Abstract
Currently, waste disposal has been highlighted strategically all over the world. Solid recovered fuel (SRF) with a high calorific value is manufactured from municipal solid waste (MSW). Thermogravimetric Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (TG-FTIR) and distributed activation energy model (DAEM) were utilized to study the pyrolysis of the individual components and their mixture (i.e. SRF), which were obtained from a MSW incineration power plant. The best operating conditions were defined by comparing the effect of heating rates and flow rates of sweep gas. The gaseous products and functional groups in the pyrolysis of each component and their mixture were researched. Additionally, a direct search method was presented to obtain the DAEM kinetic parameters. DAEM equations for volatile products were given to describe pyrolysis of SRF. The model prediction results are consistent with the experimental results. The kinetic data will provide a basis for gas composition regulation from theoretical modeling.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- T i :
-
initial temperature in volatilization process/°C
- T f :
-
final temperature in volatilization process/°C
- T px :
-
temperatures at the peaks x in DTG curves/°C
- ΔT 1/2 :
-
temperature range of (dω/dτ)/(dω/dτ)max=1/2/°C
- (dω/dτ)max :
-
maximal devolatilization rate in absolute value form
- A:
-
ash
- ad:
-
air dry basis
- CFD:
-
Computational Fluid Dynamics
- DAEM:
-
distributed activation energy model
- Fc:
-
fixed carbon
- FTIR:
-
Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy
- M:
-
moisture
- MBT:
-
mechanical-biological treatment
- MSW:
-
municipal solid waste
- SRF:
-
solid recovered fuel
- TG:
-
Thermogravimetric
- V:
-
volatile matter
References
National Bureau of Statistics of China, China Statistical Yearbook 2019. China Statistics Press, 2019.
Wagland S.T., Kilgallon P., Coveney R., et al., Comparison of coal/solid recovered fuel (SRF) with coal/refuse derived fuel (RDF) in a fluidized bed reactor. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 2011, 31(6): 1176–1183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.01.001.
Dunnu G., Maier J., Gerhardt A., Thermal utilization of solid recovered fuels in pulverized coal power plants and industrial furnaces as part of an integrated waste management concept. Appropriate Technologies for Environmental Protection in the Develo** World: Selected Papers from ERTEP 2007, July 17–19 2007, Ghana, Africa; Yanful, E. K., Ed.; Springer Netherlands, 2009, pp. 83–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9139-1_10.
Edo-Alcón N., Gallardo A., Colomer-Mendoza F.J., Characterization of SRF from MBT plants: Influence of the input waste and of the processing technologies. Fuel Processing Technology, 2016, 153: 19–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2016.07.028.
Chen L., Wang X., Yang H., et al., Study on pyrolysis behaviors of non-woody lignins with TG-FTIR and Py-GC/MS. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2015, 113: 499–507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2015.03.018.
Chen L., Yu Z., Liang J., et al., Co-pyrolysis of chlorella vulgaris and kitchen waste with different additives using TG-FTIR and Py-GC/MS. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018, 177: 582–591. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.10.010.
Fang S., Yu Z., Ma X., et al., Analysis of catalytic pyrolysis of municipal solid waste and paper sludge using TG-FTIR, Py-GC/MS and DAEM (distributed activation energy model). Energy, 2018, 143: 517–532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.11.038.
Fang S., Yu Z., Ma X., et al., Co-pyrolysis characters between combustible solid waste and paper mill sludge by TG-FTIR and Py-GC/MS. Energy Conversion and Management, 2017, 144: 114–122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.04.046.
Kai X., Li R., Yang T., et al., Study on the co-pyrolysis of rice straw and high density polyethylene blends using TG-FTIR-MS. Energy Conversion and Management, 2017, 146: 20–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.05.026.
Lin Y., Liao Y., Yu Z., et al., A study on co-pyrolysis of bagasse and sewage sludge using TG-FTIR and Py-GC/MS. Energy Conversion and Management, 2017, 151: 190–198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.08.062.
Peng X., Ma X., Lin Y., et al., Co-pyrolysis between microalgae and textile dyeing sludge by TG-FTIR: Kinetics and products. Energy Conversion and Management, 2015, 100: 391–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.05.025.
Fang C., Jiang X., Lv G., et al., Chemical synthesis residual pyrolysis and combustion: kinetics and evolved gases investigated by TG-FTIR. Journal of Thermal Science, 2020, 29(1): 108–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11630-019-1140-6.
Wu J., Chen T., Luo X., et al., TG/FTIR analysis on co-pyrolysis behavior of PE, PVC and PS. Waste Management, 2014, 34(3): 676–682. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2013.12.005.
Zhou H., Long Y., Meng A., et al., Interactions of three municipal solid waste components during co-pyrolysis. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2015, 111: 265–271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2014.08.017.
Nzioka A.M., Kim M.-G., Hwang H.-U., et al., Kinetic study of the thermal Decomposition Process of Municipal Solid Waste Using TGA. Waste Biomass Valor, 2019, 10(6): 1679–1691. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-017-0183-8.
Góneş M., Güneş S., A direct search method for determination of DAEM kinetic parameters from nonisothermal TGA data (note). Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2002, 130(2): 619–628. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0096-3003(01)00124-2.
Anthony D.B., Howard J.B., Coal devolatilization and hydrogastification. AIChE Journal, 1976, 22(4): 625–656. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690220403.
Yan J.H., Zhu H.M., Jiang X.G., et al., Analysis of volatile species kinetics during typical medical waste materials pyrolysis using a distributed activation energy model. Journal of hazardous materials 2009, 162(2–3): 646–651. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.05.077.
Taro S., Nakorn W., Kinetic analyses of biomass pyrolysis using the distributed activation energy model. Fuel, 2008, 87(3): 414–421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2007.05.004.
Qiao Y., Xu F., Xu S., et al., Pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics of typical municipal solid waste components and their mixture: Analytical TG-FTIR study. Energy Fuels, 2018, 32(10): 10801–10812. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b02571.
Wu L., Jiang X., Lv G., et al., Interactive effect of the sorted components of solid recovered fuel manufactured from municipal solid waste by thermogravimetric and kinetic analysis. Waste management (New York, N.Y.), 2019, 102: 270–280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.10.054.
Miura K., A new and simple method to estimate f(E) and k0(E) in the distributed activation energy model from three sets of experimental data. Energy Fuels, 1995, 9(2): 4–7.
Tia S., Bhattacharya S.C., Wibulswas P., Thermogravimetric analysis of Thai lignite—I. pyrolysis kinetics. Energy Conversion and Management, 1991, 31(3): 265–276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0196-8904(91)90080-3.
**ang Y.H., Wang Y., Zhang J.M., et al., Study on combustion kinetics of partial gasified coal char by using distributed activation energy model. Journal of Combustion Science & Technology, 2003, 9(6): 566–570.
Wójtowicz M.A., Bassilakis R., Smith W.W., et al., Modeling the evolution of volatile species during tobacco pyrolysis. Journal of Analytical & Applied Pyrolysis, 2003, 66(1–2): 235–261.
Cai J., Ji L., Pattern search method for determination of DAEM kinetic parameters from nonisothermal TGA data of biomass. Journal of Mathematical Chemistry, 2007, 42(3): 547–553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10910-006-9130-9.
Sang S., Duan Y., Chen H., et al., TG-FTIR analysis on pyrolysis characteristics of waste plastics. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 36(2): 159–163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-6504.2013.02.033.
Zhu H., Study on pyrolysis and incineration of medical waste including the numerical simulation of three-stage rotary kiln incinerator. Zhejiang University, China, 2009.
Sørum L., Grønli M.G., Hustad J.E., Pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics of municipal solid wastes. Fuel, 2001, 80(9): 1217–1227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(00)00218-0.
Bai J.S., Yu C.J., Wu P., et al., TG-FTIR analysis on pyrolysis characteristics of refuse-derived fuel. CIESC Journal, 2013, 64(3): 1042–1048.
Tian B., Qiao Y., Bai L., et al., Pyrolysis behavior and kinetics of the trapped small molecular phase in a lignite. Energy Conversion and Management, 2017, 140: 109–120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.02.077.
Ma Y., Wang J., Zhang Y., TG-FTIR study on pyrolysis of waste printing paper. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2017, 129(2): 1225–1232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-017-6218-3.
Xu F., Wang B., Yang D., et al., TG-FTIR and Py-GC/MS study on pyrolysis mechanism and products distribution of waste bicycle tire. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018, 175: 288–297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.09.013
Acknowledgments
This research is supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFC1901302, 2018YFF0215001, 2017YFC0703100), the Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51621005), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51676172), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2018FZA4010, 2016FZA4010).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, L., Jiang, X., Lv, G. et al. Analysis of the Pyrolysis of Solid Recovered Fuel and Its Sorted Components by using TG-FTIR and DAEM. J. Therm. Sci. 32, 1671–1683 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11630-023-1714-1
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11630-023-1714-1