Log in

Performance evaluation of occupant protection seats for underbody explosion conditions

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tactical vehicles operating in conflict regions have a risk of threats both within and outside combat zones. Enhancing protection against external threats is important, necessitating compliance with standards of ballistic resistance. These standards classify and test the bullet-resistant capabilities of military vehicles, construction materials, and personal protective gear. Occupant protection seats have been fabricated with impact and vibration absorption systems of pantograph with spring structure to reduce the impact on occupants. The experimental results demonstrate that the designed occupant protection seats effectively absorb the impact caused by an underbody explosion. Data obtained from accelerometers installed throughout the test facility indicate a significant reduction in impact velocity as it is absorbed by the pantograph with spring structure. This reduction assumes an 80 % decrease in impact transferred to anthropomorphic test devices occupants. These results imply that the designed occupant protection seats safely protect occupants within tactical vehicles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. Liu, W. Wang, X. Yan, M. Shen and H. Chen, The cascade influence of grain trade shocks on countries in the context of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10 (449) (2023) 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. T. Samuel, The Israel-Hamas war, historical context and international law, Middle East Policy, 30 (2023) 3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. NIJ Standard 0108.01, Ballistic Resistant Protective Materials, National Institute of Justice, USA (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  4. EN 1063, Glass in Building - Security Glazing - Testing and Classification of Resistance against Bullet Attack, European Committee for Standardization (1999).

  5. EN 1522, Windows, Doors, Shutters and Blinds - Bullet Resistance - Requirements and Classification, European Committee for Standardization (1998).

  6. VPAM APR 2006, General Basis for Ballistic Material, Construction and Product Testing, Association of Test Laboratories for Bullet Resistant Materials and Constructions (VPAM) (2014).

  7. STANAG 4569, Protection Levels for Occupants of Armoured Vehicles, NATO Standardization Agency (2012).

  8. H. Mahfuz, Y. Zhu, A. Haque, A. Abutalib, U. Vaidya, S. Jeelani, B. Gama, J. Gillespie and B. Fink, Investigation of high-velocity impact on integral armor using finite element method, International J. of Impact Engineering, 24 (2) (2000) 203–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. C. Y. Park, Numerical study on determining design parameters of wheeled armored vehicles, J. of Mechanical Science and Technology, 31 (12) (2017) 5785–5799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. A. N. Pratomo, S. P. Santosa, L. Gunawan and I. S. Putra, Countermeasures design and analysis for occupant survivability of an armored vehicle subjected to blast load, J. of Mechanical Science and Technology, 34 (2020) 1893–1899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Sliwinski, Protection of vehicles against mines, J. of KONES Powertrain and Transport, 18 (1) (2011) 565–572.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. S. W. Rouhana, P. G. Bedewi, S. V. Kankanala, P. Prasad, J. J. Zwolinski, A. G. Meduvsky, J. D. Rupp, T. A. Jeffreys and L. W. Schneider, Biomechanics of 4-point seat belt systems in frontal impacts, SAE International (2003) 2003-22-0017.

  13. S. W. Rouhana, S. V. Kankanala, P. Prasad, J. D. Rupp, T. A. Jeffreys and L. W. Schneider, Biomechanics of 4-point seat belt systems in farside impacts, SAE International (2006) 2006-22-0012.

  14. T. Natalini, K. Carr, M. Vala and W. Boroughf, Variables influencing shoulder belt positioning of four point safety belts, J. of Passenger Car: Mechanical Systems J., 110 (2001) 293–298.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Kaveh and A. Davaran, Analysis of pantograph foldable structures, Computers & Structures, 59 (1) (1996) 131–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. D. C. H Yang and Y. Y. Lin, Pantograph mechanism as a non-traditional manipulator structure, Mechanism and Machine Theory, 20 (2) (1985) 115–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. A. Bartsch, E. Benzel, V. Miele, D. Morr and V. Prakash, Hybrid III anthropomorphic test device (ATD) response to head impacts and potential implications for athletic headgear testing, Accident Analysis & Prevention, 48 (2012) 285–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. E. A. Sribnick, J. A. Mansfield, C. Rhodes, V. Fullaway and J. H. Bolte IV, Biomechanical effects of a halo orthotic on a pediatric anthropomorphic test device in a simulated frontal motor vehicle collision, Traffic Injury Prevention, 23 (8) (2022) 500–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. S. Y. Yun, W. S. Lee and K.-W. Gwak, CMG-based anthropomorphic test device for human rider behavior reproduction for two-wheeled self-balancing personal mobility, Mechatronics, 69 (2020) 102365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. J. R. Humm and N. Yoganandan, Sagittal plane moment responses of the THOR-05F anthropomorphic test device, Traffic Injury Prevention, 22 (2021) S155–S158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. L. Foster, P. Peketi, T. Allen, T. Senior, O. Duncan and A. Alderson, Application of auxetic foam in sports helmets, Applied Sciences, 8 (3) (2018) 354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. T. Nakanishi, M. Hitosugi, H. Murayama, A. Takeda, Y. Motozawa, M. Ogino and K. Koyama, Biomechanical analysis of serious neck injuries resulting from judo, Healthcare, 9 (2) (2021) 214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. R. V. Tsyshevsky, A. Zverev, A. Mitrofanov, S. N. Rashkeev and M. M. Kuklja, Photochemistry of the a-Al2O3-PETN interface, Molecules, 21 (3) (2016) 289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Y. Zhang, T. Wang and Y. He, Initial response of pentaerythritol tetranitrate (PETN) under the coupling effect of preheating, shock and defect via the molecular dynamics simulations with the multiscale shock technique method, Molecules, 28 (7) (2023) 2911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. M. Dymek, M. Ptak, M. Ratajczak, F. A. O. Fernandes, A. Kwiatkowski and J. Wilhelm, Analysis of HIC and hydrostatic pressure in the human head during NOCSAE tests of american football helmets, Brain Sciences, 11 (3) (2021) 287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. G. Lamanna, A. Vanacore, M. Guida, F. Caputo, F. Marulo, B. Vitolo and S. Cicatiello, Development of a head injury criteria-compliant aircraft seat by design of experiments, Aerospace, 6 (9) (2019) 95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was conducted under research funds from Gwangju University in 2024. This results were supported by Regional Innovation Strategy (RIS) through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (MOE) (2021RIS-002).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sang In Eom.

Additional information

Sang In Eom received the B.S. in Aerospace Engineering and the M.S. in Mechanical and Intelligent Systems Engineering from Pusan National University, Korea in 1998 and 2000, respectively. His Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering and Systems is from Osaka University, Japan in 2009. Since 2019, he has been an Assistant Professor at Gwangju University, Republic of Korea. His research interests include mechanical engineering, mechanical designs, microactuators using fluid power and optical measurement.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eom, S.I. Performance evaluation of occupant protection seats for underbody explosion conditions. J Mech Sci Technol 38, 3351–3359 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-024-0609-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-024-0609-8

Keywords

Navigation