Log in

Shoreline dynamics in the reserved region of meghna estuary and its impact on lulc and socio-economic conditions: a case study from nijhum dwip, Bangladesh

  • Published:
Journal of Coastal Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The southern region of Bangladesh is more unstable than the other part of the country due to massive discharge of heavy sediment through the Meghna estuary. Discussions regarding shoreline representation are critical to regulate the dynamic nature of the coast. This study focuses on measuring the shoreline change, evaluating the LULC (land use & land cover) due to shoreline dynamics utilising multi-dated (1978–2018) satellite images, and changes in the social-economic condition by a direct interview-based questionnaire survey of Nijhum Dwip, Hatiya, Noakhali, Bangladesh. This study assessed shoreline transition through shoreline movement (NSM), endpoint rate (EPR), and prediction based on the EPR rate. 104% of the shore area was increased by -17 m to 86 m annually. Most of the accretion emerged on the Northern and Western sides; erosion only transpired on the Southern side. The shoreline was also projected to increase by 2.2 km, with 644.32 hectares in the study area by 2028. LULC mainly changed due to erosion-accretion activities in the study area. In accreted land, barren land, mudflats, homestead vegetation, and grassland were increased by 15.51 ha, 17.19 ha, 689.68 ha, and 578.17 ha, respectively, where the succession process formed the grassy beach. In contrast, cropland, green, and mangrove vegetation decreased by 12%, 9%, and 0.11%, drastically in its total area, although they had increased in accreted land. It was appraised that the vegetated area will raise 5103.39 hectares by 2028. Thus it was also determined that shoreline change positively impacted migration, economic activities, and tourism. As newly accreted land was cheap or could stay through "Bndobostho." People joined various working fields created in newly accreted land, as farmers increased by 7%. Moreover, about 83% of tourists increased due to shoreline expansion. Finally, this paper intends to contribute several suggestions to the socio-economic development of native people and future strategic management of the reserved coastal area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All the secondary data were collected from BWDB and USGS.

Notes

  1. The Landless get special land leases or incentives from government.

  2. A house with walls made of bamboo, mud, grass, reed, thatch, straw, leaves, and unburned bricks occasionally corrugated iron sheets as roofs.

  3. Closely houses made of jute sticks, tree leaves, jute sacks.

  4. A house constructed out of heavy materials like stone, brick, cement, concrete, or wood.

References

  • As-Salek JA, Yasuda T (2001) Tide–surge interaction in the Meghna estuary: Most severe conditions. J Phys Oceanogr 31(10):3059–3072

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper JAG, Jackson DWT, Navas F, McKenna J, Malvarez G (2004) Identifying storm impacts on an embayed, high-energy coastline: examples from western Ireland. Mar Geol 210(1–4):261–280

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Cui B-L, Li X-Y (2011) Coastline change of the Yellow River estuary and its response to the sediment and runoff (1976–2005). Geomorphology 127(1–2):32–40

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • de Wilde K (2011) Moving coastlines. University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolan R, Fenster MS, Holme SJ (1991) Temporal analysis of shoreline recession and accretion. J Coast Res 7(3):723–744

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenster MS, Dolan R, Elder JF (1993) A new method for predicting shoreline positions from historical data. J Coast Res 9(1):147–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenster MS, Dolan R, Morton RA (2001) Coastal storms and shoreline change: signal or noise? J Coast Res 17(3):714–720

    Google Scholar 

  • Finch JW (1997) Monitoring small dams in semi-arid regions using remote sensing and GIS. J Hydrol 195(1–4):335–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forkuo EK, Frimpong A (2012) Analysis of forest cover change detection. Int J Remote Sensing Appl 2(4):82–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Forest Resources Assessment (2005) www.fao.org/3/a0400e/a0400e00.htm. Accessed 05 May 2020

  • Hassan MI, & Rahmat NH (2016) The effect of coastline changes to local community’s social-economic. Int Arch Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing & Spatial Inf Sci XLII-4/W1:25–36

  • Jakobsen F, Azam MH, Mahboob-Ul-Kabir M (2002) Residual flow in the Meghna Estuary on the coastline of Bangladesh. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 55(4):587–597

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Li R, Liu J-K, Felus Y (2001) Spatial modeling and analysis for shoreline change detection and coastal erosion monitoring. Mar Geodesy 24(1):1–12

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Maiti S, Bhattacharya AK (2009) Shoreline change analysis and its application to prediction: A remote sensing and statistics based approach. Mar Geol 257(1–4):11–23

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • McFeeters SK (1996) The use of the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) in the delineation of open water features. Int J Remote Sens 17(7):1425–1432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mia AH, Islam MR (2005) Coastal land uses and indicative land zones. Program development office for integrated coastal zone management plan, Dhaka

    Google Scholar 

  • Milliman, JD (1991) Flux and fate of fluvial sediment and water in coastal seas. In: Mantoura RFC, Martin JM, Wollast R (eds) Ocean Margin Processes in Global Change. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, p 69–89

  • Mwanje JI (1997) Socio-Economic Impacts of Coastal Instability (Erosion) in Kenya: A Case Study

  • Orford JD, Forbes DL, Jennings SC (2002) Organisational controls, typologies and time scales of paraglacial gravel-dominated coastal systems. Geomorphology 48(1–3):51–85

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Pajak MJ, Leatherman S (2002) The high water line as shoreline indicator. J Coast Res 18(2):329–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettorelli N (2013) The normalized difference vegetation index. Oxford University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pidwirny, M. (2006). Plant succession. Fund Phys Geogr 2nd Edition.http://www.physicalgeography.net/fundamentals/9i.html. Accessed 30 May 2020

  • Rahman MM (2010) Offshore Nijhum Island: Overcoming climate change impact. The Daily Star, Dhaka

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman MS, Chowdhury F (2005) Program Development Office for Integrated Coastal Zone Management Plan (PDO-ICZMP) Investment and Financing Strategy for Coastal Zone Development in Bangladesh

  • Saha PK, Bodiuzzaman M, Uddin MN, Hossain MN, Shanta AS (2014) A Study on the management strategies of protected area in Bangladesh for biodiversity conservation on Nijhum Dwip, Noakhali, Bangladesh. Int J Innov Res Dev 3(7):140–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Sattar SA, Mutsaers HJW (2004) Agriculture in southeastern coastal chars of Bangladesh. Experiences and Guidelines (No. 12). Technical Report, 1. CDSP-II, Bangladesh

  • Thieler ER, Himmelstoss EA, Zichichi JL, Ergul A (2017) Digital shoreline analysis system (DSAS) Version 4.0—An ArcGIS extension for calculating shoreline change (Ver. 4.4, July 2017): US Geological Survey Open-file Report 2008–1278

  • Warren RS, Niering WA (1993) Vegetation change on a northeast tidal marsh: Interaction of sea-level rise and marsh accretion. Ecology 74(1):96–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MBS were involved in planning and supervising the work. PC performed the measurements, processed the experimental data, performed the analysis, drafted the manuscript and designed the figures. Also, PC aided in interpreting the results and worked on the manuscript, and MBS revised it critically. Finally, all the authors approved this final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Piash Chowdhury.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This study received ethical approval from the head and all the other faculty members from department of Geography and Environment, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet, Bangladesh.

Financial interests

The authors declare they have no financial interests.

Non-financial interests

Author Md. Bahuddin Sikder is Assistant Professor of Department of Geography and Environment, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet -3114, Bangladesh and receives no compensation as faculty member of Department of Geography and Environment, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet -3114, Bangladesh.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chowdhury, P., Sikder, M.B. Shoreline dynamics in the reserved region of meghna estuary and its impact on lulc and socio-economic conditions: a case study from nijhum dwip, Bangladesh. J Coast Conserv 28, 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-023-01000-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-023-01000-7

Keywords

Navigation