Résumé
L’exérèse rectale avec exérèse du mésorectum est le traitement de référence du cancer du rectum. Si l’exérèse locale constitue une alternative séduisante avec des résultats opératoires excellents sans risque de séquelles fonctionnelles digestives, elle fait l’impasse pourtant sur un éventuel envahissement ganglionnaire. Ainsi, il faut impérativement rechercher sur la pièce opératoire les critères histopronostiques défavorables (c’est-à-dire corrélés à un risque élevé de métastase ganglionnaire): infiltration profonde de la sous muqueuse (T1sm3), marges de résection envahies, emboles vasculaires et/ou lymphatiques. Une proctectomie complémentaire doit être proposée en cas de présence d’au moins un ou plusieurs critères défavorables. La microchirurgie endoscopique (TEM) permet l’exérèse locale de tumeurs du moyen et haut rectum, inaccessibles par voie transanale conventionnelle avec une meilleure qualité d’exérèse chirurgicale.
Abstract
Rectal resection with mesorectum excision is the standard operation for rectal tumors. Local surgery is an alternative with excellent operative results and no risk of functional troubles but with no lymph nodes staging. Then, unfavorable pathologic criteria must be assessed on local rectal specimen: depth of submucosal invasion (T1sm3), positive resection margins, vascular and/or lymphatic invasion. Further radical surgery is required in case of unfavorable criteria. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) allows locally complete excision of rectal tumors with high surgical excision quality (R0 resection), especially for mid and upper lesions, which are inaccessible by conventional local surgery.
Références
Enker WE, Thaler HT, Cranor ML, Polyak T (1995) Total mesorectal excision in the operative treatment of carcinoma of the rectum. J Am Coll Surg 181:335–346
Rullier E, Laurent C, Bretagnol F, et al (2005) Sphincter-saving resection for all rectal carcinomas: the end of the 2-cm distal rule. Ann Surg 241:465–469
Fazio VW, Zutshi M, Remzi FH, et al (2007) A randomized multicenter trial to compare long-term functional outcome, quality of life, and complications of surgical procedures for low rectal cancers. Ann Surg 246:481–488; discussion 488–90
Christoforidis D, Cho HM, Dixon MR, et al (2009) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus conventional transanal excision for patients with early rectal cancer. Ann Surg 249:776–782
Peeters KC, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, et al (2007) The TME trial after a median follow-up of 6 years: increased local control but no survival benefit in irradiated patients with resectable rectal carcinoma. Ann Surg 246:693–701
Bretagnol F. (2007) Recommendations for clinical practice. Therapeutic choices for rectal cancer. What role should local treatment play in rectal cancer? Gastroenterol Clin Biol 31 S63–S74, S97–100
Bipat S, Glas AS, Slors FJM, et al (2004) Rectal cancer: local staging and assessment of lymph node involvement with endoluminal US, CT, and MR imaging—a meta-analysis. Radiology 232:773–783
Buess G, Kipfmuller K, Hack D, et al (1988) Technique of transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Surg Endosc 2:71–75
Allaix ME, Arezzo A, Caldart M, et al (2009) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal neoplasms: experience of 300 consecutive cases. Dis Colon Rectum 52:1831–1836
Sgourakis G, Lanitis S, Gockel I, et al (2011) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for T1 and T2 rectal cancers: a meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis of outcomes. Am Surg 77:761–772
Moore JS, Cataldo PA, Osler T, Hyman NH (2008) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is more effective than traditional transanal excision for resection of rectal masses. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1026–1030
Seman M, Bretagnol F, Guedj N, et al (2010) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) for rectal tumor. The first French singlecenter experience. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 34:488–493
Kikuchi R, Takano M, Takagi K, et al (1995) Management of early invasive colorectal cancer. Risk of recurrence and clinical guidelines. Dis Colon Rectum 38:1286–1295
Bretagnol F, Rullier E, George B, et al (2007) Local therapy for rectal cancer: still controversial? Dis Colon Rectum 50:523–33
Peng J, Chen W, Sheng W, et al (2011) Oncological outcome of T1 rectal cancer undergoing standard resection and local excision. Colorectal Dis 13:e14–19
Doornebosch PG, Ferenschild FT, de Wilt JH, et al (2010) Treatment of recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) for T1 rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1234–1239
Hahnloser D, Wolff BG, Larson DW, et al (2005) Immediate radical resection after local excision of rectal cancer: an oncologic compromise? Dis Colon Rectum 48:429–437
Piessen G, Cabral C, Benoist S, et al (2011) Previous transanal full-thickness excision increases the morbidity of radical resection for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 16 (in press)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Bretagnol, F. Quelles sont les bonnes indications d’exérèse locale des petits cancers du rectum ?. Colon Rectum 6, 114–117 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11725-012-0378-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11725-012-0378-x