Log in

Evaluation of pirarubicin–cisplatin chemotherapy in the treatment for refractory and recurrent high-grade osteosarcoma: experience of a single institute

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Medical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of pirarubicin (THP)–cisplatin (DDP) chemotherapy for refractory and recurrent high-grade osteosarcoma. Between 2008 and 2010, 23 patients with refractory and recurrent high-grade osteosarcoma were included in this analysis. THP was given at a dose of 50 mg/m2 i.v. d1 and DDP 100–120 mg/m2 i.v. d2–3 every 3 weeks. Treatment was continued until evidence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Tumor response was usually evaluated every two chemotherapy cycles by CT/MRI scan. The primary end point was overall response rate, secondary endpoint including progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate, and toxicities. A total of 68 cycles were given, median 2 per patient (range 2–7). Overall response rate was 13% and disease control rate was 34.5%, with 3 partial responses and 5 stable diseases. Median time to progression and overall survival time were 2 (95%CI 2–11) and 10 months (95%CI 6–23), respectively. Major severe toxicities were grade 3 or 4 leucopenia occurred 12 times (17.7%) in total cycles; Mild toxicities included grade 1 or 2 nausea and vomiting (80.9%), leucopenia (61.8%), fatigue (50.0%), and alopecia (79.4%). THP–DDP regimen chemotherapy represents an active and well-tolerated treatment for Chinese refractory and recurrent high-grade osteosarcoma patients. Further assessment is necessary to confirm the safety and efficacy of this treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ta HT, Dass CR, Choong PF, Dunstan DE. Osteosarcoma treatment: state of the art. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2009;28:247–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wilkins RM, Cullen JW, Odom L, Jamroz BA, Cullen PM, et al. Superior survival in treatment of primary non-metastatic pediatric osteosarcoma of the extremity. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:498–507.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bielack SS, Kempf-Bielack B, Delling G, Exner GU, Flege S, et al. Prognostic factors in high-grade osteosarcoma of the extremities or trunk: an analysis of 1,702 patients treated on neoadjuvant cooperative osteosarcoma study group protocols. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:776–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Enneking WF. An abbreviated history of orthopaedic oncology in North America. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;374:l15–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Arndt CA, Crist WM. Common musculoskeletal tumors of childhood and adolescence. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(5):342–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ward WG, Mikaelian K, Dorey F, Mirra JM, Sassoon A, et al. Pulmonary metastases of stage IIB extremity osteosarcoma and subsequent pulmonary metastases. J Clin Oncol. 1994;12:1849–58.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Patel SR, Vadhan-Raj S, Papadopolous N, Plager C, Burgess MA, et al. High-dose ifosfamide in bone and soft tissue sarcomas: results of phase II and pilot studies-dose response and schedule dependence. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15:2378–84.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kebudi R, Gorgun O, Ayan I. Oral etoposide for recurrent/progressive sarcomas of childhood. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2004;42:320–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Seibel NL, Krailo M, Chen Z, Healey J, Breitfeld PP, et al. Upfront window trial of topotecan in previously untreated children and adolescents with poor prognosis metastatic osteosarcoma: children’s Cancer Group (CCG) 7943. Cancer. 2007;109:1646–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Crews KR, Stewart CF, Liu T, Rodriguez-Galindo C, Santana VM, et al. Effect of fractionated ifosfamide on the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan in pediatric patients with osteosarcoma. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2004;26:764–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bond M, Bernstein ML, Pappo A, Schultz KR, Krailo M, et al. A phase II study of imatinib mesylate in children with refractory or relapsed solid tumors. A children’s oncology group study. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2008;50:254–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. De Sio L, Milano GM, Castellano A, Jenkner A, Fidani P, et al. Temozolamide in resistant or relapsed pediatric solid tumors. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2006;47:30–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zou HY, Wu HL, Zhang Y, Li SF, Nie JF, et al. Studying the interaction of pirarubicin with DNA and determining pirarubicin in human urine samples: combining excitation—emission fluorescence matrices with second-order calibration methods. J Fluoresc. 2009;19:955–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sridhar KS, Hussein AM, Benedetto P, Ardalan B, Savaraj N, et al. Phase II trial of 4’-0-tetrahydropyranyladriamycin (pirarubicin) in head and neck carcinoma. Cancer. 1992;70:1591–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tsurumi H, Hara T, Goto N, Kanemura N, Kasahara S, et al. A phase II study of a THP-COP regimen for the treatment of elderly patients aged 70 years or older with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Hematol Oncol. 2007;25:107–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Shinozaki T, Watanabe H, Yanagawa T, Shirakura K, Takagishi K. Pirarubicin-based versus doxorubicin-based osteosarcoma chemotherapy. Ann Pharmacother. 2002;36:996–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhao H, Yao Y, Wang Z, Lin F, Sun Y, et al. Therapeutic effect of pirarubicin-based chemotherapy for osteosarcoma patients with lung metastasis. J Chemother. 2010;22:119–24.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:205–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Navid F, Willert JR, McCarville MB, Furman W, Watkins A, et al. Combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel in the treatment of children and young adults with refractory bone sarcoma. Cancer. 2008;113:419–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Berger M, Grignani G, Ferrari S, Biasin E, Brach del Prever A, et al. Phase 2 trial of two courses of cyclophosphamide and etoposide for relapsed high-risk osteosarcoma patients. Cancer. 2009;115:2980–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yang Yao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Qi, WX., He, AN., Tang, LN. et al. Evaluation of pirarubicin–cisplatin chemotherapy in the treatment for refractory and recurrent high-grade osteosarcoma: experience of a single institute. Med Oncol 29, 2229–2233 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-011-0021-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-011-0021-y

Keywords

Navigation