SpringerLink
Log in

Use of Open Access Channels for Scholarly Publishing in Kenyan Universities

  • Published:
Publishing Research Quarterly Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study investigated the awareness and use of open access (OA) channels for scholarly publishing by researchers at selected universities in Kenya. A sample of 341 faculty members, from three public universities, was selected for the study. A questionnaire was used as the main data collection instrument. The findings revealed that there is a considerably high level of awareness among the researchers; librarians were the main channel with regard to creating awareness; the OA channels that are more frequently used by researchers are OA journals, OA institutional repositories and OA e-books; the researchers mostly published/disseminated theses and dissertations, conference proceedings and workshop/seminar presentations through OA channels; and searching and accessing research articles, develo** research proposals and formulating research problems were among the main reasons why researchers used open access channels. There are several reasons why researchers sometimes do not use OA channels for research. The study makes several recommendations for the adoption and effective use of OA channels in the selected universities and beyond.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. AU. Five-year science, technology and innovation plan of action 2019–2024. Addis Ababa: UNESCO Liaison Office; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berbusse M. What is “open access” publishing anyway? Aesthetic Surg J. 2012;33(2):290–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bjork B-C. Open access to scientific publications—an analysis of the barriers to change. Inf Res. 2004;9(2):170.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Britz J. Open access: challenges and barriers to African scholars, Inkanyiso. J Hum Sci. 2009;1(1):22–6.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI). Available: http://www.soros.org/openaccess/read.shtml. 2002. Accessed 22 Apr 2015.

  6. Chilimo W. Institutional Repositories awareness and self-archiving practices of academic researchers in selected Public Universities in Kenya. Paper presented at the 4th CODESRIA Conference on Electronic Publishing, Dakar, Senegal, March 30–April 1, 2016.

  7. Chilimo W, Adem A, Otieno ANW, Maina M. Adoption of open access publishing by academic researchers in Kenya. J Schol Publish. 2017;49(1):103–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Christian GE. Open Access initiative and develo** world. Afr J Lib Arch Inf Sci. 2008;18(1):1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Coonin B, Younce LM. Publishing in open access educational journals: the authors perspectives. Behav Soc Sci Libr. 2010;29(2):118–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Davis P et al. Report of the CUL Task Force on Open Access Publishing; Presented to the Cornell University Library Management Team; 2004. https://ecommons.cornell.edu/bitstream/handle/1813/193/OATF_Report_8-9.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y. Accessed 19 May 2020.

  11. De Angelis T. Debating access to scientific data. PA Monitor 35(2). Available: http://www.apa.org/monitor/feb04/debating.aspx. 2004. Accessed 18 Feb 2016.

  12. Deoghuria S, Roy S (2007) Open Access: what scientists think? A survey of researchers’ attitude towards OA. ICSD-2007. http://drtc.isibang.ac.in/bitstream/1849/314/1/081_P32_swapan_deoghuria_formatted.pdf Accessed 4 May 2016.

  13. Donovan JM, Watson C. Citation advantage of open access legal scholarship. Law Libr J. 2011;103(4):553–73.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dulle FW. Open access publishing: the emerging opportunity for wider dissemination of scholarly output. A paper presented at PANTIL Annual Research Workshop 6–9 October, 2008, Dodoma, Tanzania; 2008.

  15. Dulle FW. An analysis of open access scholarly communication in Tanzanian public universities. Pretoria: University of South Africa; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dulle FW, Minishi-Majanja MK, Cloete LM. Factors influencing the adoption of OA scholarly communication in Tanzanian public universities. Presented at the World Library and Information Congress: 76th IFLA General Conference and Assembly; 2010. http://www.ifla.org/en/ifla76. Accessed 4 April 2016.

  17. Ehrenfest DMD, Sammartino G, Bernard JP. The Periodontology, Oral Surgery, Esthetic and Implant Dentistry Organization (POSEIDO) and Open Journal: an international academic and scientific community for a new approach of open-access publishing. POSEIDO J. 2013;1(1):1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fitzgerald B, Fitzgerald A, Perry M, Kiel-Chisholm S, Driscoll E, Thampapillai D, Coates J. OAK Law Project Report No. 1: creating a legal framework for copyright management of open access within the Australian academic and research sector; 2006. http://www.oaklaw.qut.edu.au/reports. Accessed 13 February 2017.

  19. Hjort J, Poulsen J. The arrival of fast Internet and employment in Africa. Am Econ Rev. 2019;109(3):1032–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kenya Library and Information Services Consortium (KLISC). 2013. http://www.eifl.net/kenyalibraries-and-information-services-consortium. Accessed 15 August 2015.

  21. Khalili L. An investigation of factors influencing the acceptance of open access publishing among medical researchers in Iran. PhD thesis, University of Malaya; 2011.

  22. Khan K, Hamid MS. Open access journals in the field of law: a global perspective. Libr Inf Sci. 2014;2(1):7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Litman J. The Economics of Open-Access Law Publishing. Lewis Clark Law Review, 2006;10:779.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mammo Y, Ngulube P. Academics’ use and attitude towards OA in selected higher learning institutions of Ethiopia. Inf Dev. 2013;31(1):13–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mann F, Walter B, Hess T, Wigand RF. OA publishing in science: why it is highly appreciated but rarely used; 2008. http://openaccessstudy.com/Mann_et_al_2008_Open_Access_Publishing_in_Science.pdf. Accessed 5 June 2016.

  26. Matheka DM, Nderitu J, Mutonga D, Otiti MI, Siegel K, Demai, AR. OA: academic publishing and its implications for knowledge equity in Kenya. Globalization and Health. 2014;10(26):1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mishra S, Das AK. Sharing your work in open access, [Open Access for Researchers, 5]. Paris: UNESCO; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Meho LI, Yang K. Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of Science versus Scopus and Google Scholar. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2007;58(13):2105–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Moller AM. The rise of OA journals: their viability and prospects for African scholarly community. Afr Med Rev. 2006;15(1 & 2):1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Morrison H. Scholarly communication for librarians. Oxford: Chandos Publishing; 2009.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Nariani R, Fernandez L. OA publishing: what authors want; 2012. http://crl.acrl.org/content/73/2/182.full.pdf+html. Accessed 14 April 2016.

  32. Nicholas D, Rowlands I. Social media use in the research workflow. Inf Serv Use. 2011;31(1–2):61–83.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Nwagwu WE, Onyancha OB. Back to the beginning—the journal is dead, long live science. J Acad Librar. 2015;41:669–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Obuh AO, Bozimo DO. Awareness and use of OA scholarly publications by LIS lecturers in Southern Nigeria. Int J Libr Sci. 2012;1(4):54–60.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Onyancha OB. Self-archiving by LIS schools in South Africa: practices, challenges and opportunities. ESARBICA J. 2011;30:66–84.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Onyancha OB. Social media and research: an assessment of the coverage of South African universities in Research Gate, Web of Science and the Webometrics Ranking of World Universities. S Afr J Libr Inf Sci. 2015;81(1):8–20.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Onyancha OB. Open research data in sub-Saharan Africa: a bibliometric study using the Data Citation Index. Publish Res Q. 2016;32:227–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Otando R. Building institutional repositories in KLISC member institutions in Kenya: current status and emerging challenges. UoN Repository, 2011. http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/handle/123456789/25736. Accessed 22 May 2015.

  39. Pappalardo KM, Fitzgerald BF, Fitzgerald AM, Kiel-Chisholm SD, Georgiades J, Austin AC. Understanding OA in the academic environment: a guide for authors. Queensland University of Technology; 2008.

  40. Park J-H, Qin J. Exploring the willingness of scholars to accept OA: a grounded theory approach. J Schol Publish. 2007;38(2):55–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Plotin SL. Legal scholarship, electronic publishing, and open access: transformation or steadfast stagnation? Law Libr J. 2009;101(1):31–57.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Poynder R. The OA interviews: Stevan Harnad. Open and Shut, (July 1, 2007),

  43. Republic of Kenya. Ministry of Science and Technology. Science, technology and innovation policy and strategy. Nairobi: Ministry of Science and Technology; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Republic of South Africa. Department of Higher Education and Training. 2015. Research output policy, 2015: Government Gazette Notice, No. 38552. Pretoria: Republic of South Africa.

  45. Rodriguez JE. Awareness and attitudes about open access publishing: a glance at generational differences. J Acad Librar. 2014;40(6):604–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Rowland F. Where is scholarly publishing going? In: Gorman GE, Rowland F, editors. Scholarly publishing in an electronic era. London: Facet Publishing; 2005. p. 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Sanchez-Tarrago N, Fernandez-Molina JC. The OA movement and Cuban health research work: an author survey. Health Inf Libr J. 2009;27(1):66–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Sawe E, Musangi PS. Management of university research output in digital era: a case of Strathmore University; 2015. http s://suplusstrathmore.edu/bitstream/handle/11071/3671/Emily%20Sawe%20KLA%20Conference%2Paper-2.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y. Accessed 10 June 2016.

  49. Suber P. Removing the barriers to research: an introduction to OA for librarians. College Res Libr News. 2003;64(2):92–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Utulu SC, Bolarinwa O. Open access initiatives adoption by Nigerian academics. Libr Rev. 2009;58(9):660–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Velterop J. Should scholarly societies embrace OA or is it the kiss of death? Learn Publish. 2003;16:167–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Willinsky J. The access principle: The case for open access to research and scholarship. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Yang ZY, Li Y. University faculty awareness and attitudes towards Open Access publishing and the Institutional Repository: a case study. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication. 2015;3(1):eP1210. https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.1210.

  54. Yiotis K. The open access initiative: a new paradigm for scholarly communications. Inform Technol Libr. 2005;24(4):157–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper is an extract from the first author’s PhD thesis, which was supervised by the second author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Library, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya

    Mercy W. Waithaka

  2. Department of Information Science, University of South Africa (Unisa), Post Office Box 392, Pretoria, 0003, South Africa

    Mercy W. Waithaka & Omwoyo Bosire Onyancha

Authors
  1. Mercy W. Waithaka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Omwoyo Bosire Onyancha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mercy W. Waithaka.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Waithaka, M.W., Onyancha, O.B. Use of Open Access Channels for Scholarly Publishing in Kenyan Universities. Pub Res Q 37, 293–306 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-021-09795-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-021-09795-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation