 127(2021), 108–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, C., & Smyrnios, K. (2011). How do Australian fast-growth small-to-medium enterprises measure performance? Journal of Enterprising Culture, 19(1), 41–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teach, R. D., & Schwartz, R. G. (2000). The congruence game: A team building game for entrepreneurs. Published in the ISAGA Proceedings.

  • Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teeratansirikool, L., Siengthai, S., Badir, Y., & Charoenngam, C. (2013). Competitive strategies and firm performance: The mediating role of performance measurement. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 62(2), 168–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, A., Peteraf, M., Gamble, J., & Strickland, A. J. (2015). Crafting & executing strategy: The quest for competitive advantage: Concepts and cases. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.

  • United of the Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (1995). Non-wood forest products for rural income and sustainable forestry. Non-wood Forest Products, 7.

  • Venkatraman, N. (1989). Strategic orientation of business enterprises: The construct, dimensionality, and measurement. Management Science, 35(8), 942–962.

  • Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. Academy of Management Review, 11, 801–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vliamos, S. J., & Tzeremes, N. G. (2012). Factors influencing entrepreneurial process and firm start-ups: Evidence from Central Greece. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3, 250–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-011-0043-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wekesa, L., Maalu, J. K., Gathungu, J., & Wainaina, G. (2016). Effect of entrepreneur characteristics on performance of non-timber forest products small and medium enterprises in Kenya. DBA Africa Management Review, 6(3), 16–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wekesa L., Maalu J., Gathungu J., & Wainaina G. (2021). Status and growth determinants of non-timber forest products firms in Kenya. East African Agricultural and Forestry Journal, 126–135.

  • Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171–180 Wilson, C. (2012). Strategic engagement and alignment of corporate talent. Development and Learning in Organizations, 26(5), 4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan-Yao, F., Wei-Hwa, P., Yueh-Chuen, H., & Yan-Kwang, C. (2009). The effect of firm’s resources and capabilities on its performance of ICT design industry in Taiwan. Information Technology Journal, 8(5), 688–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, D., & Bruning, E. (2011). Personal characteristics and strategic orientation: Entrepreneurs in Canadian manufacturing companies. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 17(1), 82–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zulkiffli, S., & Perera, N. (2011). A literature analysis on business performance for SMES - Subjective or objective measures?. 2011 SIBR Conference on Interdisciplinary Business and Economics Research, 1–9. Bangkok, Thailand.

  • Zulfiqar, S., Shah, A., & Ahmad, M. (2019). Entrepreneurial orientation and performance of small and medium-sized enterprises: Mediating effects of differentiation strategy. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 29(5), 551–571. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-06-2018-0038

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The study was funded by the Government of Kenya through Kenya Forestry Research Institute (KEFRI).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Coast Eco Region Research Programme, Kenya Forestry Research Institute, Malindi, Kenya

    Linus Chesoli Wekesa

  2. Department of Business Administration, School of Business, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya

    Jackson Maalu & James Gathungu

  3. Department of Management Science, School of Business, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya

    Gituro Wainaina

Authors
  1. Linus Chesoli Wekesa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jackson Maalu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. James Gathungu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gituro Wainaina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linus Chesoli Wekesa.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

All authors wish to declare that they have complied with all the ethical standards as it is required by the Journal of the Knowledge Economy.

Consent to Participate

The research was done without direct participation of human being or animals because it was purely a social research without direct involvement of people. The research also observed that the people studied would remain anonymous as their names or origins were not to be identified. These were the ethical issues that were observed during this research.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on University and Entrepreneurial Ecosystems

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wekesa, L.C., Maalu, J., Gathungu, J. et al. Mediating Effect of Competitive Strategy Between Entrepreneur Characteristics and the Performance of Non-timber Forest Product SMEs in Kenya. J Knowl Econ 14, 4293–4317 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-01044-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-01044-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation