Abstract
The characterization of the reservoir rock's geomechanical properties is critical to address wellbore instabilities and subsidence-related issues. To address these issues, lab-derived dynamic and static elastic properties are essential to match the in-situ rock properties. In this study, as part of a new integrated workflow P-wave and S-wave velocities are congregated using ultrasonic transducers for the core plugs, which constitutes mainly carbonates, shales, and both. Mineral composition, shale anisotropy, seismic velocities, and cross plots are studied to understand shear wave splitting. During this study, as a part of 1D mechanical Earth models, rock elastic properties are calculated for 60 wells using petrophysical logs (gamma, density, acoustic and caliper). Also, triaxial loading tests are conducted on 14 specimens collected from the same wells, static Poisson's ratio and static Young's modulus are computed from the stress-strain curves. The major differences are observed between static and dynamic elastic properties calculated from well logs and lab tests. Cohesion and friction angle for rock samples are estimated from the triaxial tests under different confining pressures. The objective of this study is to compare the elastic properties derived from the ultrasonic method with well logs and fill the gaps in the 1D geomechanical model. The combined analysis of elastic properties from different methods provides exciting insights on wellbore stability in anisotropic rock.
Abbreviations
- PR dy :
-
Dynamic Poisson’s ratio
- E dyn :
-
Dynamic Young’s modulus (GPa)
- K :
-
Bulk modulus (GPa)
- G, µ :
-
Shear modulus (GPa)
- 1D MEM:
-
One-dimensional mechanical Earth model
- V p, υ p :
-
Compressional wave velocity (m/s)
- V s, υ s :
-
Shear wave velocity (m/s)
- UVW:
-
Ultrasonic wave velocity (m/s)
- ISRM:
-
International Society of Rock Mechanics
- T p :
-
Travelling time (sec)
- σ 1 :
-
Vertical load (psi)
- σ 2, σ 3 :
-
Horizontal loads (psi)
- kN:
-
Kilo Newton
- Co :
-
Cohesion
- µ i :
-
Coefficient of internal friction angle
- ASTM:
-
American Society for Testing and Materials
- E sat :
-
Static Young’s modulus
- UCSlimestone :
-
Unconfined compressive strength of limestone
- UCSshale :
-
Unconfined compressive strength of shale
- mD:
-
Milli Darcy
- YM :
-
Young’s modulus
- PR :
-
Poisson’s ratio
- MPa:
-
Mega Pascals
References
Abass H, Shebatalhamd A, Khan M, Al-Shobaili Y, Ansari A, Ali S and Mehta S 2006 Wellbore instability of shale formation: Zuluf Field, Saudi Arabia; Paper presented at the SPE Technical Symposium of Saudi Arabia Section, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, https://doi.org/10.2118/106345-MS.
Assefa S, McCann C and Sothcott J 2003 Velocities of compressional and shear waves in limestones; Geophys. Prospect. 51 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2003.00349.x.
ASTM Int 2000 Laboratory determination̄ of pulse velocities and ultrasonic elastic constants of rock; Designation: D 2845-00 14 1–9.
Bieniawski Z T and Bernede M J 1979 Suggested methods for determining the uniaxial compressive strength and deformability of rock materials: Part 1. Suggested method for determining deformability of rock materials in uniaxial compression; Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 16 138–140, https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(79)91451-7.
Birch F 1960 The velocity of compressional waves in rocks to 10 kilobars: 1; J. Geophys. Res. 65(4) 1083–1102, https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ065i004p01083.
Chang C, Zoback M D and Khaksar A 2006 Empirical relations between rock strength and physical properties in sedimentary rocks; J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 51 223–237, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2006.01.003.
Fjaer E, Holt R M, Horsrud P, Raaen A M and Risnes R 1992 Petroleum Related Rock Mechanics, 1st edn, Elsevier Science Publishers, 33 337p.
Fjaer E, Horsrud P, Raaen A M and Holt R M 2008 Petroleum Related Rock Mechanics, 2nd edn, Elsevier Science Publishers, 53 514p.
Garia S, Pal A K, Ravi K and Nair A M 2019 A comprehensive analysis on the relationships between elastic wave velocities and petrophysical properties of sedimentary rocks based on laboratory measurements; J. Pet. Explor. Prod. Technol. 9 1869–1881, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-019-0675-0.
Hicks W G and Berry J E 1956 Application of continuous velocity logs to determination of fluid saturation of reservoir rocks; Geophysics 21 739–754, https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1438267.
Horsrud P 2001 Estimating mechanical properties of shale from empirical correlations; SPE Drill. Complet. 16 68–73, https://doi.org/10.2118/56017-PA.
Hughes D S and Cross J H 1951 Elastic wave velocities in rocks at high pressures and temperatures; Geophysics 16 577–593, https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1437706.
Ide J M 1937 The velocity of sound in rocks and glasses as a function of temperature; J. Geol. 45 689–716, https://doi.org/10.1086/624595.
Kahraman S 2007 The correlations between the saturated and dry P-wave velocity of rocks; Ultrasonics 46 341–348, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2007.05.003.
Kassab M A and Weller A 2011 Porosity estimation from compressional wave velocity: A study based on Egyptian sandstone formations; J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 78 310–315, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2011.06.011.
Kassab M A and Weller A 2015 Study on P-wave and S-wave velocity in dry and wet sandstones of Tushka region, Egypt; Egypt. J. Pet. 24 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpe.2015.02.001.
McNally G 1987 Estimation of coal measures rock strength using sonic and neutron logs; Geoexploration 24 381–395, https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7142(87)90008-1.
Riazi N, Clarkson C R, Ghanizadeh A, Vahedian A, Aquino S and Wood J M 2017 Determination of elastic properties of tight rocks from ultrasonic measurements: Examples from the Montney Formation (Alberta, Canada); Fuel 196 442–457, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.01.084.
Szwedzicki T 2007 A hypothesis on modes of failure of rock samples tested in uniaxial compression; Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 40 97–104, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-006-0096-5.
Tao G, King M S and Nabi-Bidhendi M 1995 Ultrasonic wave propagation in dry and brine-saturated sandstones as a function of effective stress: Laboratory measurements and modelling; Geophys. Prospect. 43 299–327, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1995.tb00255.x.
Zhang Y and Zhang J 2017 Lithology-dependent minimum horizontal stress and in-situ stress estimate; Tectonophys. 703 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2017.03.002.
Zoback M D 2007 Reservoir Geomechanics; Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511586477.
Acknowledgements
Authors extend their gratitude to Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC) and Baker Hughes for their continuous support to make this research work possible and thank ONGC-Mumbai and CEWELL-Baroda for providing data for this research under the PAN IIT project. We also thank our supervisor for his uninterrupted support and for providing the lab facilities for conducting the experiments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Venkatesh Ambati: Performed the lab and analytic calculations and computations, implemented and interpreted the study, and contributed in the write-up of initial and final version of the paper. Shashank Sharma: Carried out the lab experiments, contributed in analytical work, visualization, data curation, and write-up of the initial version. Nagendra Babu M: Contributed in data analysis, interpreting the results and worked on the final draft preparation. Rajesh R Nair: Designed the study, project administration, interpretation of complete results, write-up of final version of the manuscript and overall supervision of the work.
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by N V Chalapathi Rao
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ambati, V., Sharma, S., Babu, M.N. et al. Laboratory measurements of ultrasonic wave velocities of rock samples and their relation to log data: A case study from Mumbai offshore. J Earth Syst Sci 130, 176 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-021-01696-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-021-01696-x