Log in

Large, moderate, small earthquakes and seismic fortification criterion

  • Published:
Acta Seismologica Sinica

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

This paper discusses the relation between two-step seismic design and the standard of probability of exceedance, and the relation of three-levels seismic ground motion parameters given by probability method and comprehensive probability method. The relative size relations of the ground motions with 2%, 10%, 63% probability of exceedance in 50 years, namely “large earthquake”, “moderate earthquake”, and “small earthquake”, are discussed through a practical example of seismic hazard analysis. The methods to determine seismic fortification criterion are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • China Academy of Building Research. 1990. Clause Explanation of Code for Seismic Design of Buildings [M]. Bei**g: Liaoning Science and Technology Press, 1–2 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • China Seismological Bureau. 1998. Earthquake Resistance and Disaster Reduction Law of the People’s Republic of China [M]. Bei**g: Seismological Press, 6–7 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell C A. 1968. Engineering seismic risk analysis [J]. Bull Seism Soc Amer, 58(5): 1 583–1 606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellingwood B R. 1994. Probability-based codified design for earthquakes [J]. Engineering Structures, 16(7): 498–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GAO Meng-tan, HAN Wei. 1992. Determination of large, moderate and small earthquakes in seismic design [A]. Seismic Engineering Research Corpus [C]. Bei**g: Seismological Press, 22–27 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenn R. 1998. Background Commentary Development of Maximum Considered Ground Motion Maps NEHPR Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings [D]. Massachusetts: Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc, 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • HU Yu-xian. 1988. Seismic Engineering [M]. Bei**g: Seismological Press, 629–645 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • HU Yu-xian. 1990. Comprehensive Probability Method of Seismic Hazard Analysis [M]. Bei**g: Seismological Press, 1–9 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Construction, PRC, General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China. 2001. Code for Seismic Design of Buildings (GBJ50011-2001) [M]. Bei**g: China Construction Industrial Press, 195–197 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • ZHANG **ao-mei, GAO Meng-tan. 2000. Research of design seismic motion zonation based on aim of collapse resistance [D][Master dissertation]. Bei**g: Institute of Geophysics, China Seismological Bureau, 46–47 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Foundation item: Shanghai Science and Technology Development Foundation (022512065) and Shanghai Construction Technology Development Foundation (A0206101).

About this article

Cite this article

Shen, Jw., Shi, Sz. Large, moderate, small earthquakes and seismic fortification criterion. Acta Seimol. Sin. 17, 589–595 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11589-004-0042-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11589-004-0042-0

Key words

CLC number

Navigation