Log in

Comparative study between density porosity and density magnetic resonance porosity: a case study of Sequoia gas reservoir, Mediterranean offshore gas, Egypt

  • S. I. SCJGE-1 2019
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work deals with a comparative study between density porosity and density magnetic resonance porosity in late Pliocene El Wastani gas reservoir, Sequoia field, West Delta Deep Marine (WDDM). In this study, the available well logging data by collecting, gathering, uploading, analyzing, and interpreting are used. Porosity determination, from the petrophysical parameters, routinely considered the most important process. The determined porosity by the two techniques is compared. Density resulting in density porosity (PHIT-D) showed results more than 23% in gas-bearing reservoir zones and less than 22% in non-gas reservoir zones. The porosity determined from integrating nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) with conventional density porosity resulting in density magnetic resonance porosity (DMRP) showed results less than 33% in gas-bearing reservoir zones and more than 37% non-bearing gas zones. Comparison between the results of the two techniques in gas-bearing zones, PHIT-D is increasing and DMRP is not affected. DMRP considered the best and most true porosity against gas reservoir. This comparison is valid in any gas-bearing formations by using the proposed technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aal A. A., El Barkooky, M., Gerrits, H. J., Meyer, M., Schwander, and Zaki, H. (2006): “Tectonic evolution of the eastern Mediterranean Basin and its significance for the hydrocarbon prospectivity of the Nile Delta deepwater area”. GeoArabia, 6(3):363–384

  • Abushanab M, Hamada G, Oraby M, Abdelwaly A (2005) DMR technique improves tight gas sand porosity. Oil Gas J 103(47):54–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Chuah T (1996) Estimation of relaxation time distribution for NMR CPMG measurements. M.Sc Thesis. Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA, 131 p

  • Coates G, Marschall D, Mardon M, Galford J (1997) A new characterization of bulk-volume irreducible using magnetic resonance. Paper QQ, 38th Annual SPWLA Logging Symposium Transactions, 14 p. Also published in 1997 in DiaLog (London Petrophysical society), 5(6): 9–16. Later revised and published in The Log Analyst 39(1):51–63

  • Coates G, **ao L, Prammer M (1999) NMR logging principles and applications. Halliburton Energy Services, Houston, Texas, US 234 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross NE, Cunningham A, Cook RJ, Taha A, Esmaiel E, El Swidan N (2009) Three-dimensional seismic geomorphology of a deep-water slope-channel system. The Sequoia field, offshore west Nile Delta, Egypt. AAPG Bull 93(8):1063–1086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deibis S, Futyan ARI, Ince DM, Morley RJ, Seymour WP, Thompson S (1986) The stratigraphic framework of the Nile Delta and its implications with respect to the regions hydrocarbon potential. Egyptian General Petroleum Corporation Exploration & Production Conference Proceedings, Cairo, pp 164–175

  • Dunn K, Bergman D, Latorraca G (2002) Nuclear magnetic resonance: petrophysical and logging applications, handbook of geophysical exploration. Pergamon, New York, pp 1–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman R, Morris C (1995) Processing data from an NMR logging tool. SPE 30560, Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition Proceedings, Formation Evaluation and Reservoir Geology, Dallas, pp 301–316

  • Galarza J, Chase KO, Sapp E, Vaughn K, Valee R, DiFiglia M, Aronin N (1997) Fast transport and retrograde movement of huntingtin and HAP 1 in axons. Neuro Rep 8:2247–2251

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunewald E, Knight R (2009) A laboratory study of NMR relaxation times and pore coupling in heterogeneous media. Geophysics 74(6):E215–E221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guichet X, Fluery M, Kohler E (2008) Effect of clay aggregation on water diffusivity using low-field NMR. J Colloid Interface Sci 327:84–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanafy S, Farhood K, Mahmoud S, Nimmagadda S, Mabrouk W (2018) Geological and geophysical analyses of the different reasons for DHI failure case in the Nile Delta Pliocene section. Data considered and methodologies. J Pet Explor Prod Technol, 970 P. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-018-0445-4

  • Hodgkins M, Howard J (1999) Applications of NMR logging to reservoir characterization of low-resistivity sands in the Gulf of Mexico. AAPG Bull 83(1):114–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating K, Knight R (2010) A laboratory study of the effect of Fe (II)-bearing minerals on nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) relaxation measurements. Geophysics 75(3):F71–F82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinberg R, Farooqui S (1993) T1/T2 ratio and frequency dependence of NMR relaxation in porous sedimentary rocks. J Colloid Interface Sci 188:195–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinberg R, Horsfield M (1990) Transverse relaxation processes in porous sedimentary rocks. J Magn Reson 88:9–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinberg R, Vinegar H (1996) NMR properties of pore fluids. Log Anal 37(6):20–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez G (2000) Nuclear magnetic measurements in shales. M.Sc. Thesis. Texas Tech University, U.S.A, 82 p

  • Mohamed IA, Shenkar O, Mahmoud H (2017) Understanding reservoir heterogeneity through water saturation prediction via neural network - a case study from offshore Nile Delta. Lead Edge 36/4:298–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nestor F, Costas N (2019) New technologies for Eastern Mediterranean offshore gas exploration. Offshore gas development in the Easter Mediterranean, pp 7–8. https://doi.org/10.2861/617596

  • Prammer M (2004) NMR in well logging and hydrocarbon exploration. Appl Magn Reson 25:637–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prammer M, Drack E, Bouton J, Gardner J, Coates G, Chandler R, Miller M (1996) Measurements of clay-bound water and total porosity by magnetic resonance logging. SPE 36522, Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition Proceedings, (formation evaluation and reservoir geology), pp 111–118. Also published in 1996 in The Log Analyst 37(5):61–69

  • Rizzini A, Vezzani F, Milad G (1978) Stratigraphy and sedimentation of a Neogene Quaternary section in the Nile Delta area. Mar Geol 27:327–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuel A, Kneller B, Raslan S, Sharp A, Parsons C (2003) Prolific deep-marine slope channels of the Nile Delta, Egypt. AAPG Bull 87(4):541–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serra O (1985) Diagraphies différées, Bases de l′interprétation, Tome2, Interprétation des données diagraphiques. Bulletin des Centres de Recherches Exploration–Production Elf-Aquitaine, Elf-Aquitaine-Edition, Pau, 625 p

  • Smithson T (2012) How porosity is measured. Schlumberger. Oilfield Rev 24(3):63–64 https://www.slb.com/~/media/Files/resources/oilfield_review/ors12/aut12/define_porosity.pdf. last accessed 15 June 2019

    Google Scholar 

  • Straley C (1997) An experimental investigation of methane in rock materials. In: SPWLA 38th Annual Logging Symposium, Houston, 15–18 June, 1997

  • Tiab D, Donaldson EC (2004) Petrophysics, theory and practice of measuring reservoir rock and fluid transport properties. Elsevier, Oxford 889 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Timur A (1969) Producible porosity and permeability of sandstones investigated through nuclear magnetic resonance principles. Log Anal 10:3–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Toumelin E, Torres-Verdin C, Chen S (2003) Modeling of multiple echo-time NMR measurements for complex pore geometries and multiphase saturations. SPE Reserv Eval Eng 6(4):234–243

  • **ao L, Zhi-qiang M, Gao-ren L, ** Y (2012) Calculation of porosity from nuclear magnetic resonance and conventional logs in gas-bearing reservoir. Acta Geophys 60(4):1030–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • **e R, **ao L (2009) NMR logging probing the internal magnetic field gradients of rocks. Chin J Geophys 52(3):650–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao Y, Liu D, Che Y, Tang D, Tang S, Huang W (2010) Petrophysical characterization of coals by low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). Fuel 89(7):1371–1380

  • Zalewska J, Cebulski D (2011) Analysis of rock pore space saturation distribution with nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) method part II. NAFTA-GAZ, ROK LXVII, pp 619–626

Download references

Acknowledgements

A grateful thanks to EGPC by the authors for agreeing the required data and publishing. And also for many colleagues helped on oral aid and for general advice. All improved the quality of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed Abdelwahab Ataallah.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Current Advances in Geological Research of Egypt

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

El Shayeb, H.M., Abdel-Gawad, G.I., Noah, A.Z. et al. Comparative study between density porosity and density magnetic resonance porosity: a case study of Sequoia gas reservoir, Mediterranean offshore gas, Egypt. Arab J Geosci 13, 316 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-5221-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-5221-3

Keywords

Navigation