Log in

Comparison of Clinical Effects Between Warm Water Spray and Sitz Bath in Post-hemorrhoidectomy Period

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Background

Warm water sitz bath is advised for a variety of anorectal disorders. However, preparation of the sitz bath is sometimes difficult for patients. As an alternative to the sitz bath, we have adapted a water spray method. A randomized, controlled study was conducted to determine if the water spray method has similar effects to the sitz bath in the post-hemorrhoidectomy period and it is easy to carry out.

Methods

A total of 120 patients were randomly assigned to water spray or sitz bath groups. All patients received analgesics and a fiber-rich diet after hemorrhoidectomy. Clinical parameters including pain, irritation (burning or itching sensations), hygiene, convenience, and overall satisfaction were evaluated by a visual analog scale to assess treatment outcome in both groups.

Results

There was no obvious difference in age, gender distribution, body mass index, or duration of disease between groups. There were no significant difference in scores for postoperative pain (p = 0.23), irritation (p = 0.48), or hygiene (p = 0.725) between groups. However, the water spray group reported significantly greater convenience (p < 0.05) and higher overall satisfaction (p < 0.05) compared with the sitz bath group. At the end of the 4-week postoperative follow-up period, 90% of patients in the watery spray group and 93% of patients in the sitz bath group showed complete wound healing. There were no significant differences in postoperative complications between groups.

Conclusion

Our results demonstrate that the water spray method could provide a safe and reliable alternative to the sitz bath for post-hemorrhoidectomy care. Furthermore, the water spray method could be used instead of the sitz bath as a more convenient and satisfactory form of treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bleday R, Pena JP, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM, Buls JG. Symptomatic hemorrhoids: Current incidence and complications of operative therapy. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:477–481. doi:10.1007/BF02049406.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Shafik A. ‘Somatoanal’ reflex or ‘thermosphincteric’ reflex? Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:726–728. doi:10.1007/BF02235602.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ferguson JA, Mazier WP, Ganchrow MI, Friend WG. The closed technique of hemorrhoidectomy. Surgery 1971;70:480–484.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Whitehead W. The surgical treatment of hemorrhoids. BMJ 1882;1:148–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Milligan ET, Morgan CN, Jones LE. Surgical anatomy of the anal canal and the operative treatment of hemorrhoids. Lancet 1937;2:1119–1124. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)88465-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ho YH, Seow-Choen F, Tan M, Leong AF. Randomized controlled trial of open and closed haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 1997;84:1729–1730. doi:10.1002/bjs.1800841223.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gencosmanoglu R, Sad O, Koc D, Inceoglu R. Hemorrhoidectomy: Open or closed technique? A prospective, randomized clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:70–75. doi:10.1007/s10350-004-6116-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hetzer FH, Demartines N, Handschin AE, Clavien PA. Stapled vs excision hemorrhoidectomy: long-term results of a prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg 2002;137:337–340. doi:10.1001/archsurg.137.3.337.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Janicke DM, Pundt MR. Anorectal disorders. Emerg Med Clin North Am 1996;14:757–788. doi:10.1016/S0733-8627(05)70278-9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ramler D, Roberts J. A comparison of cold and warm sitz baths for relief of postpartum perineal pain. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 1986;15:471–474. doi:10.1111/j.1552-6909.1986.tb01426.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Friend WD. Hot sitz baths. Med J Aust 1995;162:448.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. McConnell EA. Giving your patient a sitz bath. Nursing 1993;23:14.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang LT, Wu CC, Hsiao CW, Feng CC, Jao SW. A modified Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy for circumferential prolapsed hemorrhoids with skin tags. Dis Colon Rectum 2008;51:456–461. doi:10.1007/s10350-007-9179-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Johanson JF, Sonnenberg A. The prevalence of hemorrhoids and chronic constipation. An epidemiologic study. Gastroenterology 1990;98:380–386.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Thomson WH. The nature of haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 1975;62:542–552. doi:10.1002/bjs.1800620710.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tejirian T, Abbas MA. Sitz bath: where is the evidence? Scientific basis of a common practice. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:2336–2340. doi:10.1007/s10350-005-0085-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shafik A. Role of warm-water bath in anorectal conditions. The “thermosphincteric reflex.”. J Clin Gastroenterol 1993;16:304–308. doi:10.1097/00004836-199306000-00007.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shafik A. Role of warm water bath in inducing micturition in postoperative urinary retention after anorectal operations. Urol Int 1993;50:213–217.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gupta PJ. Effects of warm water sitz bath on symptoms in post-anal sphincterotomy in chronic anal fissure—A randomized and controlled study. World J Surg 2007;31:1480–1484.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Okeke LI. Fournier’s gangrene in Ibadan. Afr J Med Med Sci 2000;29:323–324.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lara-Torre E, Hertweck SP, Kives SL, Perlman S. Premenarchal recurrent periclitoral abscess: A case report. J Reprod Med 2004;9:983–985.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Goto S, Mori M, Fukaya Y, Nakamura K. Nursing measures against adverse reaction from anti-cancer chemotherapy. Nippon Rinsho 2003;61:943–948.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hatagawa K, Tatsuzono K, Matsumura S, Sato Y. Instructions on daily activities of hemorrhoid patients with special reference to sitz bath. Kango Gijutsu 1975;21:60–68.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Dodi G, Bogoni F, Infantino A, Pianon P. Hot or cold in anal pain? A study of the changes of internal anal sphincter pressure profiles. Dis Colon Rectum 1986;29:248–251.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kahraman A, Karaca K, Etoz A, Ozcan M. Perianal burn as a complication of hemorrhoid treatment caused by hot water sitz bath. Burns 2004;30:868–870.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cheng-Wen Hsiao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hsu, KF., Chia, JS., Jao, SW. et al. Comparison of Clinical Effects Between Warm Water Spray and Sitz Bath in Post-hemorrhoidectomy Period. J Gastrointest Surg 13, 1274–1278 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-009-0876-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-009-0876-9

Keywords

Navigation