Abstract
Purpose
Hematogones have similar antigenic and light scatter properties when compared to CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) but they form a separate cluster with dimmer CD45 expression. These should be excluded while enumerating HSC, as their inclusion can overestimate and hence affect the final dose of HSC. However, their exact impact on the outcome of HSC transplant (HSCT) is not entirely known and hence this study was undertaken to address these issues, if any.
Methods
This was a retrospective study in which patients undergoing HSCT were included, and flow cytometric enumeration was done on the apheresis product using single platform ISHAGE protocol. The gating of all plots was reviewed and carefully studied for hematogone population which would have otherwise been included in the original gating.
Results
Totally 78 patients underwent HSCT during the study period. On re-analysis, it was found that 10/78 (12.8%) cases had a separate hematogone population which was included in the HSC in the original analysis. Out of these 10 cases, 7/51 and 3/27 were in autologous and allogenic subgroup respectively. However, all the ten cases ultimately had adequate final stem cell dose and had successful engraftment.
Conclusion
The inclusion of hematogones in CD34+ HSC enumeration of apheresis products did not yield any impact on neither the final dose nor the outcome of transplant in this study. However, it is recommended to exclude them from the final count when they are > 10% of the final HSC lest it overestimate the final harvest dose and outcome of HSCT.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12288-022-01607-0/MediaObjects/12288_2022_1607_Fig1_HTML.png)
References
Gutensohn K, Magens MM, Kuehnl P, Zeller W (2010) Increasing the economic efficacy of peripheral blood progenitor cell collections by monitoring peripheral blood CD34 + concentrations. Transfusion 50:656–662
Barnett D, Janossy G, Lubenko A, Matutes E, Newland A, Reilly JT (1999) Guideline for the flow cytometric enumeration of CD34 + haematopoietic stem cells. Clin Lab Haematol 21:301–308
Sutherland DR, Anderson L, Keeney M, Nayar R, Chin-Yee I (1996) The ISHAGE guidelines for CD34 + cell determination by flow cytometry. Int Soc Hematotherapy Graft Eng J Hematother 5:213–226
McKenna RW, Washington LT, Aquino DB, Picker LJ, Kroft SH (2001) Immunophenotypic analysis of hematogones (B-lymphocyte precursors) in 662 consecutive bone marrow specimens by 4-color flow cytometry. Blood 98:2498–2507
Thiago LS, Sutherland DR (2015) CD34 + B-cell progenitors in mobilized peripheral blood apheresis collections: implications for flow cytometric assessment of graft adequacy. Cytotherapy 17:689–691
Ondrejka SL, Hsi ED, Rybicki LA, Katanik DA, Bolwell BJ, Dương HK (2012) Hematogones contained in CD34 + apheresis products for hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation have no adverse impact on Engraftment Outcomes. Blood 120:3022
Matos DM (2022) B-cell precursors (hematogones) in CD34 + hematopoietic stem cell collections: a single-center experience [letter]. 20:eCE0018 einstein (São Paulo)
Acknowledgements
All authors acknowledge the technical support by Mrs. K. Sushya, Technical Officer and Mrs. Manimegalai, Technical Assistant in the flow cytometry laboratory throughout the project.
Funding
Source(s) of support/ funding: Intramural grant received from the Institute (Rs.1,98,500/-).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Naadia Fatima Nadeem, Prabhu Manivannan, Abhishekh Gowda and Smita Kayal. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Naadia Fatima Nadeem and all authors commented and corrected the previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicting Interest
Nil.
Ethics Approval
Ethical approval was obtained from the local Ethics Committee of the institute and all the procedures performed met the ethical guidelines and waiver of consent obtained from the Ethics committee.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nadeem, N.F., Manivannan, P., Kayal, S. et al. Does the Inclusion of CD34+ B-cell Progenitors (Hematogones) in Stem Cell Enumeration of Apheresis Product Using ISHAGE Protocol Affect the Final Harvest dose Adequacy and the Outcome of Transplantation? A Single Institution Experience from Southern India. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus 39, 491–494 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12288-022-01607-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12288-022-01607-0