Log in

CRISPR: Beyond the Excitement

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. Ethics of a physiotherapist; Touch; Corporeality; Intimacy; Grounded theory

References

  • Bassett, A.R. and J.L. Liu. 2014. CRISPR/Cas9 and genome editing in Drosophila. Journal of Genetics and Genomics 41(1): 7–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chow, R.D., and S. Chen. 2018. Cancer CRISPR screens in vivo. Trends in Cancer 4(5): 349–358.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz, N.M., and B. S. Freedman. 2018. CRISPR gene editing in the kidney. American Journal of Kidney Disease 71(6): 874–883.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de Miguel Beriain, I., and B. Sanz. 2020. Human dignity and gene editing: Additional support for Raposo’s arguments. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 17(2): 165–168.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, M., and Z. Master. 2018. Ethical issues of using CRISPR technologies for research on military enhancement. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 15(3): 327–335.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, T.K., and H. Puchta. 2021. Novel CRISPR/Cas applications in plants: From prime editing to chromosome engineering. Transgenic Research 30(4): 529–549.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jabbar, A., F. Zulfiqar, M. Mahnoor, et al. 2021. Advances and perspectives in the application of CRISPR-Cas9 in livestock. Molecular Biotechnology 63(9): 757–767.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leonova, E.I., and R.R. Gainetdinov. 2020. CRISPR/Cas9 technology in translational biomedicine. Cell Physiology and Biochemistry 54(3): 354–370.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, M., B. Gilbert, and M. Ayliffe. 2016. Applications of CRISPR/Cas9 technology for targeted mutagenesis, gene replacement and stacking of genes in higher plants. Plant Cell Reports 35(7): 1439–1450.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Menchaca, A., P.C. Dos Santos-Neto, A.P. Mulet and M. Crispo. 2020. CRISPR in livestock: from editing to printing. Theriogenology 150: 247–254.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ranisch, R. 2021. When CRISPR meets fantasy: Transhumanism and the military in the age of gene editing. In Transhumanism: The Proper Guide to a Posthuman Condition or a Dangerous Idea?, edited by W. Hofkirchner and H.-J. Kreowski, 111–120. Switzerland: Springer Nature.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Raposo, V. L. 2019. Gene editing, the mystic threat to human dignity. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 16(2): 249–257.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schindele, A., A. Dorn, and H. Puchta. 2020. CRISPR/Cas brings plant biology and breeding into the fast lane. Current Opinions in Biotechnology 61: 7–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shrock, E., and M. Güell. 2017. CRISPR in animals and animal models. Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science 152: 95–114.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strich, J.R., and D.S. Chertow. 2019. CRISPR-Cas biology and its application to infectious diseases. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 57(4). https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01307-18

  • Taning, C.N.T., B. Van Eynde, N. Yu, S. Ma, and G. Smagghe. 2017. CRISPR/Cas9 in insects: Applications, best practices and biosafety concerns. Journal of Insect Physiology 98: 245–257.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khaled Moustafa.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The author(s) declare no competing interests.

Ethical Approval

No human or animal subjects are used.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moustafa, K. CRISPR: Beyond the Excitement. Bioethical Inquiry 21, 7–9 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-023-10295-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-023-10295-y

Keywords

Navigation