Abstract
Surface electromyography is an important and widely used biomedical measurement technique. In biomedical engineering, obtaining high-quality EMG data and processing it in real-time is challenging. Their calibration repeatability and reliability, on the other hand, remain in discussion. Furthermore, the metrological elements of EMG systems have not yet been studied. In this research work, a portable EMG acquisition module has been developed, and the uncertainty of two EMG characteristics for four everyday hand motions has been investigated. Furthermore, an inter-instrument comparison has been carried out in a controlled environment. For multiple trials, the result has been estimated for 10 people. While designing the experiment, two major uncertainty factors, muscle selection/electrode placement and subjective analysis, have been taken into consideration. The developed system's inter-instrument performance has been found to be similar to that of the existing system (p-value > 0.05). The total uncertainty of the developed system has been found to be in the range of 0.0106–0.0196% (p-value > 0.05) for RMS and 0.1001–0.2084% (p-value > 0.05) for MF. The existing commercial system, in contrast, exhibited uncertainty in the range of 0.0171–0.0359% (p-value > 0.05) for RMS and 0.1010–0.2088% (p-value > 0.05) for MF. The developed EMG acquisition system's performance and cost-effectiveness validate its utility and acceptability for low-cost product development.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
R. Gupta and R. Agarwal, Continuous human locomotion identification for lower limb prosthesis control. CSI Trans. ICT, 6(1) (2018) 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40012-017-0178-4.
K. Veer, R. Agaral and R. Agarwal, Wavelet denoising and evaluation of electromyogram signal using statistical algorithm. Int. J. Biomed. Eng. Technol., 16(4) (2014) 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBET.2014.066223.
H.S. Ryait, A.S. Arora and R. Agarwal, Interpretations of wrist/grip operations from SEMG signals at different locations on arm. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst., 4(2) (2010) 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBCAS.2009.2037604.
A. Phinyomark, P. Phukpattaranont and C. Limsakul, Feature reduction and selection for EMG signal classification. Expert Syst. Appl., 39(8) (2012) 7420–7431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.102.
S.M. Khan, A.A. Khan and O. Farooq, Selection of features and classifiers for EMG-EEG-Based upper limb assistive devices—a review. IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng., 13 (2020) 248–260. https://doi.org/10.1109/RBME.2019.2950897.
P. Geethanjali and K.K. Ray, A Low-Cost Real-Time Research Platform for EMG Pattern Recognition-Based Prosthetic Hand. IEEE/ASME Trans. MECHATRONICS, 20(4) (2015) 1948–1955.
K. Veer, Interpretation of surface electromyograms to characterize arm movement. Instrum. Sci. Technol., 42(5) (2014) 513–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/10739149.2014.913178.
C. Castellini and P. Van Der Smagt, Surface EMG in advanced hand prosthetics. Biol. Cybern., 100(1) (2009) 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-008-0278-1.
W. Guo, X. Sheng, H. Liu and X. Zhu, Development of a multi-channel compact-size wireless hybrid sEMG/NIRS sensor system for prosthetic manipulation. IEEE Sens. J., 16(2) (2016) 447–456. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2015.2459067.
I.H. de Oliveira and A. Balbinot, Portable electrocardiograph based on the integrated circuit ADS1294 using an android application as interface. Health Technol. (Berl), 5(2) (2015) 147–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-015-0113-3.
M. Lv, G.F. Ou and Y. Ma, Design and implementation of a wireless iidentification device. J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 2005(1) (2021) 832–840. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2005/1/012114.
H. Huang, P. Zhou, G. Li and T.A. Kuiken, An analysis of EMG electrode configuration for targeted muscle reinnervation based neural machine interface. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., 16(1) (2008) 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2007.910282.
Y.H. Hsueh, C. Yin and Y.H. Chen, Hardware system for real-time emg signal acquisition and separation processing during electrical stimulation. J. Med. Syst., 39(9) (2015) 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-015-0267-6.
R. Kinugasa and S. Kubo, Development of consumer-friendly surface electromyography system for muscle fatigue detection. IEEE Access, 11(January) (2023) 6394–6403. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3237557.
J. Park, J. Berman, A. Dodson, Y. Liu, M. Armstrong, H. Huang, D. Kaber, J. Ruiz and M. Zahabi, Assessing workload in using electromyography (EMG)-based prostheses. Ergonomics (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2023.2221413.
V. Gohel and N. Mehendale, Review on electromyography signal acquisition and processing. Biophys. Rev., 12(6) (2020) 1361–1367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12551-020-00770-w.
P. Merriaux, Y. Dupuis, R. Boutteau, P. Vasseur and X. Savatier, A study of vicon system positioning performance. Sensors (Switzerland), 17(7) (2017) 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17071591.
P. Puchaud, C. Sauret, A. Muller, N. Bideau, G. Dumont, H. Pillet and C. Pontonnier, Accuracy and kinematics consistency of marker-based scaling approaches on a lower limb model: a comparative study with imagery data. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Engin., 23(3) (2020) 114–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2019.1705798.
S. Crea, M. Donati, S. Marco, M. De Rossi and C.M. Oddo, A wireless flexible sensorized insole for gait analysis. Sensors, 14 (2014) 1073–1093. https://doi.org/10.3390/s140101073.
L.P. Maletsky, J. Sun and N.A. Morton, Accuracy of an optical active-marker system to track the relative motion of rigid bodies. J. Biomech., 40(3) (2007) 682–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.01.017.
“MotionLabSystem.pdf.” http://www.motion-labs.com/ (accessed Oct. 12, 2022).
“BTS.pdf.” https://www.btsbioengineering.com/ (accessed Oct. 12, 2022).
C.J. De Luca, Surface electromyography: detection and recording. Science (2002). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.196.4292.879.
H. M. Desa, M. S. Zuber, R. Jailani, and N. M. Tahir, “Development of EMG Circuit for Detection of Leg Movement,” pp. 46–51, 2016.
A. Kaur, A. Kumar and R. Agarwal, Wavelet based machine learning technique to classify the different shoulder movement of upper limb amputee. J. Biomimetics Biomater. Biomed. Eng., 31 (2017) 32–43. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/JBBBE.31.32.
R. Gupta and R. Agarwal, Electromyographic signal-driven continuous locomotion mode identification module design for lower limb prosthesis control. Arab. J. Sci. Eng., 43(12) (2018) 7817–7835. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-018-3193-3.
I.S. Dhindsa, R. Agarwal and H.S. Ryait, Principal component analysis-based muscle identification for myoelectric-controlled exoskeleton knee. J. Appl. Stat., 44(10) (2016) 1707–1720. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2016.1221907.
R. Gupta and R. Agarwal, Single muscle surface EMGs locomotion identification module for prosthesis control. Neurophysiology, 51(3) (2019) 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11062-019-09812-w.
N. Saini, S. Bhardwaj and R. Agarwal, An intelligent approach of measurement and uncertainty estimation for hidden information detection using brain signals. Mapan-J. Metrol. Soc. India, 37(1) (2022) 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12647-021-00493-7.
A. Sohane and R. Agarwal, A single platform for classification and prediction using a hybrid bioinspired and deep neural network (PSO-LSTM). Mapan-J. Metrol. Soc. India, 37(1) (2022) 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12647-021-00478-6.
SENIAM, “Sensors location: Recommendations for sensor locations on individual muscles,” 2016. http://seniam.org/sensor_location.htm (accessed Feb. 20, 2020).
J.A. Brantley, T.P. Luu, S. Nakagome, F. Zhu and J.L. Contreras Vidal, Full body mobile brain-body imaging data during unconstrained locomotion on stairs, ramps, and level ground”. Sci. Data, 5 (2018) 180133. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.133.
R. Gupta and R. Agarwal, Single channel EMG-based continuous terrain identification with simple classifier for lower limb prosthesis. Biocybern. Biomed. Eng., 39(3) (2019) 775–788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbe.2019.07.002.
R. Gupta, I.S. Dhindsa and R. Agarwal, Continuous angular position estimation of human ankle during unconstrained locomotion. Biomed. Signal Process. Control, 60 (2020) 101968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2020.101968.
S. Rab, S. Yadav, A. Zafer, A. Haleem, P.K. Dubey, J. Singh, R. Kumar, R. Sharma and L. Kumar, Least square fitting and calibration factor methods for the evaluation of measurement uncertainty using direct pressure indicating devices. Mapan-J. Metrol. Soc. India, 34(3) (2019) 305–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12647-019-00333-9.
S.K. Jaiswal, S. Yadav and R. Agarwal, Multiple weighing based method for realizing flow. Mapan-J. Metrol. Soc. India, 30(2) (2015) 119–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12647-014-0122-0.
J. Yen, D. Leber, and L. Pibida, Comparing Instruments, pp. 1–57, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/TechnicalNotes/NIST.TN.2106.pdf
M.B.I. Raez, M.S. Hussain, F. Mohd-Yasin, M.B.I. Reaz, M.S. Hussain and F. Mohd-Yasin, Techniques of EMG signal analysis: detection, processing, classification and applications. Biol. Proced. Online, 8(1) (2006) 11–35. https://doi.org/10.1251/bpo115.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Gupta, R., Dhindsa, I.S. & Agarwal, R. Development and Uncertainty Assessment of Low-Cost Portable EMG Acquisition Module. MAPAN 39, 195–209 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12647-023-00706-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12647-023-00706-1