Abstract
The outbreak of COVID-19 has brought many challenges to youth development. During this specific period, adolescents have suffered from numerous behavioral problems, which will lead to more maladaptive consequences. It is necessary to explore several protective factors to prevent or reduce the occurrence of problem behaviors in adolescence. The current study combined school resources and self-control to evaluate the multiple protective effects on adolescents’ problematic behaviors in a two-wave longitudinal study. A sample of 789 Chinese adolescents (Mage = 14.00 years, SD = 2.05, 418 boys) were recruited via the random cluster sampling method to participate in the survey. The results confirmed the assumptions about the multiple protective effects of school resources and self-control on adolescents’ problem behaviors. Specifically, school resources could negatively predict IGD and victimization, and self-control mediated these associations. Moreover, one problematic behavior could also mediate the associations between self-control and another problematic behavior. This is the first study to focus on the multiple protective effects of positive factors on adolescents’ problem behaviors during the post-pandemic period, which has made several contributions to the literature and practice.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Since the first case of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) was detected, mankind has waged a protracted war against the virus. As of 18 May 2022, this war without gunpowder has lasted more than two years, plundering the lives of over six million people and the freedom of survivors (WHO, 2022). Although the outbreak of COVID-19 cannot halt individual growth, it indeed has multifactorial effects on human development, especially for young people. Previous studies have well documented that adolescents suffer from more mental disorders (e.g., depression and anxiety), more physical problems (e.g., neuroinflammation and neuroimmunoendocrine changes), as well as more behavioral problems (e.g., hyperactivity-inattention and emotional problems) during the lockdown period (De Miranda et al., 2020; De Figueiredo et al., 2021; Liu et al., 2011). A high level of school resources means that the school provides a caring and encouraging climate, clear rules and harmonious relationships, and adolescents actively participate in learning activities (Benson et al., 2011). According to the developmental assets theory, adolescents who obtain more school resources will develop more flourishing achievements and fewer harmful problems in the future (Scales et al., 2000). In the current issue, adolescents who experience more school resources may develop fewer problematic behaviors. Empirical studies have provided numerous indirect evidence on the association between school resources and problematic behaviors. For instance, a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies suggested that school climate was negatively associated with problem behaviors (Reaves et al., 2018). As for the teacher-student relationship, students who had less conflict and were more intimate with teachers reported less involvement in problematic behaviors (Pakarinen et al., 2018). Moreover, the higher level of school engagement could predict fewer problem behaviors among Chinese adolescents (Hu et al., 2019).
More specifically, school resources may be an effective predictor of IGD, school bullying, and victimization among adolescents. There are two theories that could contribute to the understanding of the complex linkage. First, Bandura (1978) claims in the social learning theory that individual behavioral outcomes are shaped by the environment. Adolescents may learn bullying behaviors through observation of aggressive behaviors at school. However, schools with diverse resources, such as an encouraging atmosphere, clear rules, and harmonious relations, will guide students to use non-violent approaches to cope with conflicts and spare no effects to prevent adolescents from exposure to aggressive behaviors. In this aspect, school resources are potential protectors for adolescents’ bullying behaviors, which has been repeatedly confirmed among Chinese adolescents in previous longitudinal studies. Teng and his colleagues (2020) revealed that students with more positive perceptions of school climate reported lower levels of bullying perpetration over time. As for victimization, Chen et al. (2021) suggested that adolescents who reported more engagement in school would be less exposed to violence in school and cyberspace. Moreover, Nie et al. (2021) demonstrated that perceptions of school climate mitigated the positive association between bullying and victimization.
Second, the general strain theory highlights that individuals may adopt maladaptive behaviors to alleviate negative emotions caused by environmental stress (Agnew, 1992). From this perspective, students in schools with tense atmospheres and discordant relationships will feel unhappy, unsupported, and anxious, and then they will develop maladaptive behaviors such as IGD to alleviate these negative feelings. On the contrary, if schools provide a comfortable environment and abundant resources, students may positively involve themselves in academic activities and achieve more. To a certain degree, schools providing more positive resources might play an important role in the prevention of IGD among students. Previous studies have indicated that adolescents who experience more school engagement, positive perceptions of school climate, and support from teachers and classmates are less likely to develop IGD (Yu et al., 2015; Ma et al., 2017; Zou et al., 2022). Furthermore, ** problem behaviors by avoiding or reducing these risks. Existing studies have ignored the fact that young people indeed have positive traits to protect themselves, and the environment also provides many positive factors promoting individual growth (Scales et al., 2000). Moreover, little attention has been paid to the cumulative effects of diverse positive factors. To address these knowledge gaps, the present study, based on the problem behavior theory (Jessor, 1987), aims to evaluate the protective roles of school resources and self-control ability in adolescents’ problematic behaviors in the post-pandemic era. Considering the theoretical and empirical evidence on the associations between school resources, self-control, and problematic behaviors, the present study hypothesizes that (Fig. 1):
-
Hypothesis 1: School resources will positively predict self-control ability concurrently and longitudinally.
-
Hypothesis 2: School resources will negatively predict problematic behaviors concurrently and longitudinally.
-
Hypothesis 3: Self-control ability will mediate the relationship between school resources and problematic behaviors.
-
Hypothesis 4: One problematic behavior will mediate the relationship between school resources and other problematic behaviors.
-
Hypothesis 5: Self-control ability and one problematic behavior will sequentially mediate the relationship between school resources and other problematic behaviors.
Method
Participants and procedure
Using the random cluster sampling method, participants were recruited from one public middle school and one public high school in Hubei province, Central China. A sample of 789 students (Mage = 14.00 years, SD = 2.05, 418 boys) participated in the first data collection (T1: September, 2021) and completed self-reported questionnaires. 51 dropped out of the follow-up data collection (T2: January, 2022) for various reasons, such as absence. The final sample consisted of 738 adolescents and 70.05% of them were middle school students. Among the current sample, 50.65% were the only children in their families, and 95.44% were from families at or above the average economic level in the local cities. Moreover, Chi-square test and t-test reported that there were insignificant differences in gender (χ 2 (1) = 0.748, p = 0.387), T1 school resources (t (787) = -0.853, p = 0.394), T1 school bullying (t (52) = 1.261, p = 0.213), T1 school victimization (t (52) = 1.687, p = 0.098), and T1 IGD (t (53) = 1.833, p = 0.072) between the final sample and the lost sample, which indicated that the current findings would not be biased due to attrition.
Data was collected in the post-pandemic era. The Research Ethics Committee of the College of Education and Sports Sciences at Yangtze University provided ethical approval for the present study. Before the first formal survey, written consent was obtained from the school leaders, parents, and adolescents through the explanation of detailed information about the study. Well-trained researchers with negative test results for COVID-19 performed the survey within 50 min during school hours. Honest responses were encouraged by informing the anonymity of the survey. Participants did not receive any kind of gift for their participation. The procedures of the two surveys were the same.
Measures
School resources
The School Assets Subscale (SAS) from the Chinese version of the Developmental Assets Profile was adopted to assess adolescents’ school resources (Scales, 2011). The SAS includes 10 items, and one example item is “I have a school that cares about kids and encourages them”. Response options range from “1 = not at all or rarely” to “4 = extremely or almost always” on a four-point Likert scale. A higher total score indicates more quantity and higher quality of school resources. In previous empirical studies, this subscale suggested good reliability and validity in Chinese adolescents (Chang et al., 2020). In this study, the Cronbach’s α of this scale were 0.869 at T1 and 0.909 at T2.
Self-control
The Chinese version of the Brief Self-Control Scale (BSCS) was employed to measure adolescents’ self-control ability (Tangney et al., 2004; Unger et al., 2016). It consists of 13 items and rates on a five-point Likert scale ranging from “1 = not like me at all” to “5 = very much like me”. One sample item is “Sometimes I can’t stop myself from doing something, even if I know it is wrong”. A higher total score suggests a higher level of self-control ability. This scale had high internal consistency in the Chinese adolescent sample (Gu, 2020). In this study, its Cronbach’s α were 0.752 at T1 and 0.788 at T2.
School bullying and victimization
The Chinese version of the School Bullying and Victimization Scale (SBVS) was adopted to evaluate adolescents’ school bullying and victimization in the past six months (Deng et al., 2018). This scale composes two subscales, each of which includes six items. It rates on a five-point Likert scale ranging from “1 = never” to “5 = several times a week”. One example is “Others call me bad nicknames, scold me, make fun of me and ridicule me”. A higher total score on a subscale reflects a higher level of school bullying or victimization. This measure showed good reliability and validity among Chinese adolescents (Deng et al., 2018). In this study, the Cronbach’s α of the Bullying Subscale were 0.705 at T1 and 0.628 at T2, and the Cronbach’s α of the Victimization Subscale were 0.763 at T1 and 0.624 at T2. The Cronbach’s α of the total SBVS were 0.791 at T1 and 0.676 at T2.
Internet gaming disorder
The Chinese version of the Internet Gaming Disorder Questionnaire was used to measure adolescents’ IGD (Zhang et al., 2017). This scale has 11 items and responses on a three-point Likert scale (“1 = never” to “3 = often”). One example is “Would you skip homework to have more time to play online games”. A higher total score represents a higher level of IGD. This scale demonstrated good reliability and validity in a Chinese adolescent sample (Zhang et al., 2017). In this study, the Cronbach’s α were 0.811 at T1 and 0.827 at T2.
Demographic covariates
Several demographic factors were assessed at T1 in this study, including adolescent age, gender (1 = boys, 2 = girls), grade, only-child family (1 = yes, 2 = no), and family economic level (1 = above the average level, 2 = at the average level, 3 = below the average level).
Analytic plan
SPSS 26.0 and the PROCESS macro were employed to analyze the data. First, the Harman’s single-factor test was performed to evaluate the common method bias. Second, descriptive analysis and Pearson correlational analysis were performed to describe the basic associations among the main variables. Third, hierarchical regression analyses were used to assess the concurrent and longitudinal predictive effects among the main variables. Fourth, the PROCESS macro (model 81) was adopted to test the longitudinal mediating effects in the relationship between school resources, self-control and problem behaviors. Bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated with 2,000 re-samplings to examine the multiple mediating effects.
Results
Common method bias
Given that the data in the current study was collected by self-reported questionnaires, Harmen’s single factor test was adopted to test the common method bias. At T1, there were eight factors with characteristic root values greater than one, and the first factor only explained 16.71% of the variance. At T2, there were nine factors with characteristic root values greater than one, and the first factor only explained 18.50% of the variance. Overall, the common method bias appeared no threat in the current results.
Descriptive and correlational analyses
Table 1 displays the descriptive and correlational results of the main variables. School resources were positively associated with self-control ability at both waves in medium effect sizes (rs > 0, ps < 0.01). Adolescents who experienced more school resources reported better self-control ability. School resources were negatively related to school bullying and victimization at T2 and IGD at both waves in small-to-medium effect sizes (rs < 0, ps < 0.05). Adolescents obtained more school resources showed less engagement in three problem behaviors. Self-control ability was also negatively correlated to three problem behaviors in small-to-medium effect sizes (rs < 0, ps < 0.01). Adolescents who developed a greater self-control ability tended to engage less in problem behaviors. These three problem behaviors were significantly and positively associated with each other (rs > 0, ps < 0.05). Moreover, adolescent gender and grade were significantly related to self-control ability and three problem behaviors, so they were included as control variables in the following analyses.
Test of the concurrent and longitudinal predictive effects
As shown in Tables 2 and 3, school resources could predict self-control (β > 0, ps < 0.001), school victimization (β < 0, ps < 0.05) and IGD (β < 0, ps < 0.05) concurrently and longitudinally, supporting the first and second hypothesis. Adolescents who obtained more school resources tended to develop a higher level of self-control ability and less involvement in school victimization and IGD. Self-control ability had predictive effects on school bullying (β < 0, ps < 0.01) and IGD (β < 0, ps < 0.001) at the same time and five months later. A good self-control ability could significantly prevent adolescents from develo** these two problematic behaviors. School bullying and victimization could concurrently predict each other in small-to-medium effect sizes (β > 0, ps < 0.001). Furthermore, school victimization at T1 predicted bullying at T2. IGD and school bullying concurrently predicted each other in small effect sizes (β > 0, ps < 0.01). IGD and school victimization at T1 could also predict each other (β > 0, ps < 0.05). Adolescents involved in one problem behavior might also develop other more problem behaviors.
Test of the longitudinal mediating effects
Three longitudinal mediating models were constructed in the PROCESS macro (model 81) to examine the multiple mediating effects in the current study (Fig. 2). Table 4 reports the summary of the multiple longitudinal mediating effects. Self-control ability at T1 significantly mediated the relationships between T1 school resources and T2 problematic behaviors, which supports the third hypothesis. School victimization at T2 could mediate the relationships between school resources at T1, IGD at T2 (β = -0.004, 95%CI: -0.008, -0.001) and school bullying at T2 (β = -0.008, 95%CI: -0.014, -0.003). T2 IGD could mediate the relationships between school resources at T1, school bullying at T2 (β = -0.007, 95%CI: -0.014, -0.002) and school victimization at T2 (β = -0.006, 95%CI: -0.013, -0.001). These findings jointly supported the fourth hypothesis. Moreover, T1 self-control and T2 school bullying had sequential mediating effects on the relationships between T1 school resources, T2 school victimization (β = -0.006, 95%CI: -0.009, -0.003) and T2 IGD (β = -0.004, 95%CI: -0.007, -0.002). T1 self-control and T2 IGD played chain mediating roles in the associations between T1 school resources, T2 school victimization (β = -0.004, 95%CI: -0.008, -0.001) and T2 school bullying (β = -0.005, 95%CI: -0.008, -0.002). These findings supported the fifth hypothesis. Overall, these three problem behaviors might coexist in youth development, but fortunately, school resources could prevent or reduce them directly or indirectly via develo** a higher level of self-control ability.
Discussion
The outbreak of COVID-19 has brought many challenges to youth development. During this specific period, adolescents have suffered from more and more behavioral problems (Christner et al., 2021; Liu et al., 1990). Overall, self-control also plays a protective role in youth development during the post-pandemic period.
With regard to the interactions between problematic behaviors, the fourth hypothesis was also revealed. School bullying and victimization could predict each other concurrently in small-to-medium effect sizes, school victimization could predict bullying over time. IGD and school bullying concurrently predicted each other in small effect sizes. IGD and school victimization could also predict each other. Additionally, victimization could mediate the relationships between school resources, IGD, and bullying. Similarly, IGD mediated the relationships between school resources, bullying, and victimization. That is, once adolescents develop a problem behavior, they are more likely to engage in more problem behaviors if not timely and effectively intervened with (Jessor, 1987). These findings support several previous studies on the associations among problem behaviors (Kim et al., 2017; Huang et al., 2021; Li et al., 1990; Masten & Cicchetti, 2010; **ang et al., 2022b; Li et al., 2022). Moreover, these serial mediating effects also provide empirical support for the problem behavior theory, which claims that problem behaviors are determined by the interactions between the environmental system, personal system, and behavioral system (Jessor, 1987). Overall, it is necessary to jointly intervene in problem behaviors among adolescents.
Contributions and limitations
Theoretically, the current study has made several contributions to the related field. Initially, this study illustrates the importance of positive factors from individuals and schools in youth development during the recovery period of a public emergency. In combination with the previous evidence during the COVID-19 outbreak (Shek et al., 2021; **ang et al., 2022a), the current findings confirm the joint protective effects of positive factors on adolescent development during ordinary periods and emergencies. It encourages scholars to pay more attention to positive factors when researching developmental problems. Besides, the present study suggests the developmental cascading effects in the process of development. In a cross-level perspective, it reveals that the school environment will shape the development of self-control ability while this personal trait has significant effects on behavioral problems. From different aspects of the same level, the current finding confirms the chain reactions in different types of problem behaviors. This once again reminds scholars to focus on the mutual influence of various problems when exploring the causes and consequences, as individual development is a dynamic process that involves items affecting each other.
Additionally, the current study also provides some implications for related prevention and intervention programs. First, inferred from the current findings from school resources to developmental outcomes, schools may take on more responsibilities in promoting positive youth development. Specifically, schools have to create a free, equal, and harmonious environment and atmosphere for students and provide appropriate rules to monitor students’ performance at school. Teachers have to build good relationships with students, encouraging and supporting them when needed. In addition, schools need to actively engage with families to help young people deal with developmental problems. Second, apart from these external resources, schools should also guide and assist students to develop internal qualities and abilities, such as self-control capacity, through teaching activities or special programs. When a public emergency happens, such as the outbreak of COVID-19, it is often impossible for individuals to obtain external resources in time, but internal attributes function more effectively to protect individuals. Developmental psychologists have developed numerous programs to enhance individuals’ positive attributes. For instance, Shek and his team conducted the “Tin Ka ** P.A.T.H.S. Project” based on school activity in mainland China and significantly enhanced adolescents’ positive attributes (Zhu & Shek, 2020). Third, practitioners concerned with youth developmental issues are encouraged to conduct combined intervention programs to reduce or prevent adolescents’ problem behaviors, which is challenging to implement but may be more effective.
Despite these contributions to literature and practice, this study also has several limitations, pointing directions for future research. At first, the current study only recruited an adolescent sample from Central China, which limited the generalization of the current findings to young people from other cultures. Future studies may adopt a cross-cultural design to recruit diverse samples to obtain more general results. As for the data collection method, the self-reported questionnaires cannot avoid the unreal but socially expected responses. Future research is encouraged to use more objective approaches to collect data, such as other-reported questionnaires or experimental data. Another important limitation is the study design. The current study conducted a two-wave longitudinal design with a five-month time span, which is too short to examine the stability of the current findings. Scholars may adopt a longer follow-up study to obtain more stable results. Moreover, this study has attempted to reveal the interactions among different problem behaviors, but the current analytical approach may limit the examination of the chain effects among several problem behaviors due to the restriction of PROCESS Macro. Future research is encouraged to evaluate this developmental phenomenon through more advanced methods such as structural equation model techniques. Furthermore, the present study only chose school resources as environmental factors to investigate their positive effects on problematic behaviors. Actually, there are a large number of positive factors from family, school, community, and the whole society that could promote positive youth development and avoid negative outcomes. Scholars may pay more attention to other subsystems to explore more positive factors. And the comparative study of the protective factors and risk factors on adolescents’ problematic behaviors may also provide more critical guidance for practice. Last but also important, the current study only focused on the challenges that adolescents have faced during this pandemic. But recent research has also suggested that adolescents obtain positive experiences in this specific period, such as discovering oneself and connecting with family (Fioretti et al., 2020). Future studies may take a more integrative perspective to compare individuals’ positive and negative changes during this pandemic, which may provide more advice to promote adolescents’ psychological recovery in the post-pandemic era.
Conclusion
In summary, the results confirmed the assumptions about the multiple protective effects of school resources and self-control on adolescents’ problem behaviors. Specifically, school resources could negatively predict IGD and victimization, and self-control mediated these associations. Moreover, one problematic behavior could also mediate the associations between self-control and another problematic behavior. These findings contribute to the previous literature and several theories. Practically, these findings also provide some implications for practitioners to prevent or intervene in adolescents’ problem behaviors during the post-pandemic period.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Agnew, R., & White, H. R. (1992). An empirical test of general strain theory. Criminology, 30(4), 475–500. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01113.x
Bandura, A. (1978). Social learning theory of aggression. Journal of Communication, 28(3), 12–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1978.tb01621.x
Bear, G. G. (2010). School discipline and self-discipline: a practical guide to promoting prosocial student behavior. Guilford Press.
Benson, P. L., Scales, P. C., & Syvertsen, A. K. (2011). The contribution of the developmental assets framework to positive youth development theory and practice. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 41, 197–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-386492-5.00008-7
Chang, S., Guo, M., Wang, J., Wang, L., & Zhang, W. (2020). The influence of school assets on the development of well-being during early adolescence: longitudinal mediating effecr of intentional self-regulation. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 52(7), 874–885. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2020.00874
Chen, J. K., Wu, C., & Wang, L. C. (2021). Longitudinal associations between school engagement and bullying victimization in school and cyberspace in Hong Kong: latent variables and an autoregressive cross-lagged panel study. School Mental Health, 13(3), 462–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-021-09439-5
Cho, S., & Lee, J. R. (2021). Impacts of low self-control and delinquent peer associations on bullying growth trajectories among korean youth: a latent growth mixture modeling approach. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(7–8), NP4139-NP4169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518786495
Christner, N., Essler, S., Hazzam, A., & Paulus, M. (2021). Children’s psychological well-being and problem behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic: an online study during the lockdown period in Germany. PLoS One, 16(6), e0253473. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253473
De Figueiredo, C. S., Sandre, P. C., Portugal, L. C. L., Mázala-de-Oliveira, T., da Silva Chagas, L., Raony, Í, … Bomfim, P. O. S. (2021). COVID-19 pandemic impact on children and adolescents’ mental health: biological, environmental, and social factors. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 106, 110171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2020.110171
De Miranda, D. M., da Silva Athanasio, B., Oliveira, A. C. S., & Simoes-e-Silva, A. C. (2020). How is COVID-19 pandemic impacting mental health of children and adolescents? International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 51, 101845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101845
Deng, L., Wang, L., Xu, J., & Li, J. (2018). The relationships between inter-parental conflict, parent-adolescent conflict and bullying behaviors in juniro high school students. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 26(1), 118–122. https://doi.org/10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2018.01.026
Dou, K., Wang, L. X., Cheng, D. L., Li, Y. Y., & Zhang, M. C. (2022). Longitudinal association between poor parental supervision and risk-taking behavior: the role of self‐control and school climate. Journal of Adolescence, 94(4), 525–537. https://doi.org/10.1002/jad.12043
Fenny, O. A. (2021). Low self-control and school bullying: testing the GTC in nigerian sample of middle school students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 0886260521991286. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260521991286
Fioretti, C., Palladino, B. E., Nocentini, A., & Menesini, E. (2020). Positive and negative experiences of living in COVID-19 pandemic: analysis of italian adolescents’ narratives. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 599531. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.599531
Gan, X., Li, H., Li, M., Yu, C., **, X., Zhu, C., & Liu, Y. (2021). Parenting styles, depressive symptoms, and problematic online game use in adolescents: a developmental cascades model. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 710667.
Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Available online at: Stanford University Press.
Gu, M. (2020). A longitudinal study of daily hassles, internet expectancy, self-control, and problematic internet use in chinese adolescents: a moderated mediation model. Personality and Individual Differences, 152, 109571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109571
Hu, G., Bao, Z., Nie, T., Liu, Y., & Zhu, J. (2019). The association between corporal punishment and problem behaviors among chinese adolescents: the indirect role of self-control and school engagement. Child Indicators Research, 12(4), 1465–1479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-018-9592-x
Huang, J., Huebner, E. S., & Tian, L. (2021). Stability and changes in traditional and cyberbullying perpetration and victimization in childhood: the predictive role of depressive symptoms. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 08862605211028004. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211028004
Jeong, H., Yim, H. W., Lee, S. Y., Lee, H. K., Potenza, M. N., Jo, S. J., & Kim, G. (2020). Low self-control and aggression exert serial mediation between inattention/hyperactivity problems and severity of internet gaming disorder features longitudinally among adolescents. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 9(2), 401–409. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2020.00039
Jessor, R. (1987). Problem- behavior theory, psychosocial development, and adolescent problem drinking. British Journal of Addiction, 82(4), 331–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.1987.tb01490.x
Kim, J. Y., Lee, J. S., & Oh, S. (2017). A path model of school violence perpetration: introducing online game addiction as a new risk factor. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(21), 3205–3225.
Li, J. B., Leung, I. T. Y., & Li, Z. (2021a). The pathways from self-control at school to performance at work among novice kindergarten teachers: the mediation of work engagement and work stress. Children and Youth Services Review, 121, 105881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105881
Li, J. B., Bi, S. S., Willems, Y. E., & Finkenauer, C. (2021b). The association between school discipline and self-control from preschoolers to high school students: a three-level meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 91(1), 73–111.
Li, C., Song, Y., Wang, Q., & Zhang, B. (2021c). How does self-control affect academic achievement of adolescents? The dual perspectives of teacher-student relationship and mastery approach goals. Youth & Society, 0044118X211030949. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X211030949
Li, H., Gan, X., **ang, G. X., Zhou, T., Wang, P., **, X., & Zhu, C. (2022). Peer victimization and problematic online game use among chinese adolescents: the dual mediating effect of deviant peer affiliation and school connectedness. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 823762–823762. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.823762
Li, J. B., Delvecchio, E., Lis, A., Nie, Y. G., & Di Riso, D. (2015). Parental attachment, self-control, and depressive symptoms in chinese and italian adolescents: test of a mediation model. Journal of Adolescence, 43, 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.06.006
Li, J. B., Liberska, H., Salcuni, S., & Delvecchio, E. (2019a). Aggressive perpetration and victimization among polish male and female adolescents: the role of attachment to parents and self-control. Crime & Delinquency, 65(3), 401–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128718787472
Li, J., Sidibe, A. M., Shen, X., & Hesketh, T. (2019b). Incidence, risk factors and psychosomatic symptoms for traditional bullying and cyberbullying in chinese adolescents. Children and Youth Services Review, 107, 104511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104511
Liang, Q., Yu, C., **ng, Q., Liu, Q., & Chen, P. (2021). The influence of parental knowledge and basic psychological needs satisfaction on peer victimization and internet gaming disorder among chinese adolescents: a mediated moderation model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(5), 2397. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052397
Liu, Q., Zhou, Y., **e, X., Xue, Q., Zhu, K., Wan, Z., … Song, R. (2021a). The prevalence of behavioral problems among school-aged children in home quarantine during the COVID-19 pandemic in China. Journal of Affective Disorders, 279, 412–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.10.008
Liu, Y., Gong, R., Yu, Y., Xu, C., Yu, X., Chang, R., … Cai, Y. (2021b). Longitudinal predictors for incidence of internet gaming disorder among adolescents: the roles of time spent on gaming and depressive symptoms. Journal of Adolescence, 92, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2021.06.008
Ma, N., Zhang, W., Yu, C. F., Zhu, J. J., Jiang, Y. P., & Wu, T. (2017). Perceived school climate and internet gaming disorder in junior school students: a moderated mediation model. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 25(1), 65–69.
Masten, A. S., & Cicchetti, D. (2010). Developmental cascades. Development and Psychopathology, 22(3), 491–495. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579410000222
Nie, Q., Yang, C., Stomski, M., Zhao, Z., Teng, Z., & Guo, C. (2021). Longitudinal link between bullying victimization and bullying perpetration: a multilevel moderation analysis of perceived school climate. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 0886260521997940. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260521997940
Pakarinen, E., Silinskas, G., Hamre, B. K., Metsäpelto, R. L., Lerkkanen, M. K., Poikkeus, A. M., & Nurmi, J. E. (2018). Cross-lagged associations between problem behaviors and teacher-student relationships in early adolescence. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 38(8), 1100–1141.
Pratt, T. C., Turanovic, J. J., Fox, K. A., & Wright, K. A. (2014). Self-control and victimization: a meta‐analysis. Criminology, 52(1), 87–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12030
Reaves, S., McMahon, S. D., Duffy, S. N., & Ruiz, L. (2018). The test of time: a meta-analytic review of the relation between school climate and problem behavior. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 39, 100–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.01.006
Scales, P. C. (2011). Youth developmental assets in global perspective: results from international adaptations of the developmental assets profile. Child Indicators Research, 4(4), 619–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-011-9112-8
Scales, P. C., Benson, P. L., Leffert, N., & Blyth, D. A. (2000). Contribution of developmental assets to the prediction of thriving among adolescents. Applied Developmental Science, 4(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532480XADS0401_3
Shek, D. T., Zhao, L., Dou, D., Zhu, X., & **ao, C. (2021). The impact of positive youth development attributes on posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms among chinese adolescents under COVID-19. Journal of Adolescent Health, 68(4), 676–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.01.011
Sun, Y., Li, J. B., Oktaufik, M. P. M., & Vazsonyi, A. T. (2022). Parental attachment and externalizing behaviors among chinese adolescents: the mediating role of self-control. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 31(4), 923–933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-021-02071-6
Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72(2), 271–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00263.x
Teng, Z., Bear, G. G., Yang, C., Nie, Q., & Guo, C. (2020). Moral disengagement and bullying perpetration: a longitudinal study of the moderating effect of school climate. School Psychology, 35(1), 99. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000348
Tu, K. C., Chen, S. S., & Mesler, R. M. (2021). Trait self-construal, inclusion of others in the self and self-control predict stay-at-home adherence during COVID-19. Personality and Individual Differences, 175, 110687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110687
Unger, A., Bi, C., **ao, Y. Y., & Ybarra, O. (2016). The revising of the tangney self-control scale for chinese students. PsyCh Journal, 5(2), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.128
Wachs, S., Mazzone, A., Milosevic, T., Wright, M. F., Blaya, C., Gámez-Guadix, M., & Norman, J. O. H. (2021). Online correlates of cyberhate involvement among young people from ten european countries: an application of the routine activity and problem behaviour theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 123, 106872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106872
World Health Organization (2022). Weekly epidemiological update on COVID-19–18 May 2022. Retrieved May 25, 2022, from https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/weekly-epidemiological-update-on-covid-19---18-may-2022
**ang, G. X., Gan, X., **, X., & Zhang, Y. H. (2022a). The more developmental assets, the less internet gaming disorder? Testing the cumulative effect and longitudinal mechanism during the COVID-19 pandemic. Current Psychology, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03790-9
**ang, G. X., Gan, X., **, X., Zhang, Y. H., & Zhu, C. S. (2022b). Developmental assets, self-control and internet gaming disorder in adolescence: Testing a moderated mediation model in a longitudinal study. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 808264. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.808264
Xu, P., & Cheng, J. (2021). Individual differences in social distancing and mask-wearing in the pandemic of COVID-19: the role of need for cognition, self-control and risk attitude. Personality and Individual Differences, 175, 110706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110706
Yu, C., Li, X., & Zhang, W. (2015). Predicting adolescent problematic online game use from teacher autonomy support, basic psychological needs satisfaction, and school engagement: a 2-year longitudinal study. Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking, 18(4), 228–233. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2014.0385
Yu, Y., Peng, L., Mo, P. K., Yang, X., Cai, Y., Ma, L., … Lau, J. T. (2022). Association between relationship adaptation and internet gaming disorder among first-year secondary school students in China: mediation effects via social support and loneliness. Addictive Behaviors, 125, 107166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.107166
Zhang, D., Huebner, E. S., & Tian, L. (2020). Longitudinal associations among neuroticism, depression, and cyberbullying in early adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 112, 106475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106475
Zhang, Y., Yu, C., & Zhang, W. (2017). Psychosocial and social factors of adolescnet’s internet gaming disorder. China Journal of Health Psychology, 25(7), 1058–1061. https://doi.org/10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2017.07.024
Zhu, X., & Shek, D. T. (2020). Impact of a positive youth development program on junior high school students in mainland China: a pioneer study. Children and Youth Services Review, 114, 105022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105022
Zou, H., Deng, Y., Wang, H., Yu, C., & Zhang, W. (2022). Perceptions of school climate and internet gaming addiction among chinese adolescents: the mediating effect of deviant peer affiliation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(6), 3604. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063604
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by Youth project of the Ministry of Education in 2020 in the 13th Five-Year Plan of National Education Science: The heterogeneous developmental trajectory of Internet gaming disorder in adolescents: the combined action of parenting environment and genetic polymorphism (grant number: EBA200391) to **ong Gan. We thank the students for their participation and the reviewers for their constructive suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Concept and design: X. Gan; Data collection: K. N. Qin, X. ** and P. Y. Wang; Statistical analysis: G. X. **ang and H. Li; Drafting of the manuscript: G. X. **ang; Critical revision of the manuscript: G. X. **ang and H. Li.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors have expressed agreement with the order of authorship and contents of the manuscript. The authors have no conflicts of interests that might be interpreted as influencing the research.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
**ang, GX., Li, H., Gan, X. et al. School resources, self-control and problem behaviors in Chinese adolescents: a longitudinal study in the post-pandemic era. Curr Psychol 43, 15055–15067 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-04178-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-04178-5