SpringerLink
Log in

Sensitivity of near real-time MODIS gross primary productivity in terrestrial forest based on eddy covariance measurements

  • Published:
Chinese Geographical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As an important product of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), MOD17A2 provides dramatic improvements in our ability to accurately and continuously monitor global terrestrial primary production, which is also significant in effort to advance scientific research and eco-environmental management. Over the past decades, forests have moderated climate change by sequestrating about one-quarter of the carbon emitted by human activities through fossil fuels burning and land use/land cover change. Thus, the carbon uptake by forests reduces the rate at which carbon accumulates in the atmosphere. However, the sensitivity of near real-time MODIS gross primary productivity (GPP) product is directly constrained by uncertainties in the modeling process, especially in complicated forest ecosystems. Although there have been plenty of studies to verify MODIS GPP with ground-based measurements using the eddy covariance (EC) technique, few have comprehensively validated the performance of MODIS estimates (Collection 5) across diverse forest types. Therefore, the present study examined the degree of correspondence between MODIS-derived GPP and EC-measured GPP at seasonal and interannual time scales for the main forest ecosystems, including evergreen broadleaf forest (EBF), evergreen needleleaf forest (ENF), deciduous broadleaf forest (DBF), and mixed forest (MF) relying on 16 flux towers with a total of 68 site-year datasets. Overall, site-specific evaluation of multi-year mean annual GPP estimates indicates that the current MOD17A2 product works highly effectively for MF and DBF, moderately effectively for ENF, and ineffectively for EBF. Except for tropical forest, MODIS estimates could capture the broad trends of GPP at 8-day time scale for all other sites surveyed. On the annual time scale, the best performance was observed in MF, followed by ENF, DBF, and EBF. Trend analyses also revealed the poor performance of MODIS GPP product in EBF and DBF. Thus, improvements in the sensitivity of MOD17A2 to forest productivity require continued efforts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Archibald S A, Kirton A, Van der Merwe M et al., 2009. Drivers of inter-annual variability in net ecosystem exchange in a semi-arid savanna ecosystem, South Africa. Biogeosciences, 6(2): 251–266. doi: 10.5194/bgd-5-3221-2008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aubinet M, Heinesch B, Longdoz B, 2002. Estimation of the carbon sequestration by a heterogeneous forest: night flux corrections, heterogeneity of the site and inter-annual variability. Global Change Biology, 8(11): 1053–1071. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2002.00529.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beer C, Reichstein M, Tomelleri E et al., 2010. Terrestrial gross carbon dioxide uptake: global distribution and covariation with climate. Science, 329(5993): 834–838. doi: 10.1126/science.1184984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berbigier P, Bonnefonda J M, Mellmann P, 2001. CO2 and water vapour fluxes for 2 years above Euroflux forest site. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 108(3): 183–197. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1923(01)00240-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betts A K, Zhao M, Dirmeyer P A et al., 2006. Comparison of ERA40 and NCEP/DOE near-surface data sets with other ISLSCP-II data sets. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984–2012), 111(D22). doi: 10.1029/2006JD007174

    Google Scholar 

  • Blonquist J, Montzka S A, Yakir D et al., 2010. The potential of carbonyl sulfide as a tracer for gross primary productivity at flux tower sites. American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting, B21G-07. doi:2010AGUFM.B21G.07B

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalhais N, Reichstein M, Ciais P et al., 2010. Identification of vegetation and soil carbon pools out of equilibrium in a process model via eddy covariance and biometric constraints. Global Change Biology, 16(10): 2813–2829. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chasmer L, Barr A, Hopkinson C et al., 2009. Scaling and assessment of GPP from MODIS using a combination of airborne lidar and eddy covariance measurements over jack pine forests. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113(1): 82–93. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2008.08.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen W B, Maiersperger T K, Yang Z et al., 2003. Comparisons of land cover and LAI estimates derived from ETM+ and MODIS for four sites in North America: a quality assessment of 2000/2001 provisional MODIS products. Remote Sensing of Environment, 88(3): 233–255. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2003.06.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coops N C, Black T A, Jassal R P S et al., 2007. Comparison of MODIS, eddy covariance determined and physiologically modelled gross primary production (GPP) in a Douglas-fir forest stand. Remote Sensing of Environment, 107(3): 385–401. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2006.09.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desai A R, 2010. Climatic and phenological controls on coherent regional interannual variability of carbon dioxide flux in a heterogeneous landscape. Journal of Geophysical Research, 115: G00J02. doi: 10.1029/2010JG001423

  • Don A, Rebmann C, Kolle O et al., 2009. Impact of afforestation-associated management changes on the carbon balance of grassland. Global Change Biology, 15(8): 1990–2002. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01873.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dragoni D, Schmid H P, Wayson C A et al., 2011. Evidence of increased net ecosystem productivity associated with a longer vegetated season in a deciduous forest in south-central Indiana, USA. Global Change Biology, 17(2): 886–897. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02281.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garbulsky M F, Peñuelas J, Papale D et al., 2008. Remote estimation of carbon dioxide uptake of terrestrial ecosystems. Global Change Biology, 14(12): 2860–2867. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01684.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granier A, Pilegaard K, Jensen N O, 2002. Similar net ecosystem exchange of beech stands located in France and Denmark. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 114(1): 75–82. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1923(02)00137-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant R F, Hutyra L R, de Oliveira R C et al., 2009. Modeling the carbon balance of Amazonian rain forests: resolving ecological controls on net ecosystem productivity. Ecological Monographs, 79(3): 445–463. doi: 10.1890/08-0074.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grünwald T, Bernhofer C, 2007. A decade of carbon, water and energy flux measurements of an old spruce forest at the Anchor Station Tharandt. Tellus B, 59(3): 387–396. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0889.2007.00259.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinsch F A, Zhao M, Running S W et al., 2006. Evaluation of remote sensing based terrestrial productivity from MODIS using regional tower eddy flux network observations. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 44(7): 1908–1925. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2005.853936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houghton R A, Hackler J L, Lawrence K T, 1999. The US carbon budget: contributions from land-use change. Science, 285 (5427): 574–578. doi: 10.1126/science.285.5427.574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanamitsu M, Ebisuzaki W, Woollen J et al., 2002. Ncep-Doe Amip-Ii Reanalysis (r-2). Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 83(11): 1631–1643. doi: 10.1175/BAMS-83-11-1631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanniah K D, Beringer J, Hutley L B et al., 2009. Evaluation of collections 4 and 5 of the MODIS Gross Primary Productivity product and algorithm improvement at a tropical savanna site in northern Australia. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113(9): 1808–1822. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2009.04.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knohl A, Schulze E D, Kolle O et al., 2003. Large carbon uptake by an unmanaged 250-year-old deciduous forest in Central Germany. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 118(3): 151–167. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1923(03)00115-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagergren F, Eklundh L, Grelle A et al., 2005. Net primary production and light use efficiency in a mixed coniferous forest in Sweden. Plant, Cell & Environment, 28(3): 412–423. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2004.01280.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang S, Wang K, Zhang X et al., 2010. Review on estimation of land surface radiation and energy budgets from ground measurement, remote sensing and model simulations. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 3(3): 225–240. doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2010.2048556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd J, Taylor J, 1994. On the temperature dependence of soil respiration. Functional Ecology, 8(3): 315–323. doi: 10.2307/2389824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morales P, Sykes M T, Prentice I C et al., 2005. Comparing and evaluating process-based ecosystem model predictions of carbon and water fluxes in major European forest biomes. Global Change Biology, 11(12): 2211–2233. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.01036.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myneni R B, Ramakrishna R, Nemani R et al., 1997. Estimation of global leaf area index and absorbed PAR using radiative transfer models. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 35(6): 1380–1393. doi: 10.1109/36.649788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nightingale J M, Coops N C, Waring R H et al., 2007. Comparison of MODIS gross primary production estimates for forests across the USA with those generated by a simple process model, 3-PGS. Remote Sensing of Environment, 109(4): 500–509. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2007.02.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan S, Tian H, Dangal S R et al., 2014. Modeling and monitoring terrestrial primary production in a changing global environment: toward a multiscale synthesis of observation and simulation. Advances in Meteorology, ID965936. doi: 10.1155/2014/965936

    Google Scholar 

  • Papale D, Valentini R, 2003. A new assessment of European forests carbon exchanges by eddy fluxes and artificial neural network spatialization. Global Change Biology, 9(4): 525–535. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00609.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Propastin P, Ibrom A, Knohl A et al., 2012. Effects of canopy photosynthesis saturation on the estimation of gross primary productivity from MODIS data in a tropical forest. Remote Sensing of Environment, 121(6): 252–260. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2012.02.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman A F, Sims D A, Cordova V D et al., 2005. Potential of MODIS EVI and surface temperature for directly estimating per-pixel ecosystem C fluxes. Geophysical Research Letters, 32(19): L19404. doi: 10.1029/2005GL024127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichstein M, Falge E, Baldocchi D et al., 2005. On the separation of net ecosystem exchange into assimilation and ecosystem respiration: review and improved algorithm. Global Change Biology, 11(9): 1424–1439. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.001002.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson A D, Anderson R S, Arain M A et al., 2012. Terrestrial biosphere models need better representation of vegetation phenology: results from the North American Carbon Program Site Synthesis. Global Change Biology, 18(2): 566–584. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02562.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Running S W, Nemani R R, Heinsch F A et al., 2004. A continuous satellite-derived measure of global terrestrial primary production. Bioscience, 54(6): 547–560. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saigusa N, Yamamoto S, Hirata R et al., 2008. Temporal and spatial variations in the seasonal patterns of CO2 flux in boreal, temperate, and tropical forests in East Asia. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 148(5): 700–713. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2007.12.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seiler T J, Rasse D P, Li J H et al., 2009. Disturbance, rainfall and contrasting species responses mediated aboveground biomass response to 11 years of CO2 enrichment in a Florida scrub-oak ecosystem. Global Change Biology, 15(2): 356–367. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01740.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjöström M, Zhao M, Archibald S et al., 2013. Evaluation of MODIS gross primary productivity for Africa using eddy covariance data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 131(4): 275–286. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2012.12.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan B, Woodcock C E, Hu J et al., 2006. The impact of gridding artifacts on the local spatial properties of MODIS data: implications for validation, compositing, and band-to-band registration across resolutions. Remote Sensing of Environment, 105(2): 98–114. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2006.06.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang X G, Wang Z M, Liu D W et al., 2012. Estimating the net ecosystem exchange for the major forests in the northern United States by integrating MODIS and AmeriFlux data. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 156(4): 75–84. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner D P, Urbanski S, Bremer D et al., 2003. A cross-biome comparison of daily light use efficiency for gross primary production. Global Change Biology, 9(3): 383–395. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00573.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verma M, Friedl M A, Richardson A D et al., 2014. Remote sensing of annual terrestrial gross primary productivity from MODIS: an assessment using the FLUXNET La Thuile data set. Biogeosciences, 11(8): 2185–2200. doi: 10.5194/bgd-10-11627-2013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Ma M, Li X et al., 2013. Validation of MODIS-GPP product at 10 flux sites in northern China. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 34(2): 587–599. doi: 10.1080/01431161.2012.715774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Woodcock C E, Buermann W et al., 2004. Evaluation of the MODIS LAI algorithm at a coniferous forest site in Finland. Remote Sensing of Environment, 91(1): 114–127. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2004.02.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams C A, Hanan N P, Baker I et al., 2008. Interannual variability of photosynthesis across Africa and its attribution. Biogeosciences, 113: G04015. doi: 10.1029/2008JG000718

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu C Y, Munger J W, Niu Z et al., 2010. Comparison of multiple models for estimating gross primary production using MODIS and eddy covariance data in Harvard Forest. Remote Sensing of Environment, 114(12): 2925–2939. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2010.07.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu C, Chen J M, Huang N, 2011. Predicting gross primary production from the enhanced vegetation index and photosynthetically active radiation: evaluation and calibration. Remote Sensing of Environment, 115(12): 3424–3435. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2011.08.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • **ao J, Zhuang Q, Law B E et al., 2010. A continuous measure of gross primary production for the conterminous U.S. derived from MODIS and AmeriFlux data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 114(3): 576–591. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2009.10.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang F H, Ichii K, White M A et al., 2007. Develo** a continental-scale measure of gross primary production by combining MODIS and AmeriFlux data through support vector machine approach. Remote Sensing of Environment, 110(1): 109–122. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2007.02.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao M, Running S W, 2010. Drought-induced reduction in global terrestrial net primary production from 2000 through 2009. Science, 329(5994): 940–943. doi: 10.1126/science.1192666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao M, Running S W, Nemani R R, 2006. Sensitivity of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) terrestrial primary production to the accuracy of meteorological reanalyses. Biogeosciences, 111(G1). doi: 10.1029/2004JG000004

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Watershed Geographic Sciences, Nan**g Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nan**g, 210008, China

    Xuguang Tang, Hengpeng Li, **nyan Li & Li Yao

  2. Key Laboratory of Poyang Lake Wetland and Watershed Research (Jiangxi Normal University), Ministry of Education, Nanchang, 330022, China

    Xuguang Tang & Guihua Liu

  3. Department of Geography, University of Zurich, Zurich, CH-8006, Switzerland

    **g **e

  4. Jilin University, College of GeoExploration Science and Technology, Changchun, 130000, China

    Shouzhi Chang

Authors
  1. Xuguang Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hengpeng Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Guihua Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. **nyan Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Li Yao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. **g **e
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Shouzhi Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hengpeng Li.

Additional information

Foundation item: Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41401221, 41271500, 41201496), Opening Fund of Key Laboratory of Poyang Lake Wetland and Watershed Research (Jiangxi Normal University), Ministry of Education, China (No. PK2014002)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tang, X., Li, H., Liu, G. et al. Sensitivity of near real-time MODIS gross primary productivity in terrestrial forest based on eddy covariance measurements. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 25, 537–548 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-015-0777-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-015-0777-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation