Log in

Minimum cost berth allocation problem in maritime logistics: new mixed integer programming models

  • Published:
Sādhanā Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The berth allocation problem (BAP) involves decisions on how to allocate the berth space and to sequence maritime vessels that are to be loaded and unloaded at a container terminal involved in the maritime logistics. As the berth is a critical resource in a container terminal, an effective use of it is highly essential to have efficient berthing and servicing of vessels, and to optimize the associated costs. This study focuses on the minimum cost berth allocation problem (MCBAP) at a container terminal where the maritime vessels arrive dynamically. The objective comprises the waiting time penalty, tardiness penalty, handling cost and benefit of early service completion of vessels. This paper proposes three computationally efficient mixed integer linear programming (MILP) models for the MCBAP. Through numerical experiments, the proposed MILP models are compared to an existing model in the literature to evaluate their computational performance. The computational study with problem instances of various problem characteristics demonstrates the computational efficiency of the proposed models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development) 2018 Review of maritime transport 2018

  2. Wang F and Lim A 2007 A stochastic beam search for the berth allocation problem. Decis. Support Syst. 42: 2186–2196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bierwirth C and Meisel F 2010 A survey of berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems in container terminals. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 202: 615–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bierwirth C and Meisel F 2015 A follow-up survey of berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems in container terminals. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 244: 675–689

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Hansen P, Oǧuz C and Mladenović N 2008 Variable neighborhood search for minimum cost berth allocation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 191: 636–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Imai A, Nishimura E and Papadimitriou S 2001 The dynamic berth allocation problem for a container port. Transp. Res. Part B 35: 401–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Imai A, Nagaiwa K and Tat C W 1997 Efficient planning of berth allocation for container terminals in Asia. J. Adv. Transp. 31: 75–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Imai A, Nishimura E and Papadimitriou S 2003 Berth allocation with service priority. Transp. Res. Part B 37: 437–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cordeau J F, Laporte G, Legato P and Moccia L 2005 Models and tabu search heuristics for the berth-allocation problem. Transp. Sci. 39: 526–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liang C, Huang Y and Yang Y 2009 A quay crane dynamic scheduling problem by hybrid evolutionary algorithm for berth allocation planning. Comput. Ind. Eng. 56: 1021–1028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kovač N, Stanimirović Z and Davidović T 2018 Metaheuristic approaches for the minimum cost hybrid berth allocation problem. In: Konstantopoulos C and Pantziou G (Eds.) Modeling, Computing and Data Handling Methodologies for Maritime Transportation. Cham: Springer, pp. 1–47

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lim A 1998 The berth planning problem. Oper. Res. Lett. 22: 105–110

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Golias M M, Boile M and Theofanis S 2010 A lamda-optimal based heuristic for the berth scheduling problem. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 18: 794–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kovač N 2017 Metaheuristic approaches for the berth allocation problem. Yugosl. J. Oper. Res. 27: 265–289

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Park Y and Kim K H 2003 A scheduling method for berth and quay cranes. OR Spectr. 25: 1–23

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Imai A 2008 The simultaneous berth and quay crane allocation problem. Transp. Res. Part E 44: 900–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ernst A T, Oğuz C, Singh G and Taherkhani G 2017 Mathematical models for the berth allocation problem in dry bulk terminals. J. Sched. 20: 459–473

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Pratap S, Nayak A, Kumar A, Cheikhrouhou N and Tiwari M K 2017 An integrated decision support system for berth and ship unloader allocation in bulk material handling port. Comput. Ind. Eng. 106: 386–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Anoop K P, Panicker V V, Narayanan M and Kumar C T S 2018 A mathematical model and solution methods for rail freight transportation planning in an Indian food grain supply chain. Sādhanā 43: 1–20

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Madankumar S and Rajendran C 2019 A mixed integer linear programming model for the vehicle routing problem with simultaneous delivery and pickup by heterogeneous vehicles, and constrained by time windows. Sādhanā 44: 1–14

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Hansen P and Oguz C 2003 A note on formulations of static and dynamic berth allocation problems. Les Cah du GERAD G-2003-30 HEC Montréal

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors are thankful to the reviewer and the Editor for their constructive suggestions and comments to improve the initial version of our manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chandrasekharan Rajendran.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jos, B.C., Harimanikandan, M., Rajendran, C. et al. Minimum cost berth allocation problem in maritime logistics: new mixed integer programming models. Sādhanā 44, 149 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-019-1128-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-019-1128-7

Keywords

Navigation