Log in

Prediction of Element Transfer Behaviour in SAW Process Using SiO2-CaO-TiO2 & Al2O3-SiO2-CaO Silica Based Flux Systems

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Silicon Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Weld mechanical as well as metallurgical properties are widely affected by the flux composition. Selection of flux composition play an important role in determining the good bead quality and mechanical properties of the welded joint. By using laboratory developed agglomerated rutile basic fluxes a study has been carried out to predict the element transfer behaviour in submerged arc welding process (SAW). With the application of mathematical experiments of mixture design approach different statistical model were developed in terms of flux constituents. Using twenty one rutile basic submerged arc welding fluxes a series of bead on plate weld deposits were made at constant welding parameters. Twenty one submerged arc welding fluxes were prepared as per mixture design approach for SiO2-CaO-TiO2 & Al2O3-SiO2-CaO flux system. Regression models were developed in terms of individual, binary and ternary mixture flux constituents for different ∆ quantities. Mathematical regression models have been checked for 95% significance level by using F-test. Results indicates that there was predominant effect on weld metal carbon, silicon, manganese, sulphur, phosphorous, molybdenum and chromium contents. Individual flux ingredients CaO and SiO2, has synergistic effect on ∆C and increases its weld bead carbon content while TiO2 and Al2O3 shows antisynergistic effect on ∆C and decreases the delta carbon content in weld region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

I Lochan Sharma (Corresponding Author) certified that data & material will be available on author’s request.

References

  1. Grey JM (2002) An independent view of linepipe and linepipe steel for high strength pipelines. Microalloying international, LP, Houston, Texas, X80 pipeline cost workshop

  2. Liu C, Bhole SD (2013) Challenges and developments in pipeline weldability and mechanical properties. Sci Technol Weld Join 18(2):169–181

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Das AK (2010) The present and the future of line pipe steels for petroleum industry. Mater Manuf Process 25:14–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hillenbrand HG, Kalwa C (2002) High strength line pipe for project cost reduction. World Pipelines 2:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chai CS, Eagar TW (1981) Slag-metal equilibrium during submerged arc welding. Metall Trans B 12:53–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mitra U, Eagar TW (1991) Slag-metal reactions during welding: part I. Evaluation and reassessment of existing theories. Metall Trans B 22:65–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dallam CB, Liu S, Olson DL (1985) Flux composition dependence of microstructure and toughness of submerged arc HSLA weldments. Weld J 64:52

    Google Scholar 

  8. Paniagua-Mercado AM, Lopez-Hirata VM, Saucedo Munoz ML (2005) Influence of the chemical composition of flux on the microstructure and tensile properties of submerged-arc welds. J Mater Proc Technol 169:34–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shu Q, Wang Y, Li J, Chou CK (2015) Effect of Na2O on dissolution rate of alumina in CaO-Al2O3-MgO-SiO2 slag. ISIJ Int 55(11):2297–2303

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sharma L, Chhibber R (2019) Investigating the physicochemical and thermophysical properties of submerged arc welding fluxes designed using TiO2-SiO2-MgO and SiO2-MgO-Al2O3 flux systems for linepipe steels. Ceram Int 45:1569–1587

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tuliani SS, Boniszewski T, Eaton NF (1969) Notch toughness of commercial submerged arc weld metal. Weld Met Fabr 37:32–39

    Google Scholar 

  12. Eagar TW (1978) Sources of weld metal oxygen contamination during submerged arc welding. Weld J 57:76

    Google Scholar 

  13. Coetsee T, Mostert RJ, Pistorius PGH (2021) The effect of flux chemistry on element transfer in submerged arc welding: application of thermochemical modelling. J Mater Res Technol 11:2021–2036

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. **dal S, Chhibber R, Mehta NP (2015) Prediction of element transfer due to flux and optimization of chemical composition and mechanical properties in high-strength low-alloy steel weld. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 229:785–801

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kanjilal P, Pal TK, Majumdar SK (2006) Combined effect of flux and welding parameters on chemical composition and mechanical properties of submerged arc weld metal. J Mater Process Technol 171:223–231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kanjilal P, Pal TK, Majumdar SK (2007) Prediction of element transfer in submerged arc welding. Magnesium 10:40

    Google Scholar 

  17. Burck PA, Indacochea JE, Olson DL (1990) Effects of welding flux additions on 4340 steel weld metal composition. Weld J 3:115–122

    Google Scholar 

  18. Beidokhti B, Koukabi AH, Dolati A (2009) Influences of titanium and manganese on high strength low alloy SAW weld metal properties. Mat Charact 6:225–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Trindade BV, Payao CD, Souza J, Paranhos GFL (2007) The role of addition of Ni on the microstructure and the mechanical behaviour of C-Mn weld metals. Exacta 5:177–183

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yoshino Y, Stot RD (1979) Effect of microalloys on the notch toughness of line pipe seam welds. Weld Res Suppl 1:2–5

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cornell JA (2011) Experiments with mixtures: designs, models, and the analysis of mixture data. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Eriksson G, Pelton AD (1993) Critical evaluation and optimization of thermodynamic properties and phase diagrams of the CaO-Al2O3, Al2O3-SiO2 and CaO- SiO2-Al2O3 systems. Metall Mater Trans B 24:807–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Anderson VL, McLean RA (1974) Design of experiments: a realistic approach. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kanjilal P, Majumdar SK, Pal TK (2005) Prediction of acicular ferrite from flux ingredients in submerged arc weld metal of C-Mn steel. ISIJ Int 45:876–885

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pandey ND, Bharti A, Gupta SR (1994) Effect of submerged arc welding parameters and fluxes on element transfer behaviour and weld-metal chemistry. J Mater Process Tech 40:195–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kanjilal P, Pal TK, Majumdar SK (2007) Prediction of element transfer in submerged arc welding. Weld J 86:135s–146s

    Google Scholar 

  27. Chang KL, Huang CT, Huang W et al (2008) Investigations of microstructure and phosphorus distribution in BOF slag. China Steel Tech Rep 21:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bhandari D, Chhibber R, Arora N (2012) Effect of electrode coatings on diffusible hydrogen content, hardness and microstructures of the ferritic heat affected zones in bimetallic welds. Adv Mater Res 383:4697–4701

    Google Scholar 

  29. Singh K, Pandey S (2008) Economics of recycling submerged arc welding slag as a flux. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on trends in welding research, Pine Mountain, GA, Materials Park, OH: ASM International, 2, pp 806–810

  30. **dal S, Chhibber R, Mehta NP (2014) Effect of welding parameters on bead profile, microhardness and H2 content in submerged arc welding of high-strength low-alloy steel. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 228:82–94

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Paniagua-Mercado AM, Lopez-Hirata VM (2011) Chemical and physical properties of fluxes for SAW of low-carbon steels. Arc Welding 13:281–298

    Google Scholar 

  32. Plessis Du J, du Toit M, Pistorius PC (2007) Control of diffusible weld metal hydrogen through flux chemistry modification. Weld J 86:273s–280s

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ramirez JE (2008) Characterization of high-strength steel weld metals: chemical composition, microstructure, and non-metallic inclusions. Weld J 87:65s–75s

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hummel FA (1984) Introduction to phase equilibrium in ceramics systems. CRC Press Ltd, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  35. Waris KN, Rahul C (2021) Experimental investigation on dissimilar weld between super duplex stainless steel 2507 and API X70 pipeline steel. Proc Inst Mech Eng L J Mater Des Appl 235(8):1827–1840. https://doi.org/10.1177/14644207211013056

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Waris KN, Rahul C (2021) Characterization of CaO-CaF2-TiO2-SiO2 based welding slags for physicochemical and thermophysical properties. Silicon 13(7):1575–1589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-020-00537-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Derringer G, Suich R (1980) Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. J Qual Technol 12:214–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Harrington EC (1965) The desirability function. Ind Qual Control 21:494–498

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

It is requested to editorial board to please acknowledge the present research for possible publication in Silicon journal. The content is new and unpublished.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

It is certified on behalf of corresponding author (Lochan Sharma) that all authors are equally contributed in the present manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lochan Sharma.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

I Lochan Sharma (Corresponding Author) on behalf of other co-authors certified that I have taken the ethical approval to publish the data presented in the manuscript. Also the data used in this manuscript (such as figures) has been cited in this paper.

Consent to Participate

NA.

Consent of Publication

I Lochan Sharma (Corresponding Author) on behalf of other coauthors certified that I have taken the permission to publish the present content.

Competing Interests

It is certified on behalf of corresponding author (Lochan Sharma) that present research is not funded by any external agency and authors declared that there is no conflicts of interest in the present research.

Conflicts of Interests

It is certified on behalf of corresponding author (Lochan Sharma) that present research is not funded by any external agency and authors declared that there is no conflicts of interest in the present research.

Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals

The present research is involved for human participants.

Informed Consent

NA.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharma, L., Chhibber, R., Kumar, A. et al. Prediction of Element Transfer Behaviour in SAW Process Using SiO2-CaO-TiO2 & Al2O3-SiO2-CaO Silica Based Flux Systems. Silicon 14, 11503–11517 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-022-01884-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-022-01884-4

Keywords

Navigation