Log in

Wing crack propagation model under high hydraulic pressure in compressive-shear stress state

  • Published:
Journal of Coal Science and Engineering (China)

Abstract

A new wing crack model subjected to hydraulic pressure and far-field stresses was proposed considering the effect of hydraulic pressure in wing crack and the connected part of the main crack on the stress intensity factor at the wing crack tip. With the equivalent crack length l eq of the wing crack introduced, the stress intensity factor K I at the wing crack tip was assumed to the sum of two terms: on one hand a component K (1)I for a single isolated straight wing crack of length 2l, and subjected to hydraulic pressure in the wing crack and far-field stresses; on the other hand a component K (2)I due to the effective shear stress induced by the presence of the equivalent main crack. The lateral tensile stress and hydraulic high pressure are the key factors that induce crack propagation unsteadily. The new wing crack theoretical model proposed can supply references for the study on hydraulic fracture in fractured masses, hydraulic fracturing in rock masses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashby M F, Hallam S D, 1986. The failure of brittle solids containing small cracks under compressive stress states. Acta Metall., 34: 497–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashby M F, Sammis, 1990. The damage mechanics of brittle solids in compression. Pageoph., 133(3): 489–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baud P, Reuschle T, Charlez P, 1996. An improved wing crack model for the deformation and failure of rock in compression. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstracts, 33(5): 539–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai M, 2008. Influence of intermediate principal stress on rock fracturing and strength near excavation boundaries: insight from numerical modeling. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 45: 763–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai M, Kaiser P K, 2005. Assessment of excavation damaged zone using micromechanics model. Tunnell Undergr Space Tech nology, 20(4): 301–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horii H, Nemat-Nasser S, 1985. Compression-induced micro-crack growth in brittle solids: axial splitting and shear failure. J. Geophys.Res., 90: 3 105–3 125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horri H, Nemat-Nasswer S, 1986. Brittle failure in compression: splitting, faulting and brittle-ductile transition. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond, 139(A): 337–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katsumi N, Hirokazu M, Hiroaki N, Noriyoshi T, 2008. Mechanical and hydraulic coupling of injection-induced slip along pre-existing fractures. Geothermics, 37: 157–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee M Y, Haimson B C, 1989. Statistical evaluation of hydraulic fracturing stress measurement parameters. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr., 26: 447–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo X R, Guy V, 2002. Natural hydraulic cracking: numerical model and sensitivity study. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 201: 431–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papanastasiou P C, 1997. A coupled elastoplastic hydraulic fracturing model. Int. J. Rock Mech. & Min. Sci., 34: 3–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahouryeh E, Dyskin A V, Germanovich L N, 2002. Crack growth under biaxial compression. Eng. Fract. Mech., 69(18): 2 187–2 198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steif P S, 1984. Crack extension under compressive loading. Engng. Fract. Mech., 20: 463–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang L S, Zhang P C, Wang S J, 2002. Testing study on effects of chemical action of Aqueous solution on crack propagation in rock. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 21(6): 822–827.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y H, Xu Y, Tang G H, 2000. An improved calculative model for wing crack. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 22(5): 612–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshito N, 1993. Buoyancy-driven propagation of an isolated fluid-filled crack in rock: implication for fluid transport in metamorphism. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 114: 289–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y L, Cao P, Wang Y X, Liu Y K, 2008a. Coupling model of seepage-damage-fracture in fractured rock masses and its application. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 27(8): 1 634–1 643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y L, Cao P, Wen Y D, 2008b. Damage fracturefailure mechanism of compressive-shear rock cracks underseepage pressure. Journal of Central South University: Science and Technology, 39(4): 838–844.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhuang N, 2006. Propagation rule of crack rock mass and its mathematics model research under the hydraulic-stress coupling. Doctors’thesis: Tongji University.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wen-jun Wang.

Additional information

Supported by the National Basic Research Program of China(2007CB209400); Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China(10JJ3007)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhao, Yl., Wang, Wj. Wing crack propagation model under high hydraulic pressure in compressive-shear stress state. J Coal Sci Eng China 17, 34–38 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12404-011-0107-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12404-011-0107-3

Keywords

Navigation