Log in

The Use of Standardized Management Protocols for Critically Ill Patients with Non-traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Neurocritical Care Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of standardized management protocols (SMPs) may improve patient outcomes for some critical care diseases. Whether SMPs improve outcomes after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is currently unknown. We aimed to study the effect of SMPs on 6-month mortality and neurologic outcomes following SAH. A systematic review of randomized control trials (RCTs) and observational studies was performed by searching multiple indexing databases from their inception through January 2019. Studies were limited to adult patients (age ≥ 18) with non-traumatic SAH reporting mortality, neurologic outcomes, delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) and other important complications. Data on patient and SMP characteristics, outcomes and methodologic quality were extracted into a pre-piloted collection form. Methodologic quality of observational studies was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale, and RCT quality was reported as per the Cochrane risk of bias tool. A total of 11,260 studies were identified, of which 37 (34 full-length articles and 3 abstracts) met the criteria for inclusion. Two studies were RCTs and 35 were observational. SMPs were divided into four broad domains: management of acute SAH, early brain injury, DCI and general neurocritical care. The most common SMP design was control of DCI, with 22 studies assessing this domain of care. Overall, studies were of low quality; most described single-center case series with small patient sizes. Definitions of key terms and outcome reporting practices varied significantly between studies. DCI and neurologic outcomes in particular were defined inconsistently, leading to significant challenges in their interpretation. Given the substantial heterogeneity in reporting practices between studies, a meta-analysis for 6-month mortality and neurologic outcomes could not be performed, and the effect of SMPs on these measures thus remains inconclusive. Our systematic review highlights the need for large, rigorous RCTs to determine whether providing standardized, best-practice management through the use of a protocol impacts outcomes in critically ill patients with SAH.

Trial registration Registration number: CRD42017069173.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Thailand)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nieuwkamp DJ, et al. Changes in case fatality of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage over time, according to age, sex, and region: a meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8(7):635–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Al-Khindi T, Macdonald RL, Schweizer TA. Cognitive and functional outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 2010;41(8):e519–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Macdonald RL, Schweizer TA. Spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage. Lancet. 2017;389(10069):655–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Johnston SC, Selvin S, Gress DR. The burden, trends, and demographics of mortality from subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurology. 1998;50(5):1413–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dorhout Mees SM, et al. Calcium antagonists for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000277.pub3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Ohman J, Heiskanen O. Timing of operation for ruptured supratentorial aneurysms: a prospective randomized study. J Neurosurg. 1989;70(1):55–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cowan JA Jr, et al. Outcomes after cerebral aneurysm clip occlusion in the United States: the need for evidence-based hospital referral. J Neurosurg. 2003;99(6):947–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Johnston SC. Effect of endovascular services and hospital volume on cerebral aneurysm treatment outcomes. Stroke. 2000;31(1):111–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Naval NS, et al. Controversies in the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(2):511–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Stevens RD, et al. Intensive care of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: an international survey. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35(9):1556–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Diringer MN, et al. Critical care management of patients following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: recommendations from the Neurocritical Care Society’s Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference. Neurocrit Care. 2011;15(2):211–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Connolly ES Jr, et al. Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/american Stroke Association. Stroke. 2012;43(6):1711–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Alberts MJ, et al. Recommendations for comprehensive stroke centers: a consensus statement from the Brain Attack Coalition. Stroke. 2005;36(7):1597–616.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chang SY, Sevransky J, Martin GS. Protocols in the management of critical illness. Crit Care. 2012;16(2):306.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Brook AD, et al. Effect of a nursing-implemented sedation protocol on the duration of mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med. 1999;27(12):2609–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Blackwood B, et al. Protocolized versus non-protocolized weaning for reducing the duration of mechanical ventilation in critically ill adult patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006904.pub2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Brower RG, et al. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(18):1301–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. English SW, et al. Protocol management of severe traumatic brain injury in intensive care units: a systematic review. Neurocrit Care. 2013;18(1):131–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. McCredie VA, et al. Impact of ICU structure and processes of care on outcomes after severe traumatic brain injury: a multicenter cohort study. Crit Care Med. 2018;46(7):1139–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pronovost PJ, Berenholtz SM, Needham DM. Translating evidence into practice: a model for large scale knowledge translation. BMJ. 2008;337:a1714.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Taran S, et al. The use of standardized management protocols for critically ill patients with non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage: a protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2018;7:53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Moher D, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):1006–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. de Oliveira Manoel AL, et al. The critical care management of poor-grade subarachnoid haemorrhage. Crit Care. 2016;20:21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Francoeur CL, Mayer SA. Management of delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Crit Care. 2016;20(1):277.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Macdonald RL. Delayed neurological deterioration after subarachnoid haemorrhage. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014;10(1):44–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Camporota L, Brett S. Care bundles: implementing evidence or common sense? Crit Care. 2011;15(3):159.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Vergouwen MD, et al. Definition of delayed cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage as an outcome event in clinical trials and observational studies: proposal of a multidisciplinary research group. Stroke. 2010;41(10):2391–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wells G, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. 2013. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp.

  29. Higgins JPT, Green S, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. http://handbook.cochrane.org.

  30. Thomas JE, McGinnis G. Safety of intraventricular sodium nitroprusside and thiosulfate for the treatment of cerebral vasospasm in the intensive care unit setting. Stroke. 2002;33(2):486–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Park J, et al. Formal protocol for emergency treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms to reduce in-hospital rebleeding and improve clinical outcomes. J Neurosurg. 2015;122(2):383–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Eide PK, et al. A randomized and blinded single-center trial comparing the effect of intracranial pressure and intracranial pressure wave amplitude-guided intensive care management on early clinical state and 12-month outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery. 2011;69(5):1105–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hanggi D, et al. A multimodal concept in patients after severe aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: results of a controlled single centre prospective randomized multimodal phase I/II trial on cerebral vasospasm. Zentralbl Neurochir. 2009;70(2):61–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hanggi D, et al. The effect of lumboventricular lavage and simultaneous low-frequency head-motion therapy after severe subarachnoid hemorrhage: results of a single center prospective Phase II trial. J Neurosurg. 2008;108(6):1192–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kim DH, Haney CL, Van Ginhoven G. Reduction of pulmonary edema after SAH with a pulmonary artery catheter-guided hemodynamic management protocol. Neurocrit Care. 2005;3(1):11–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Latorre JG, et al. Effective glycemic control with aggressive hyperglycemia management is associated with improved outcome in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 2009;40(5):1644–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Lerch C, et al. Specialized neurocritical care, severity grade, and outcome of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care. 2006;5(2):85–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Manoel AL, et al. St. Michael’s hospital protocol for the management of patients suffering from subarachnoid haemorrhage-a quality improvement initiative. Neurocrit Care. 2013;1:S259.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Mejia-Matilla JH, et al. Albumin in aneurysmal SAH: Effects of implementation of a protocol of continuous infusion on clinical outcomes. Neurocrit Care. 2015;1:S222.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Murphy A, et al. Changes in cerebral perfusion with induced hypertension in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a pilot and feasibility study. Neurocrit Care. 2017;27:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Thiele RH, et al. Strict glucose control does not affect mortality after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Anesthesiology. 2009;110(3):603–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Whitfield PC, et al. An audit of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: earlier resuscitation and surgery reduces inpatient stay and deaths from rebleeding. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1996;60(3):301–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Boonyawanakij T, Tirakotai W, Liengudom A. Lumbar drainage and low rate of permanent shunt insertion after treating aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Med Assoc Thai. 2016;99:S47–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Naidech AM, et al. Higher hemoglobin is associated with improved outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(10):2383–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Naidech AM, et al. Medical complications drive length of stay after brain hemorrhage: a cohort study. Neurocrit Care. 2009;10(1):11–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Suarez JI, et al. The Albumin in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (ALISAH) multicenter pilot clinical trial: safety and neurologic outcomes. Stroke. 2012;43(3):683–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Armonda RA, Thomas JE, Rosenwasser RH. Early and aggressive treatment of medically intractable cerebral vasospasm with pentobarbital coma, cerebral angioplasty and ICP reduction. Neurosurg Focus. 1998;5(4):e7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Awad IA, et al. Clinical vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage: response to hypervolemic hemodilution and arterial hypertension. Stroke. 1987;18(2):365–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Bailes JE, et al. Management morbidity and mortality of poor-grade aneurysm patients. J Neurosurg. 1990;72(4):559–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Barbarawi M, et al. Therapeutic approaches to cerebral vasospasm complicating ruptured aneurysm. Neurol Int. 2009;1(1):e13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Boet R, Mee E. Magnesium sulfate in the management of patients with Fisher Grade 3 subarachnoid hemorrhage: a pilot study. Neurosurgery. 2000;47(3):602–6 discussion 606–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Corsten L, et al. Contemporary management of subarachnoid hemorrhage and vasospasm: the UIC experience. Surg Neurol. 2001;56(3):140–8 discussion 148–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Fandino J, et al. Clinical, angiographic, and sonographic findings after structured treatment of cerebral vasospasm and their relation to final outcomes. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1999;141(7):677–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Kassell NF, et al. Treatment of ischemic deficits from vasospasm with intravascular volume expansion and induced arterial hypertension. Neurosurgery. 1982;11(3):337–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Kodama N, et al. Cisternal irrigation therapy with urokinase and ascorbic acid for prevention of vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage Outcome in 217 patients. Surg Neurol. 2000;53(2):110–7 discussion 117–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Lannes M, et al. Milrinone and homeostasis to treat cerebral vasospasm associated with subarachnoid hemorrhage: the Montreal Neurological Hospital protocol. Neurocrit Care. 2012;16(3):354–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Ljunggren B, et al. Outcome in 60 consecutive patients treated with early aneurysm operation and intravenous nimodipine. J Neurosurg. 1984;61(5):864–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Martinez M, et al. Prognostic factors for neurological outcome in patients with non traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37:S252.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Morgan MK, et al. Aggressive management of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage based on a papaverine angioplasty protocol. J Clin Neurosci. 2000;7(4):305–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Mutoh T, et al. Goal-directed fluid management by bedside transpulmonary hemodynamic monitoring after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 2007;38(12):3218–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Origitano TC, et al. Sustained increased cerebral blood flow with prophylactic hypertensive hypervolemic hemodilution (“triple-H” therapy) after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery. 1990;27(5):729–39 discussion 739–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Seiler RW, et al. Outcome of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in a hospital population: a prospective study including early operation, intravenous nimodipine, and transcranial Doppler ultrasound. Neurosurgery. 1988;23(5):598–604.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Seule MA, et al. Therapeutic hypothermia in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, refractory intracranial hypertension, or cerebral vasospasm. Neurosurgery. 2009;64(1):86–92 discussion 92–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Solomon RA, Fink ME, Lennihan L. Early aneurysm surgery and prophylactic hypervolemic hypertensive therapy for the treatment of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery. 1988;23(6):699–704.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Yonekawa Y, et al. Aneurysm surgery in the acute stage: results of structured treatment. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 1998;38(Suppl):45–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Vergouw LJM, et al. High early fluid input after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: combined report of association with delayed cerebral ischemia and feasibility of cardiac output-guided fluid restriction. J Intensive Care Med. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885066617732747.

  67. Frontera JA, et al. Defining vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage: what is the most clinically relevant definition? Stroke. 2009;40(6):1963–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. de Oliveira Manoel AL, et al. Common data elements for unruptured intracranial aneurysms and aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: recommendations from the working group on hospital course and acute therapies—proposal of a multidisciplinary research group. Neurocrit Care. 2019;30 Suppl 1:36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-019-00726-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Damani R, et al. Common Data Element for Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: recommendations from Assessments and Clinical Examination Workgroup/Subcommittee. Neurocrit Care. 2019;30(Suppl 1):28–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Suarez JI, et al. Common data elements for unruptured intracranial aneurysms and subarachnoid hemorrhage clinical research: a National Institute for Neurological Disorders and Stroke and National Library of Medicine Project. Neurocrit Care. 2019;30(Suppl 1):4–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Bijlenga P, et al. Common data elements for subarachnoid hemorrhage and unruptured intracranial aneurysms: recommendations from the working group on subject characteristics. Neurocrit Care. 2019;30(Suppl 1):20–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Stienen MN, et al. Prioritization and timing of outcomes and endpoints after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in clinical trials and observational studies: proposal of a Multidisciplinary Research Group. Neurocrit Care. 2019;30(Suppl 1):102–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Maas AI, et al. Re-orientation of clinical research in traumatic brain injury: report of an international workshop on comparative effectiveness research. J Neurotrauma. 2012;29(1):32–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thank you for considering this manuscript for publication in the Journal of Neurocritical Care. On behalf of my co-authors, I, Dr. Shaurya Taran, confirm that the following manuscript complies with all instructions to authors as outlined in the submission information package. I additionally confirm that the authorship requirements have been met and that all co-authors have reviewed and approved the final manuscript for submission.

Funding

Finally, this work was not supported by any external grants or funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ST participated in study planning, data screening, acquisition, and analysis, appraising the quality of studies, manuscript preparation and proofreading, and critical revisions. VT participated in data screening, acquisition, and analysis, and manuscript proofreading. JMS participated in study planning and manuscript proofreading. SWE participated in study planning and manuscript proofreading. VAM participated in study planning, develo** the search strategy, manuscript preparation and proofreading, and critical revisions.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaurya Taran.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 236 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Taran, S., Trivedi, V., Singh, J.M. et al. The Use of Standardized Management Protocols for Critically Ill Patients with Non-traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review. Neurocrit Care 32, 858–874 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-019-00867-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-019-00867-5

Keywords

Navigation