Abstract
In this second part of the article, we present how S N Bose’s 1924 paper provided a systematic derivation of Planck’s formula using the conception of photons, filling the major lacuna that was preventing the acceptance of the photon concept by the physics community. This derivation further widened the chasm between classical conceptions and the actual behaviour of the microscopic world as already heralded by the photon proposal. In particular, the very concept of a quantum as an ‘independent’ entity even when not interacting with other entities was rendered invalid. Classical intuition was subverted in Bose’s derivation by a new rule, regarding counting of independent states of the system rather than counting individual quanta. We discuss the implications of the quantum mechanics that eventually emerged, showing that the seeds of some of its uncanny conceptual content were already foreshadowed in Einstein’s proposal. While he was instrumental in setting off the revolution, the full implications of the revolution became unpalatable to him. We may expect that as experiments make the quantum world more familiar, the currently projected enigmas will gradually disappear.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wikipedia articles for various specifics of dates, personalities and experiments.
Einstein's Miraculous Year: Five Papers that Changed the Face of Physics, edited and introduced by John J Stachel, Princeton University Press, 1998.
Abraham Pais, Subtle is the Lord: The Science and the Life of Albert Einstein, Oxford University Press, 1982.
Abraham Pais, Inward Bound: Of Matter and Forces in the Physical World, Oxford University Press, 1988.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Urjit A Yajnik is Institute Chair Professor, Department of Physics IIT Bombay. His areas of interest are unified theories, supersymmetry, general theory of relativity and cosmology.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yajnik, U.A. The conception of photons–Part II. Reson 21, 49–69 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12045-016-0295-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12045-016-0295-7