Log in

Does the Inclusion of CD34+ B-cell Progenitors (Hematogones) in Stem Cell Enumeration of Apheresis Product Using ISHAGE Protocol Affect the Final Harvest dose Adequacy and the Outcome of Transplantation? A Single Institution Experience from Southern India

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Hematogones have similar antigenic and light scatter properties when compared to CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) but they form a separate cluster with dimmer CD45 expression. These should be excluded while enumerating HSC, as their inclusion can overestimate and hence affect the final dose of HSC. However, their exact impact on the outcome of HSC transplant (HSCT) is not entirely known and hence this study was undertaken to address these issues, if any.

Methods

This was a retrospective study in which patients undergoing HSCT were included, and flow cytometric enumeration was done on the apheresis product using single platform ISHAGE protocol. The gating of all plots was reviewed and carefully studied for hematogone population which would have otherwise been included in the original gating.

Results

Totally 78 patients underwent HSCT during the study period. On re-analysis, it was found that 10/78 (12.8%) cases had a separate hematogone population which was included in the HSC in the original analysis. Out of these 10 cases, 7/51 and 3/27 were in autologous and allogenic subgroup respectively. However, all the ten cases ultimately had adequate final stem cell dose and had successful engraftment.

Conclusion

The inclusion of hematogones in CD34+ HSC enumeration of apheresis products did not yield any impact on neither the final dose nor the outcome of transplant in this study. However, it is recommended to exclude them from the final count when they are > 10% of the final HSC lest it overestimate the final harvest dose and outcome of HSCT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Gutensohn K, Magens MM, Kuehnl P, Zeller W (2010) Increasing the economic efficacy of peripheral blood progenitor cell collections by monitoring peripheral blood CD34 + concentrations. Transfusion 50:656–662

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barnett D, Janossy G, Lubenko A, Matutes E, Newland A, Reilly JT (1999) Guideline for the flow cytometric enumeration of CD34 + haematopoietic stem cells. Clin Lab Haematol 21:301–308

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sutherland DR, Anderson L, Keeney M, Nayar R, Chin-Yee I (1996) The ISHAGE guidelines for CD34 + cell determination by flow cytometry. Int Soc Hematotherapy Graft Eng J Hematother 5:213–226

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. McKenna RW, Washington LT, Aquino DB, Picker LJ, Kroft SH (2001) Immunophenotypic analysis of hematogones (B-lymphocyte precursors) in 662 consecutive bone marrow specimens by 4-color flow cytometry. Blood 98:2498–2507

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Thiago LS, Sutherland DR (2015) CD34 + B-cell progenitors in mobilized peripheral blood apheresis collections: implications for flow cytometric assessment of graft adequacy. Cytotherapy 17:689–691

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ondrejka SL, Hsi ED, Rybicki LA, Katanik DA, Bolwell BJ, Dương HK (2012) Hematogones contained in CD34 + apheresis products for hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation have no adverse impact on Engraftment Outcomes. Blood 120:3022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Matos DM (2022) B-cell precursors (hematogones) in CD34 + hematopoietic stem cell collections: a single-center experience [letter]. 20:eCE0018 einstein (São Paulo)

Download references

Acknowledgements

All authors acknowledge the technical support by Mrs. K. Sushya, Technical Officer and Mrs. Manimegalai, Technical Assistant in the flow cytometry laboratory throughout the project.

Funding

Source(s) of support/ funding: Intramural grant received from the Institute (Rs.1,98,500/-).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Naadia Fatima Nadeem, Prabhu Manivannan, Abhishekh Gowda and Smita Kayal. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Naadia Fatima Nadeem and all authors commented and corrected the previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prabhu Manivannan MD., DNB., DM., MNAMS.

Ethics declarations

Conflicting Interest

Nil.

Ethics Approval

Ethical approval was obtained from the local Ethics Committee of the institute and all the procedures performed met the ethical guidelines and waiver of consent obtained from the Ethics committee.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nadeem, N.F., Manivannan, P., Kayal, S. et al. Does the Inclusion of CD34+ B-cell Progenitors (Hematogones) in Stem Cell Enumeration of Apheresis Product Using ISHAGE Protocol Affect the Final Harvest dose Adequacy and the Outcome of Transplantation? A Single Institution Experience from Southern India. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus 39, 491–494 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12288-022-01607-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12288-022-01607-0

Keywords

Navigation