Log in

Management of Various Rectal Lesions by Using Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery

  • Surgical Techniques and Innovations
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery is already well-established in the field colorectal surgery, thanks to the good oncological outcomes and early post-operative recovery in cases of early rectal tumors. transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) is becoming popular in managing benign and early malignant rectal lesions. The purpose of this study is to discuss feasibility of TAMIS in managing benign and early malignant rectal tumors, rectal strictures, and as a combined technique in procedures concerning chronic ulcerative colitis, FAP, and adenoma. A total of 12 patients (3 chronic ulcerative colitis, 2 GISTs, 2 stage I rectal cancer, 2 rectal adenoma, 2 anastomotic rectal stenosis, and 1 FAP) underwent surgery by using the technique of TAMIS. Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis, for chronic UC and FAP, en bloc excision for rectal GIST and T1 adenocarcinoma, radial incision and cutting for rectal strictures, and submucosal dissection of adenoma by TAMIS alone or combined with ESD were performed. GelPOINT path (Applied Medical) was used for transanal access. There were no intra-operative and immediate post-operative complications. The mean operation time was 81.2 min, ranging from 20 to 164 min. One patient with GIST had positive margin on pathology, which was re-excised using TAMIS. The patient with preoperative diagnosis of clinical T1 tubular adenocarcinoma revealed T3 tumor with positive lymph node on final pathology and was further managed with adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy. Thus, TAMIS is a safe and feasible surgical technique for minimally invasive management of various rectal lesions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Keller DS, Tahilramani RN, Flores-Gonzalez JR, Mahmood A, Haas EM (2016) Transanal minimally invasive surgery: review of indications and outcomes from 75 consecutive patients. J Am Coll Surg 222(5):814–822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Clancy C, Burke JP, Albert MR, O’Connell PR, Winter DC (2015) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus standard transanal excision for the removal of rectal neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 58(2):254–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Atallah S, Albert M, Debeche-Adams T, Larach S (2013) Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS): applications beyond local excision. Tech Coloproctol 17(2):239–243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nepal P, Mori S, Kita Y, Tanabe K, Baba K, Uchikado Y, Kurahara H, Arigami T, Sakoda M, Maemura K, Natsugoe S (2018) Management of a case of high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumor in rectum by transanal minimal invasive surgery. World J Surg Oncol 16(1):165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. de Groof EJ, Buskens CJ, Bemelman WA (2016) Single-port surgery in inflammatory bowel disease: a review of current evidence. World J Surg 40(9):2276–2282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Heppell J, Weiland LH, Perrault J, Pemberton JH, Telander RL, Beart RW (1983) Fate of the rectal mucosa after rectal mucosectomy and ileoanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 26(12):768–771

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tuckson W, Lavery I, Fazio V, Oakley J, Church J, Milsom J (1991) Manometric and functional comparison of ileal pouch anal anastomosis with and without anal manipulation. Am J Surg 161(1):90–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lovegrove RE, Constantinides VA, Heriot AG, Athanasiou T, Darzi A, Remzi FH, Nicholls RJ, Fazio VW, Tekkis PP (2006) A comparison of hand-sewn versus stapled ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) following proctocolectomy: a meta-analysis of 4183 patients. Ann Surg 244(1):18–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nepal P, Mori S, Kita Y, Tanabe K, Baba K, Uchikado Y, Kurahara H, Arigami T, Sakoda M, Maemura K, Natsugoe S (2019) Radial incision and cutting method using a transanal approach for treatment of anastomotic strictures following rectal cancer surgery: a case report. World J Surg Oncol 17(1):48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nakadoi K, Tanaka S, Hayashi N, Ozawa SI, Terasaki M, Takata S, Kanao H, Oka S, Chayama K (2012) Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal tumor close to the dentate line. Gastrointest Endosc 76(2):444–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Albert MR, Atallah SB, Izfar S, Larach SW (2013) Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) for local excision of benign neoplasms and early-stage rectal cancer: efficacy and outcomes in the first 50 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 56(3):301–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Availability of Data and Material

The data are available upon request.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

PN and SM conceived of the study, designed it, and acquired data. YK, MW, TT, and TO participated in design of the study, coordination, and analysis of data. PN drafted the manuscript. SM and TO participated in manuscript preparation and critical revision. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shinichiro Mori.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

Approved by the Ethics Committee of Kagoshima University Hospital. IRB approval codes 190189, 190190, 190191, and 190192.

Consent to Participate

Yes.

Consent for Publication

Yes.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

The supporting video describes the use of TAMIS for en bloc excision of tumors in video_1. The video_2 describes the use of TAMIS for the radial incision and cutting of anastomotic benign rectal strictures. The video_3 describes the use of TAMIS in combination with ESD to perform the submucosal dissection of anorectal adenomas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nepal, P., Mori, S., Kita, Y. et al. Management of Various Rectal Lesions by Using Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery. Indian J Surg 84, 349–354 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-021-02907-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-021-02907-x

Keywords

Navigation